<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The Chalkboard</title>
      <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/</link>
      <description>News that impacts the K-12 education scene.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:26:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>The black male dilemma: What to do?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Concerned citizens in Guilford County are <a href="http://beta.news-record.com/content/2008/07/02/article/reports_prompt_push_for_change">mobilizing</a> to help the Board of Education address the <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/leadership/aa_achievement.htm">challenges</a> facing black males in the district as well as overcome the hurdles imposed by standardized testing. 

This comes with the <a href="http://beta.news-record.com/content/2008/07/02/article/school_suspensions_drop_3_percent_in_last_year">release</a> of preliminary suspension numbers by Guilford County Schools. The file is too large to upload, so if you are interested in the full report, e-mail me at morgan.josey@news-record.com.

Next week: The long-awaited magnet schools study makes its way to <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/boe/2008/7_8/memorandum.html">Tuesday's school board meeting</a>. Check out the first half of the report <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/boe/2008/7_8/magnet_memo.html">here</a>. 

 ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/07/the_black_male.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/07/the_black_male.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">reports</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:26:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>School board to meet next week to review superintedent applications</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Guilford County Board of Education will meet twice next week to narrow down the list of candidates for the superintendent position, Deena Hayes told me today. I'm assuming those meetings will take place on July 9 and 10 as I received <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/news/news_detail.aspx?n_id=483">special meeting notices</a> for those dates today. 

Hayes said the board still hopes to have someone in place by the start of school. Just in case you missed the announcement last week, <a href="http://rayassoc.com/">Ray and Associates</a> received 135 applications from 33 states, including North Carolina. Thirty-one people passed through the screening procedures and eight made the semi-finalist list (although the board plans to review all 31 applications). 

The semi-finalists are from Alabama, Georgia, Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia. 

I'll update as I get more information.  ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/07/school_board_to.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/07/school_board_to.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Central office</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:01:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Group examines southern states&apos; educational progress</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Check out the progress <a href="http://www.sreb.org/Goals/2008State/NorthCarolina2008.pdf">North Carolina</a> and other <a href="http://www.sreb.org/Goals/State_Goals_Report_2008.asp">states</a> have made, according to a round up by the <a href="http://www.sreb.org/">Southern Regional Education Board</a>. ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/07/group_examines.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/07/group_examines.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:37:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>17,000 students enroll in state virtual high school</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Read more about the one-year-old initiative <a href="http://www.ncvps.org/news/announcements/2007-08/20080625-01">here</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/17000_students.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/17000_students.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">state</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:48:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>State budget doesn&apos;t look good for districts</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<strong>Note: </strong>The public can <a href="http://www.ncpublicschools.org/sbe_meetings/08sbemedia.html">listen</a> to the state Board of Education discuss the 2008-09 budget in a 3 p.m. special meeting today. 

The N.C. Department of Public Instruction notified district finance officers across the state Monday that they could face a shortfall in funds provided for diesel fuel. Below, the text of that message: ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/state_budget_do.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/state_budget_do.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2008-09 budget</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:56:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Is NCLB helping high-achieving students?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Not so, according to the <a href="http://www.edexcellence.net/template/index.cfm">Fordham Institute</a>, which released this <a href="http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/gifted_students_EMBARGO.pdf">report</a> today. 

Statement from Joyce VanTassel-Baska, past president of the <a href="http://www.nagc.org">National Association for Gifted Children</a> and member of the study’s peer-review panel: 

<blockquote>"As our nation makes significant gains boosting the performances of low-achieving students, we continue to shortchange our gifted students.  Settling for stagnation or modest learning gains penalizes gifted learners, especially underserved students whose needs continue to go unmet, and jeopardizes our nation's future as we struggle to compete in the global economy.  

"Especially alarming are findings that our nation’s teachers do not consider themselves prepared to meet the unique learning needs of gifted students, nor do they feel encouraged by the system to focus on cultivating the talents of our gifted learners.  While no one will dispute the critical need of increasing proficiency for students at the lowest levels, doing so at the expense of high-performing students – especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds – only perpetuates the cycle of inequality and results in continued underperformance in the classroom. 

