If you have doubts, leave Fluffy at home
Thanks for alerting travelers to the risks of flying with their animal companions ("Airlines must report number of pet deaths, injuries," June 4). Even with laws forcing airlines to keep track of animal deaths, a plane's cargo hold is no place for an animal -- it's terrifyingly stressful and often deadly. An airline's record of animal deaths will be little consolation to anyone who disembarks to find that their pet has been killed.
Take Fluffy into the cabin with you. If she fits under the seat (check for size limits), make sure the carrier is sturdy, securely locked and large enough to allow her to stand, stretch and turn around.
If Fluffy is too large, the kindest option is leaving her at home where she's comfortable instead of taking her to a kennel. Find a trustworthy animal-sitter and don't feel strange about checking up or even leaving extra bowls of water in case the sitter gets struck by lightning or loses your key. Fluffy will thank you.
Ingrid E. Newkirk
Norfolk, Va.
The writer is president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).
Comments (7)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
Or better yet, leave those small screaming ass kids at home and bring the pets with you.
Posted on June 11, 2005 8:19 AM
I'm going to be a bit flippant about this one so bear with me.
I never have liked people bringing their animals in the passenger areas of any type of vehicle. Least of all a cat.
Yes, I've had cats before. I have had the displeasure of taking these cats to the vet in my automobile. Some were fine with it, others not so fine. I made the mistake of taking "Snowball" to the vet without a cage and in a car. It's a wonder I didn't end up in a ditch or in the side of someone else's car. That cat went ballistic. It was clamouring over me, the car sets, the windows, and at one point I swear it was on the roof. So I got one of those carrier/cage things. That was a little better, but not by much. "Snowball" would wail and shake the carrier. She even turned it over during one trip. Of course, the cat probably knew it was going to the vet and that may be the cause of the commotion. I would give that one hundred percent of the cause if I had not heard similar stories from other cat owners when they would go on trips with their precicous "Fluffy." I can just see the rest of the passengers on a three hour flight with "Fluffy" wailing away in the overhead compartment. Something tells me the cat would be better off with the luggage than with the passengers.
Now as for those little dogs I see women stuffing in their purses in the supermarket. I know we're talking about planes and travel, but this must be said. My feeling, and I think it's the law, is you shouldn't bring any animal other than a service animal into a food store or a restaurant. Especially if said animal is prone to lick itself in places where it's urine or feces exits. Stop bringing them in and exposing the rest of us to your pets "stuff."
Now as for taking it on a plane, the same thing applies to it as a cat. I know some animals are better behaved than others, but what about the one who likes to yap or snap at someone other than the owner? "Fifi" just won't make it in the overhead. The whining of a dog small enough to fit up there is going to drive people up the wall and force some to consider a D.B. Cooper out the back of the plane.
It is better to leave "Fluffy" and "Fifi" back home with a sitter if you're going on a business trip or vacation. There are several area services available for pets. Many are licensed and bonded. Take advantage of them. Just remember there are other people on the plane who had the consideration to leave their pet behind so that pet wouldn't complicate an already stressfull situation.
Posted on June 11, 2005 9:10 AM
I have cats and dogs. I would never consider putting them in my car to go anywhere other than the vet much less carrying them onto a plane. And I don't care if "fluffy" is your "baby". Fluffy needs to stay home with a babysitter.
Posted on June 11, 2005 12:34 PM
I'm gonna pop a stitch over steve's comment. I forgot about those. My sister-in-law related a story once about taking a cross country redeye flight with someone else's child on the plane who had night terrors. Talk about inconsiderate. The parents thought process must have shut down. "I know we'll take Junior on a night flight so he can scream and flail about while others are trying to sleep instead of taking him during the day when he'd be awake and not having those awful dreams."
Posted on June 11, 2005 5:07 PM
Two years ago, I flew overnight 8 hours to Zurich. There was a toddler that screamed it's head off the entire time. It was worse than dying and going to hell. There should be a sound-proof booth on board that parents can take the little demons into, or at least put some cyanide caplets next to the barf bags to help passengers cope. 200+ had to stay awake all night because some over-practical mother forgot to plop a valium in the formula bottle. There has to be a better option than having to endure such misery.
Posted on June 11, 2005 8:18 PM
We've had discussions in the past about animals and I would like to say again.....IT'S A DOG!!!! GEEZ!!!! Why in the heck do people want to fly with a friggin' dog anyways?
P.S. This writer is a member of P.E.T.A. (People for the Eating of Tasty Animals)
Posted on June 13, 2005 9:12 AM
suffer the little children
Posted on June 13, 2005 2:42 PM