News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Letters to the Editor

« Coble's office must be averse to e-mail, too | Main | The country was much better off with Clinton »

Proposed tax is unfair to state's homeowners

As the state legislature works through the ominous process of building the state's budget, let us not stoop to using the proposed home transfer tax as a means to generate additional revenue.

Yes, the state has critical needs. Always has. Always will. We can find a way to meet these needs without taxing homeownership.

Homeowners, individually and collectively, are the very reason we have such a high quality of life in North Carolina. Homeownership means strong families, strong communities and strong economies.

The proposed home tax would force homeowners to pay one percent on the price of their home when they sell their property. That's $2,000 on a $200,000 house.

This home tax would single out one group of citizens (those choosing to sell their homes) to pay for infrastructure and services that benefit everyone. These are not newcomers but current residents who have been paying property taxes already.

This home tax is not fair. Simply put, it's a bad idea. This is one legislator who will vote "no" on taxing our homeowners in this state. I hope my colleagues in the legislature will join me.

To learn more about this important issue, people can visit the Web site www.itsabadidea.org.

Jerry C. Dockham
Denton

The writer represents the 80th House District, Davidson County.

Comments (4)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

Darryl [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

While this is a volitile issue in NC. Dear Jerry fails to mention how there is a segment of the populus that also uses these same services referenced. Yet, this segment, in all likelihood, does not pay any property tax even though vehicles are owned. Sales tax are basically the only tax this segment pays.

So, until a better way of collecting property tax is set up, something has to be done to balance the budget. Sadly, raising taxes has to happen as our population increases with the greater needs that come with the population increase.

There are several issues involved in the unmentioned issues in the previous two paragraphs. Those NEED to be addressed before increasing taxes. Until ALL politicians have the backbone to address those with the same vigor that this home sales tax has been will anything constructive transpire.

Shalom

6stringsamurai [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Even though I'd rather have a new home than a used one, i say add that tax into new homes. I await with eye-rolling glee when they figure out a renter's tax

Yvonne [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

It seems to me this proposal is another form of double taxation. However, that's not really anything new, is it?

nitpicker [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Yvonne,

I agree. Tax you on the property that you own, then tax you when you sell it. Not to mention the fees you pay when you buy a home.

I'm beginning to think the benefits of home-ownership is a big lie.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.