"I hope this study serves as a wake-up call if we as a nation are truly committed to leaving no child behind and investing in students from all ability levels to maximize their potential.  Nothing less than our future is at stake."</blockquote>

One thing pointed out in the study is that low-achievers have made greater gains than high-achievers over the years. My question is: Is it fair to compare the gains among these two sets of students? While it is possible for a student to score a low 2 on a state exam one year and then a few years later score a high 3, how far can a student who scores a low four go (when the scale is 1-4)?]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/is_nclb_helping.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/is_nclb_helping.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">reports</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Robbing Johnny to pay Susie</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Howard Lee, chairman of the state Board of Education, and state Superintendent June Atkinson, are not happy about the proposed budget coming out of the Senate. Their statement, released Monday:  

<blockquote>"Today, the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Education released its budget for the public schools. Overall, the news for PreK-12 schools is not good.  

First, we want to commend the Senate on fully funding the State Board of Education's request to expand the More at Four Prekindergarten Program. This will ensure that at least 5,000 additional at-risk 4-year-olds are prepared to enter and succeed in the public schools.

At the same time, the Senate's budget overall will place the burden of funding quality education on our local school districts. As diesel fuel prices push past $4 per gallon, the Senate increased the fuel budget by a net of $8 million or $0.32 per gallon. This leaves a major hole in the PreK-12 budget. If the Senate Budget passes as it is currently written, it is likely that we will need to withhold from $40-$60 million from local school districts' budgets in order to cover fuel and student population growth needs. In addition, the Senate budget for ABCs bonuses for teachers is $36 million short of our projections for the 2007-08 school year. This level of funding likely would mean reductions to the bonuses awarded to our public school teachers.  

In addition, the Senate failed to make key investments requested by the Board to increase needed services for teachers and principals in schools with low student achievement and high dropout rates as part of the state's assistance program and the Court's focus on low-performing high schools.

We look forward to addressing these concerns as the budget process continues."</blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/robbing_johnny.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/robbing_johnny.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2008-09 budget</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:54:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Lessons learned</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Guilford County Board of Education will, after 15 years, stop insuring school property through the N.C. Department of Public Instruction. 

The <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/03/eastern_guilfor_2.shtml#comments">reason</a>? It was able to get a stronger policy through Surry Insurance Co. (underwritten by Berkley Mid-Atlantic). The policy will cost more than <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/boe/2008/6_10/insurance_memo.html">$781,000</a>, but sublimits have been increased, which in the event of a loss, would keep the district's out-of-pocket expenses low. Examples: Berkley Mid-Atlantic would pay $750,00 for extra expenses, such as moving students, whereas the old policy offered $100,000. The state also offered a total of $1 million for both demolition and cost of construction expenses. The new policy: $3 million. 

Risk Manager Wanda Frazier said she was told the district could have received $20 million more in its settlement for Eastern Guilford High School had it been covered under this new policy. GCS received a settlement of $17.6 million from the state. An expensive lesson to learn.

Keep in mind however, that even with a $37.6 million settlement, GCS is building the new Eastern at a cost of $61 million. 

By the way, the school board spent a great deal of time Tuesday <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/boe/2008/6_10/haberman_memo.html">discussing</a> (and questioning) the <a href="http://www.habermanfoundation.org/">Haberman</a> process of interviewing teachers and administrators. Turns out former Superintendent Terry Grier is using the same process in San Diego -- and ruffling some feathers -- as he <a href="http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2008/06/12/news/shakeup061208.txt">overhauls</a> the positions there.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/lessons_learned.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/lessons_learned.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Central office</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:18:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>GCS recognized for teacher recruitment strategies</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/news/news_detail.aspx?n_id=468">district</a> is one of six in the country to be <a href="http://www.nea.org/newsreleases/2008/nr080611.html">recognized</a> by the <a href="http://www.nea.org">National Education Alliance</a>. ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/gcs_recognized.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/gcs_recognized.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Central office</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:19:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Board to talk school bond</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<strong>Update:</strong> Find <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/construction/update/index.htm">here</a> a GCS update on the 2008 bond.

