If smoke bothers you, eat somewhere else
A recent letter to the News & Record made reference to a vote by the North Carolina legislators for a smoke-free assembly. Also, a bill was introduced to ban smoking in all restaurants. The action by the legislators was proper, as they are required to work in the Assembly Hall. However, they would be off-base to pass a bill that does not allow a legal product in a place of business.
People are not required to frequent a restaurant. We choose to eat there. The restaurant owner must have complete authority to decide whether to allow smoking in the restaurant. If we don't want to be subjected to possible secondhand smoke, then the choice is ours not to eat there.
The writer cited several establishments that have banned smoking, and that is their right.
Contrary to the writer's opinion, not only are the smokers' rights infringed upon, but so are the rights of the restaurant owner.
If smoking is banned, what could be next: Cooking with animal fat? Fatty foods? High-calorie foods? Salt? Alcohol?
We, the public, must make responsible choices and not allow the government do it for us.
Herbert Smith
Greensboro