Article was unfair to former principal
The article on the former principal of Grimsley, Rob Gasparello, is absurd. It was filled with a bunch of speculation. Then the journalist interviewed some sophomores and juniors. Why not get the opinion of somebody who has been there for four years? It's ridiculous to bash the man when he did so many great things for the school. He was the best thing to happen to that school.
Why must this paper continue to be so biased?
Brett Bloomquist
Greensboro
Comments (13)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
"He was the best thing to happen to that school"
Why?
Posted on November 2, 2006 8:46 AM
"The article on the former principal of Grimsley, Rob Gasparello, is absurd. It was filled with a bunch of speculation. "
Welcome to the world of the News & Record.
They never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
Posted on November 2, 2006 9:27 AM
Opinions are truly like rectal cavities, not only does everybody have one, but they're often rather nasty.
Often hell, generally.
I agree with Nit on this one, if you're going to dispute something it's always beneficial to submit at least some obscure iota of factual support for your assertion.
"He was the best thing to happen to that school" doesn't qualify.
Posted on November 2, 2006 9:44 AM
There is a lot more to this story than the N&R printed. This LTE was obviously from one of Gasparello's biggest fans, and it should be taken that way.
Being aware of many of the issues, I believe the N&R did a great service by NOT going into much more detail.
Posted on November 2, 2006 10:29 AM
hello demondeacon, are you connected to Grimsley?....i am a parent of 2 children there and one coming up...there are so many rumors swirling about the events that led up to the day where it was announced he was no longer principal, and then there are so many rumors swirling as to why it happened so abruptly on that day...there are no facts apparently out there, so what do you hear or know that can help separate fact from fiction? Go Deacs beat BC
Posted on November 2, 2006 11:38 AM
Marksman,
No need to worry as this had been coming on for quite some time. Having attended or watched replay of school board meetings, there was a group from NCAE and even PTA from Grimsley making comments at one of the meetings not long ago.
Some elementary school principals are great principals but ONLY in elementary school situations. Some can make the leap into the lion's den of high school and some are not equipped. Grimsley will be great because of the feeders into its IB program and because of its tradition.
Without speaking out of school, I cannot say much more. But I would encourage you to stay active and to not worry about WHY in this instance. There were fans on both sides, but most of the ones in the know, felt strongly that a change was in order. It is not a bad thing.
Go DEACS!!
Posted on November 2, 2006 1:13 PM
its way too early to claim that 'its not a bad thing'...its definitely a good thing for those, who as you say, who were 'in the know' and who worked so hard together to force him out, but if they are still just exchanging high fives instead of realizing that there was no plan in place for what comes next, then their victory is so hollow and no one really cares to see those people around now...as you wrote there are fans on both sides, so the current landscape is a school (students, teachers, parents) divided and therefore the downtown administration, in its zeal to make the abrupt and unprecedented change, has left the students, teachers, and parents to pick up the pieces...and now with the fiery loss of a high school, a solution for GHS from downtown will move further down the totem pole, but maybe the silver lining is that those who i understand were excellent administrators and staff at EGHS maybe could move right into GHS, where they are so desperately needed...in summary, as the Gasparello story has unfolded and the days have passed since his abrupt dismissal, it has evidently turned into a bad thing with a school divided, and still no plan in place to turn it into a good thing...the only good thing on the horizon is a state football championship...Go Whirlies!
Posted on November 2, 2006 4:01 PM
Marksman,
It was not an "abrupt" dismissal except to those folks who had not been paying attention. Complaints had risen to a fever pitch and calls were not being returned etc. for quite a while. All personnel changes can be challenging, but again, Grimsley survives no matter who the Principal is. The Rhino had some good coverage on the issue, so you might want to pick up a copy. Again, this was not a "spur of the moment" decision.
Posted on November 2, 2006 7:30 PM
The one fact that is out there is that is was a 'spur of the moment' decision which does of course then make it abrupt...done on a random weekday which had important events scheduled for even that day and that week that included him, that is more evidence of abrupt and spur of the moment...plus there was no one already selected to take his place (there still is not)...if the complaints had over time risen to a fever pitch, then obviously that makes it abrupt because then all those months/years of complaining would've given the downtown administration plenty of time to have planned a smooth transition....sorry deacon but you are incorrect on this point...powerful gso attorney folks and powerful GHS alumni in this community made sure the end was abrupt; it didnt take too many people to bring it to an abrupt end....its not what you know in gso, but who you are and who you know...and there still aint too much leverage if you are a yankee....
Posted on November 2, 2006 7:58 PM
Well, there are two kinds of Yankees and it depends on which one you are. You see, Yankees are like hemorrhoids, if they come down and then go back, they are a blessing. If they come down and stay, they're a pain in the ass! :)
This may have seemed abrupt to you, but it was in the works for a while.
Posted on November 2, 2006 10:14 PM
Deacon - r u M or F?...
Look I understand that these people were working hard to get him out and yes that means 'it was in the works for a while'...but this was not anyone's plan, not even these power-based gso people who took him down with their close ties to school board members....it was not theirs or anyone's plan to take him out on a random weekday and have no contingency plan in place, unless as you wrote above, their plan is 'Grimsley survives no matter who is principal'...because that is another point you are incorrect on, it is a school that is starved for strong leadership and thrives, not survives, on strong leadership, it does not just run itself, even if there is a local power-base that can take out anyone they dont care for...
and as for the possible 'good thing' of a state football championship, ultimately what took Gasparello out ABRUPTLY on that wednesday was his decision to take the players who were averaging D's and F's on their just-released progress reports off the team and back into their books...the power-base took that as the last straw...Yankee went home...
Posted on November 2, 2006 11:39 PM
Well, this last comment is fascinating. I know nothing about Grimsley. But I recall that a very much respected (black) Principal was fired from Andrews a few years ago for allowing academic ineligibles to play varsity sports. There was a lot of controversy about whether what he did merited so harsh a punishment. I note that Andrews has had problems, and has not fielded a championship team, since then. Now you are saying that Gasparello was fired for pulling these same kids off a team. If it was right to fire the guy from Andrews, then Gasparello should not have been fired for this. Sounds like a double standard here. Not that I find it surprising, just disgusting. I'm pretty sure that the Andrews guy was not one of Grier's favorites, and that's why he got the fast ax. Did Gasparello challenge Dr. Grier's infinite wisdom?
Posted on November 3, 2006 12:29 PM
I believe Grier would believe that Gasparello did good enough work so far with Guilford County Schools enough so to keep him employed and 'promote' him (he was not fired, he is still a GCS employee as fas as i know) to help launch 2 new elementary schools...I believe if you graded Gasparello on his tenure at Grimsley, he would not receive much more than average marks, a C or maybe a C+...he did one thing at that school that everyone agrees on and really appreciates and will miss for which he would grade an A+, that he kept it safe and sound and under control...on the rest of his reponsibilities as lead administrator though he was average or below average...he ended up consumed with keeping Grimsley operating safely and soundly and under control so that he was there 24/7, and that was not healthy and also contributed to his demise - he was fried, burnt out...another reason why his dismissal was abrupt, because he meeded to be put into a fresh and new challenge, for his own well-being...
Posted on November 3, 2006 4:53 PM