The following is a Counterpoint
By Don Hallock
I refer to the July 19 Counterpoint in which the author takes to task the movie "Sicko" and those in the media who favorably reviewed it.
Michael Moore can be overly forceful, but I have yet to see any of his critics offer proof that he told any lies in his movie. Calling someone a liar just because you disagree with him doesn't cut it with me.
In 1948, Harry Truman, hardly a far lefty, called for universal health coverage. I agreed with him then and agree with him now.
Where America ranks in the developed world in infant mortality, life expectancy, etc., should make every American angry and embarrassed.
Why don't we have a universal single-payer system? The answer is simple. It's the hundreds of millions of dollars that the insurance and other lobbies spend to defeat it. Our leaders just can't bring themselves to vote against their big-spending buddies. And many ordinary citizens are taken in by their clever propaganda.
I have asked my conservative friends if they thought every child born in America should receive decent health care. They always say yes.
Then when I detail what that would entail, they say, "Oh no. That would require more big government -- as everybody knows, big government can't do anything right."
Gee, why do I have the notion that Social Security, Medicare and the Postal Service run amazingly well?
I ask my friends if they're aware that our leaders in Washington enjoy exactly what I'm suggesting, even as they deny this benefit to us. They never have an answer.
People terrified by the "S word" point out that when Canada instituted it, some physicians fled to the U.S. True, we were easy to flee to. Where will our doctors flee to?
People also point out there can be a wait for elective procedures.
True, Canada has not yet fully adjusted, in terms of numbers of doctors and ample infrastructure. This will correct in time, and it will not be a problem here.
MRI machines and other high-tech devices abound here and sometimes sit idle.
We spend 30 percent of our health dollars administering our clumsy system. If we went the single-payer route, the figure would reduce to 10 percent, according to experts. This saved 20 percent would quite likely cover those not presently insured.
Do the math and let's get on with it.
The writer lives in Greensboro.