The Guilford County Board of Education has a pretty busy agenda for <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/boe/2008/6_10/memorandum.html">Tuesday's meeting</a>. On the list is an update from the architectural selection committee that met last week to discuss what construction methods to use for the 2008 bond. Tomorrow, the board could decide whether to follow the committee's recommendation on using "construction management at risk" for fewer than half the 27 projects. 

I attended the committee meeting last week and wrote about it, but it was not published (it's kind of inside baseball, if you know what I mean). Below, what I wrote: ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/board_to_talk_s.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/board_to_talk_s.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2008 Bond</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:54:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>State releases teacher working conditions survey</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<strong>Update: </strong>More Guilford County Schools teachers reported being pleased with their working conditions this year than in 2006, the last time a statewide survey was issued by Gov. Mike Easley’s office. However, the district again posted lower scores than the state average. 

A few things stand out about the results, released May 15 (but apparently not announced to the media): 
* Eighty percent of Guilford educators responded to the survey, a 10 percentage point increase from 2006. 
* More teachers responded favorably to questions about Guilford County Schools in the areas of time, facilities and resources, leadership and professional development. For example, 54 percent of teachers agreed that they have reasonable class sizes, compared to 43 percent in 2006. 
* Despite concerns vocalized over the past year about student misbehavior and violence, 85 percent of respondents reported that they work in a safe school environment. That compares to 72 percent in 2006.

You can view the results <a href="http://ncteachingconditions.org/reports/">here</a>. ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/state_releases_1.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/state_releases_1.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">reports</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">state</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:01:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Advanced Learning conducts reviews</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Find <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/ALprogramreviews.pdf">here</a>  the pilot program reviews conducted by Guilford County Schools Advanced Learning Department as part of the <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080601/NRSTAFF/480294414">story</a> that ran today. 

<strong>Update:</strong> What you read on Sunday was just a snippet of what is happening with the district's gifted and talented population. I started reporting on the AL department in February, but found with the school bond, superintendent search, budget, and another project I am working on that it would be best to approach this story in chunks, rather than all together. 

I plan to follow up on the districtwide program review as well as do more with the Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate programs. Actually, a sidebar that I wrote about Smith and its IB program did not run on Sunday, although the graphic ran. Basically, that sidebar stated that Smith teachers don't really see the IB scores as a failure when you compare them with Grimsley and High Point Central. Those two schools have had the IB program since the mid-1990s, so it is understandable that they would outperform Smith. 

Find the text of that sidebar below: ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/advanced_learni.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/06/advanced_learni.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Special programs</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 06:09:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Report: Many states backloaded NCLB goals</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/May2008%20nclb%20report.pdf">report</a> released this week by the <a href="http://www.cep-dc.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=document_ext.showDocumentByID&nodeID=1&DocumentID=238">Center on Education Policy</a> shows that many states have chosen to postpone raising the bar on NCLB profiency standards, resulting in dramatically higher—and potentially unreachable—achievement goals beginning with the 2008-09 schools year. Other states, including<a href="http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/nclb/abcayp/overview/targetgoalschart.pdf"> North Carolina</a>, set incremental goals in an attempt to make steady progress toward the 100 percent profiency targets. 

Read the full report <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/may%202008%20nclb%20report%202.pdf">here</a>. 

Taking incremental steps is not without its own challenges. North Carolina students have <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061013/NEWSREC0101/610130303/-1/NEWSREC0201">struggled</a> in the past to meet the stricter standards the state has set. The Department of Public Instruction is still waiting to hear back from federal officials on a request to not count the reading scores for grades three through eight for Adequate Yearly Progress sanction purposes. You can read the state's rationale in the attached <a href="http://www.ncpublicschools.org/sbe_meetings/0805/gcs/0805gcs02.pdf">letter</a> (page 3 of the letter).

