Democrats look for ways to assist the terrorists
Congressional Democrats and Islamic terrorists, whom the Democrats strive to protect, both cling to the past. The terrorists still think it's the 11th century, while the Dems still believe it's the 1970s, when the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was introduced. Just as the terrorists have refused to join the 21st century, the Democrats still think that communications technology is '70s vintage. Why?
To score points with the fringe, lunatic Web sites that fund them. The result? Getting our soldiers killed.
Last May, three U.S. soldiers were taken hostage by al-Qaida terrorists and two were killed. Instead of immediately springing into action, our intelligence officials were hamstrung for nearly 10 hours seeking approval (as demanded by Democrats) for wiretapping the terrorists despite the fact that the calls were between two parties in Iraq. Another disgusting example of Democrats trying to protect terrorists, thereby endangering our troops.
How could these traitors mangle the FISA laws to this extent? Because, though the calls were within Iraq, they passed through fiber optic cables located in the United States. The Democrats know this but are desperate to protect terrorists. They are invested in defeat. If we win, they lose. They've bet on the terrorists!
Tony Moschetti
High Point
Comments (5)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
"But the FISA law was not the cause of the delay. It allows instant surveillance with a 72-hour window after the fact to obtain the legal warrant. It's been this way since the start, and Congess has (at least for now) temporarily expanded wiretapping without a warrant."
Good ole Tony. Never one to allow facts to get in the way of a good rant. At least he learned how to spell Democrat correctly.
Posted on November 3, 2007 4:25 AM
If Tony's hero, poor, pitiful GWB had not sent our troops on a wild goose chase in Iraq, our troops would not have been there to have their lives taken by terrorists. The ultimate responsibility for the deaths of our soldiers in Iraq lies squarely on the shoulders of the fool in the WH, GWB. Any attempt to make it the fault of democrats shows how desperate some people are to take the spotlight off of the guilty, this administration.
Posted on November 3, 2007 10:49 AM
TLC, it's your turn to call the "guys!" He's out again!
Rufus, when has neo EVER allowed the facts, reason, etc to get in the way of a good rant?
Yvonne, I would add the Congress to the list of those responsible for the lives of those dead soldiers.
Shalom
Posted on November 3, 2007 11:26 AM
Was October a short month? How did Mostshitti get another one of his ridiculous blurbs through AGAIN!
This guy is a one note organ.
His whole raison d'etre is:
Dems = Bad
GOP = Good
How does this guy function in society with such indefensible garbage flowing out of his mouth like:
"The Democrats know this but are desperate to protect terrorists. They are invested in defeat. If we win, they lose. They've bet on the terrorists!"
When we hear about he "bottom of the barrel" or about "bottom feeders", we can rest assured that Tony is down there among them. His letters are ALWAYS devoid of reasonable arguments but do provide a laugh to all educated people who read his drivel. He is probably the one everyone tries to avoid at the Christmas, Thanksgiving or any other family gatherings. Hell, he even gives real 'conservatives' a bad name!
Posted on November 5, 2007 4:59 PM
Tony,
If everything you state were true, then everything in this link is true:
http://quinnell.us/politics/essay/hatesoldiers.html
Tony, get a new schtict! Your diatribes are tired and worthless. Playing "buttboy" to every Republican and buttering your britches every time Bush utters a word is not only laughable, but downright demeaning to those Republicans who show love of country, and love of Americans. See a doctor and ask about some of the new medications for OCD. You really need some help!
Posted on November 5, 2007 5:05 PM