News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Letters to the Editor

« Troops in Iraq are doing job they were sent to do | Main | Triad embarrassment »

Marines serve for country, not for selves

The following is a Counterpoint.

By Patrick Tillman

In answer to the column by Sarah Jones, "Is military asking too much" (June 14), I have some thoughts. Her observation that people join the various branches of our military for different reasons is correct. It is true that those who serve enjoy the pleasure of many tangible benefits such as free health care, Montgomery G.I. Bill, travel and so on.

I am writing from a unique position of clarity after having served in the Al Anbar province of Iraq as a sergeant in the U.S. Marine Reserves. I submit that those of us who voluntarily serve our nation do so for the vast intangibles associated with serving in the armed forces. Honor, courage, commitment, selflessness and discipline are priceless values inculcated in the making of a Marine, soldier, sailor or airman.

Perhaps the greatest feeling is knowing the men and women to one's right and left have put their lives in your hands and that you have put your life in their hands. This is not measured by money or reward.
American Marines, sailors, soldiers, airmen and Coast Guardsmen have more demands on them today than most civilians can understand. We are in an historical struggle with a dark, radical force that seeks to destroy our way of life. The men and women of the armed forces whom I know and have served with understand this grave threat and seek to prevent the world from drifting aimlessly into darker times.

Undoubtedly, events like Abu Ghraib and the alleged events by Marines in Haditha have severely strained those efforts. Despite some isolated despicable acts, we often overlook the heroic acts of compassion and humanitarianism on display around the world.

From the tsunami in Thailand, to the earthquake in Pakistan and here at home in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, our armed forces answer the call and continue to be a force for good that spans the globe.

College tuition, training and free medical care are wonderful, but there is a more profound reason young men and women risk their lives every day as professional Marines. U.S. Marines are expected by the American people to win battles. That is to defeat enemies, foreign and domestic, and defend our constitution. Mediocre pay, long hours, thankless efforts and, yes, multiple deployments are inherent in the American serviceman's life. We're not time-clock punchers looking for avenues that afford us the least amount of work for the most reward.
Serving in the armed forces is one of the greatest honors an American can have. I hope this helps to answer Jones' uncertainties about the U.S. military.

The writer lives in Greensboro.

Comments (22)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

James D. Rockefeller [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

"We are in an historical struggle with a dark, radical force that seeks to destroy our way of life."

Just another letter Bashing Bush, yarn....

James D. Rockefeller [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

(Jut Kidding!!)

DemonDeacon [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Support our troops. Bring them home from Iraq.

JDR,
Love your post above!

DemonDeacon [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

The Marines are now being used as pawns on Bush's chessboard. They did the heavy lifting, they took on the Iraqi military and they won. Bring them home as winners--now. After all, Bush has already declared, "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED"!!

DemonDeacon [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

I thought Pat Tillman was killed by friendly fire????

WAJ [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Great letter!!

Semper Fi!!

nemo0037 [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

"The Marines are now being used as pawns on Bush's chessboard."

Chess? You MUST be joking. At best, he's playing tic tac toe.

jcackbar [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Thanks for your selfless service to our country in a time of war, Mr. Tillman.You can see from the above comments that not all appreciate your sacrifice, or they abuse the freedoms won with the blood of our veterans.
Please forgive their ignorance, the majority of our citizens appreciate your service more than you can know.
The side benefits of serving will never outweigh the dangers of service.
Our veterans serve to help insure and continue our way of life, and preserve freedom and democracy.

JEC [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

DD- different Patrick Tillman. I believe this Pat Tillman has a family member (father) serving as a rep at the state level...might be wrong.

Having a family member in the armed forces (USAF) who is currently flying into Iraq, I appreciate your pov, Patrick. Your comments about putting one's life into the hands of the men and women on either side of you remind me of the book, We Were Soldiers Once...And Young, which chronicled the events at Ia Drang. Hal Morris wrote of soldiers fighting for one another. One may not always agree with the decisions made by the Commander in Chief, but there is little choice when it's down to brass tacks. The commitment shown by those who serve our country is to be commended and there is a lesson in it for us all. Personal opinions about this war aside, those in our military serve selflessly, leaving their families for months on end, putting their lives on the line, and enduring many hardships to help protect people they don't know.

It's a great privilege to have the freedom to rail at the govt over decisions they make...we can all thank a soldier for sacrificing to protect that freedom.

DemonDeacon [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Nemo,
You are right! While I give Bush credit for being smarter than he appears, I've begun to think that is just wishful thinking on my part!
He probably gets together with "Mumsie" and plays a round of 'Candyland' or 'Old Maids'.

DemonDeacon [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

JEC,
Good points. I would say ALL who post here have a healthy appreciation for the soldiers--if not, they would not be so concerned about bringing them home safely.

What I do have a problem with is an administration that has no exit strategy and puts trained soldiers in civilian situations where they have no expertise. When a solider dies in Iraq, his/her blood is on the hands of Rumsfeld, Bush, and Cheney.

James D. Rockefeller [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

jcackbar:

Your statement: " ... not all appreciate your sacrifice, or they abuse the freedoms won with the blood of our veterans" ... could not be further from my own personal truth.

nemo0037 [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

"You can see from the above comments that not all appreciate your sacrifice, or they abuse the freedoms won with the blood of our veterans."