I talked to Gongshu Zhang, GCS's chief accountability officer, about this a month ago, and he said that he expected fewer schools will make AYP if the federal government doesn't allow the exemption. Zhang, who used to work for DPI, said that the department did not properly prepare educators for the increase in standards (which occur every three years) and so teachers have been discouraged when students perform poorly on the exams. Zhang said he thinks the state should have piloted the increased standards before implementing them state-wide. 

Zhang said the percentage point increases in targets, for example, increasing from 76.7 percent in reading to 84.4 percent, appears arbitrary. He suggested increasing by a smaller percentage. 

"You must give us solid rationale as to why this amount is scientifically based," he said. 

That of course begs the question, how do you meet the federal goal of 100 percent by 2014?]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/05/report_many_sta.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/05/report_many_sta.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">reports</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">testing</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:35:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>GCS scores C minus on online transparency with John Locke Foundation</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<strong>Update:</strong> Story <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080521/NRSTAFF/875820866">here</a>.

Also, a response from Sharon Ozment, chief finance officer with GCS: 

"Let me begin by saying that Guilford County Schools (GCS) is continually looking for ways to improve communication and information sharing. We will contact the John Locke Foundation and ask which districts are getting a grade of A and review their respective Web sites to determine what GCS might do differently with respect to online transparency. 

"I will hasten to add that the 'Superintendents' Recommended 2008-09 Budget' is currently on our Web site. We will also add our financial audit for the year ended June 30, 2007 as well. With that said, it is important to note that we often have discussions about how best to communicate and share information and much like students with different learning styles, our citizens have different preferences as to how to receive information. It would be interesting to find out how many school districts in NC conduct a line-item review of their budget that is televised live and broadcast at least two other times after the fact. There are also some external measures by which we assess the quality of our financial documents and operations."

------------------------------------------------
The Johne Locke Foundation issued a <a href="http://www.johnlocke.org/site-docs/research/reportcard/spotlight.pdf">report</a> today that <a href="http://www.johnlocke.org/site-docs/research/reportcard/">graded</a> local governments on how transparent their budget and spending information is on their Web sites. Guilford County Schools scored a C minus. Scores ranged from C to F. 

Go the the GCS <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/">Web site</a> and you can easily find the <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/leadership/09budget.htm">superintendent's budget recommendations</a> and brief <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/pdfs/GCS_annual%20report.pdf">annual report</a>. Not so with the line item budget or the annual financial audit. Want to find out how much in federal dollars each <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/depts/title1/0708schools.htm">Title 1 school</a> gets? Good luck. 

To GCS's credit, school officials do link many documents on the Board of Education's agenda, but it takes a saavy user to track those documents down, especially months or years after the fact. 

Budget information can get tedious and complicated but that is no excuse not to provide more information online, particularly the final editions of the local, state and federal budgets. The district also should post quarterly cashflow bond forecasts, such as this <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/2003%20bond%20cashflowforecast2.xls">one</a> for the 2003 bond. 

What would you want to see online?

By the way, the new district relations officer, Lekan Oguntoyinbo, started today. He replaces Sonya Conway, who left in March to work for American Express. Any questions for him?
<img alt="LekanO.jpg" src="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/LekanO.jpg" width="100" height="112" /> 



]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/05/gcs_scores_c_on.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/05/gcs_scores_c_on.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">reports</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:51:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Giving you the play by play on the school bonds</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This is my first time covering a school bond as it happens (I arrived at the N&R in 2006), so I will try to keep the updates coming on how the projects proceed. I checked in with Chief Operations Officer Leo Bobadilla about a week ago to get a timeline. What he gave me was not enough for a story, but fortunately for you, it's enough for a Chalkboard post! 

Expect the next updates/stories around May 28 and June 3 when the <a href="http://www.gcsnc.com/boe/2007/3_13/construct_advise_memo.html">construction advisory</a> and architectural selection committees meet. 

Following, my Q and A with Bobadilla:]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/05/giving_you_the.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/chalkboard/archives/2008/05/giving_you_the.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">2008 Bond</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:35:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
