The following is a Counterpoint:
By Wayne Smyth
With the Michael Vick case getting 24/7 news coverage, there is scarcely anyone who hasn't been exposed to his plight, which is self-caused. The NFL star screwed up, has pleaded guilty, and will serve his sentence. Afterwards, the question is, will he play again in he NFL?
Well, that's someone else's decision and will have no bearing on my day-to-day living. Let him play for all I care.
That said, I'd like to address something I really resent. Recently, both the NAACP and PETA have issued comparisons between dogfighting for profit and outdoor sports hunting. The two are hardly the same. One actually is a federal and state felony and blatantly illegal; the other is part of our heritage and, within certain guidelines, is protected by law.
Hunters have no interest in exploiting, torturing or maiming their quarry. They go for the quick, clean kill, or pass up the shot. They use what they take and take only what they can use. The real culprits are the poachers, who are criminals. In fact, law-abiding hunters, who detest poachers, provide valuable information to game authorities in order to apprehend these criminals.
Hunters also pay the revenue, making wildlife habitat possible. Developers have done far more damage to wildlife than hunters ever will.
I share the outrage with PETA over dogfighting, but not its fanaticism. I will still consume meat and dairy products on occasion. I will not begrudge the opportunity for farmers, ranchers, hunters, fishermen and the like to make an honest living. I will respect people's pets and wildlife and oppose cruelty to animals.
And, I will still hunt whenever I feel the need to get outdoors during hunting season. Certain animals were put on this planet for subsistence. Others make fine pets and companions. Still others are simply fascinating forms of wildlife to watch. To animal-rights groups, I say, get real.
The writer lives in Fieldale, Va.