Coverage of president's speech lacked balance
On Jan. 23, I watched President Bush deliver his State of the Union speech to Congress. I love my morning newspaper at breakfast, and I looked forward to reading the speech on Wednesday and public comments.
My first look should have warned me. Your lead story came not from the Associated Press or some other professional source but from The New York Times, generally understood to be the core of anti-Bush prejudice. Before I could turn to an inside page, I saw comments elicited from four college professors. I dislike generalizing, but aside from Democrat officials, I do not know of any group more generally perceived to be opposed to anything Bush proposes than college professors. All four quoted by you found fault with the president's proposals.
I think in seeking local comments, you might have consulted Greensboro business or professional people, unless you were actually wanting adverse comments.
I will still enjoy my breakfast newspaper but will question your distinction of editorial and objective reporting.
Dick Douglas
Greensboro