Here's one thing that bothers me a lot when talking with certain folks. They think that if they fight in a war, or otherwise sacrifice themselves for the good of the country, they have a right to dictate what is said. I strongly disagree. If I have to get your approval to say something, I do not have freedom of speech.

If I am to have the freedom you fought for, then there is no way to "abuse" it. So I would advise you and any other veteran who doesn't like what I have to say or think to just stow that "abuse" BS. It doesn't wash. If you like freedom so much, then you ought to be able to live with everything it entails, such as people saying things you don't like.

DemonDeacon [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Nemo! Right on brother!

jcackbar [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Nemo and DD:
I like welfare programs, but some abuse them.
I like the free cheese program, but some people abuse it.
I like the idea of public housing, but some people abuse it.
And, yes, you can abuse your right to speak out when you use it to attack others and do harm to our military who are serving you.
If you don't understand that, then you're not smart enough to understand the responsibility that comes with exercising your rights.

Carol Dunn [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

It seems that some think that being in the military is totally honorable and must be praised and never questioned. Since we have a voluntary military at this time, those who serve chose to serve. Some have honorable motives, some don't. Some serve honorably, some don't.

nemo0037 [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Carol, I think that anyone who volunteers to serve in our military deserves an assumption of honor, at least until they show evidence of dishonorable service. But I think that attitude is far removed from my judgement of the reasons for the current war and the political climate we live in these days. I honor our soldiers, but I pity them for having to obey people of questionable motives and intelligence.

jcackbar, I agree with you that with freedom of speech, comes a civic responsibility to use it for good purposes. Perhaps that is why we have a separate term for what we live in: I wonder if "Liberty" is an expression that covers the tension between complete freedom and civic duty. Personally, I would prefer to see less talk of "freedom" -- which must be tempered in some ways for a society to work properly -- and a little more about "Liberty" and what that exactly should mean.

joejoe [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

I support the service of the letter writer. I have addressed many of my sentiments in the (next) following letter to the editor which is also supportive of military efforts.

Patrick, is there a way for me to contact you? I know that this is a public forum and you may not want to give out any personal contact information.

Thank you,
JoeJoe

Bubba [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

"They think that if they fight in a war, or otherwise sacrifice themselves for the good of the country, they have a right to dictate what is said. I strongly disagree."

No, we just have a right to expose the nonsense of the Usual Suspects who have no clue about what they're talking about.

James D. Rockefeller [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

DoubleD:

While it's clear there are "trained soldiers in civilian situations where they have no expertise", I disagree the administration "has no exit strategy". They FINALLY do (no sarcasm).

You might check this out, which concludes with what the Admin's been saying: "security conditions improve and as the Iraqi Security Forces become more capable of securing their own country, Coalition forces will move out of the cities, reduce the number of bases from which they operate, and conduct fewer visible missions."

http://www.defenselink.mil/home/features/Iraq_Reports/docs/2006-02-Report.pdf

What it adds is levels of detail not given in sound bites.
What it needs is monitoring, e.g., keeping track of the secure-province count, etc.
What it lacked was earlier development, communication and understanding - Before the Invasion of Iraq.

I do believe we have turned the corner, and are headed towards a relatively stable Iraq - with some caveats:

I'm not sure anyone knows what that will look like, but it clearly will not be as originally envisioned by Perleman and Wolfy and Chalabi.

I'm not sure we will actually "disengage" because of all the other BS going on in the area - whether these will be legit' & critical reasons or just excuses to stay, we'll have to see. With the refusal to wean America off oil - someday we may be happy we've created an invincible base to assure we can steal (or only reimburse as we feel appropriate).

Think of the apocalyptic world of Mad Max: "When the gangs take over the highway... ...Remember he's on your side."

There's a HUGE military build-up going on world wide. e.g., USA, China, and sabre rattling too, e.g., North Korea, Israel, Iran.

There's a matching HUGE movement towards Religion - world wide. (China and North Korea have the Religion of State.) Considering the absolute knowledge and unimpeachable status demanded by most religions, all with God exclusively on their side, we may be in for a doozie.

With the incredible dumbing down of America: kids failing our schools, our historic populist sentiment "where the final check and balance on the power of the politicians is directly in the hands of the people" being handed to a very small group of very arrogant men in the vague name of "The War On Terror", the infamous Military Industrial Complex (Industrial Complex now including the financial interest of the Peoples Republic of China as well as the Walton family), ...

Everyone asleep now? Daddy's gonna turn out the light; don't let the bed bugs bite.

James D. Rockefeller [TypeKey Profile Page] said:
DemonDeacon [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

James,
I feel that the "monitoring" part is a must. These are the same characters that led us into the "slam dunk" and had no meaningful response to the chaos caused. Note, I said "caused". As refrigerators and A/C units were being looted, Rummy said it was all a part of "being free". LOL.
Also, Herbert Hoover continued to say, "Prosperity is just around the corner" as the Great Depression was coming on. Thing about it is, Herbert Hoover had credibility and the current President has none. I'm not from Missouri, but I still say, "Show Me".
Good points and good book.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.