Bicyclists do pay for their right to the road
In Mike Markham's letter (Sept. 12), he makes the case that bicyclists should not have the right to use the road since they do not help to pay for them. He seems to think that the highway construction and maintenance of this state and the country are financed by the license tag fees and property taxes on cars. Even if this money went exclusively to that, it would not cover all the costs of the roads in Summerfield, much less the rest of the state.
Markham, and I'm sure many other drivers, need to understand that our federal and state taxes cover the bulk of the costs. Mr. Markham, those cyclists may very well be paying more than you are for the roads.
So next time you are following them, maybe you should slow down and show some regard and maybe even thank them for helping to pay for "your" roads.
Scott Duncan
Greensboro
Comments (13)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
"maybe you should slow down"... you most likely will have no choice but to slow down, and probably have to swerve across a double yellow line in a curve to keep from running over them.
Posted on September 20, 2006 6:40 AM
Of you could just go straight.
Posted on September 20, 2006 10:00 AM
This letter came at such a great time. Just yesterday afternoon I was sitting in a line of what I estimated to be about 50 cars on 220 (where it is two lanes heading out of town). Traffic was moving very slowly because it was hard for the cars to pass a cyclist. An ambulance and a fire truck approached me from behind. It seemed like it took them an eternity to get past all of us, even though all of the cars, even myself pulled off of the road one by one to let them pass. I wonder to myself about the person in need of those emergency services who were held up because if the traffic.
I am not against bicycles on the road. In most cases I don't let it bother me. Though I confess, when my son is screaming in the backseat and I really want to get home and feed him, I get quite frustrated when trying to get around a bike.
Personally, I think there should be more consideration on both sides, but if you are riding a bike for recreation (in your little fancy spandex) then you could atleast pick a roadway that has more then one lane of traffic in each direction.
Posted on September 20, 2006 11:08 AM
.......oh, and I still say you are paying for the right for your car to travel on the road (unless your bike is your sole transportation) I think cyclist who use the road should have to register and pay taxes on their "vehicle" just like the owners of the other ones do. AND you should be ticketed when you do not follow ALL the rules of the road.
Posted on September 20, 2006 11:10 AM
I personally don't like to see bikers on busy roads, or any road for that matter. I have a great fear that as I pass they will hit a rock and be thrown in my path. What a horrible thing for them and me.
I also have a personal anger at bikers. A dear friend who whipped breast cancer twice was an avid biker. As she rode along one morning, a driver came around a curve and could not avoid hitting and killing her. A wonderful person was killed and a man's life was destroyed.
Posted on September 20, 2006 12:19 PM
Carol,
bikers didnt kill your friend. they arent to blame for it. Bikers can become about the same nuissance as skateboarders sometimes. how about the drivers that feel the need to squeeze themselves into lanes where you have given the car in front of you enough space to avoid hitting him if he rides his brakes.
on a brighter note, i saw this hot chick biking and using the proper turn signals. Kinda made me want to get a bike.
Posted on September 20, 2006 12:54 PM
A side note:
The area around Grandover Parkway is an excellent place to ride your bike for recreation. There is very little traffic on the road (I think it turns to Wiley Davis road) and there are two lanes going each direction.
Posted on September 20, 2006 1:11 PM
I am a conscientious bike rider of sorts; I stay off main roads but the neighborhood road is my home territory. When car on car accidents go to zero, and cars don't speed, when cars don't violate school zones, when drivers stop reading, writing, talking on cell-phones, reading maps, and putting on make up and when they don't cut off bikers, then I will revisit my response of: This is my road too.
Carol, I feel for your loss, my anger is probably directed at the driver especially if this happened in a neighborhood street. Why was the driver breaking the speed limit. I think that we should keep cars off the road. Our insurance rates would certainly go down.
Posted on September 20, 2006 5:08 PM
i live in pa we do not pay property tax on cars ha ha
Posted on September 20, 2006 8:32 PM
Joe, it was not the driver's fault. He was not negligent, just did not see the biker in time. I know that bikers have rights, but it doesn't make any difference who is right if the rider is killed. I am just angry and sad that this wonderful person is dead. Our consolation is that she died doing what she loved to do.
It is amazing that there are not more car accidents, given the careless way some drive.
Posted on September 21, 2006 8:16 AM
Carol, you do not need to respond to this email;
I just wanted to reiterate my previous expression of sympathy. I know what it is to lose a dear friend who is also a wonderful person. I know that you will cherish your memories with her as I do with my late friends.
Joe
Posted on September 21, 2006 9:57 AM
Hi Carol, I knew Gladys and Owen well, rode with them ofter, Loved 'em dearly! She died because the motorist was not driving in a prudent manner, not through fault of her own.
Posted on September 21, 2006 12:29 PM
You are blessed, as are all who knew and loved her, Jack. We taught together for several years and had ties through our families. When I speak of anger, it is not aimed at her but just at the loss.
Posted on September 21, 2006 1:52 PM