News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Letters to the Editor

« Reader forms opinions without columnists' help | Main | Plans for research park don't impress neighbor »

Narrow residential streets may create more problems

I was shocked to read the article in Fast Forward, "Greensboro is slimming down streets" (Oct. 29). The article reports that, beginning Jan. 1, the city will drop the minimum width of the streets from 30 to 26 feet, will rein in the speed of traffic and make walking more comfortable and pleasant. That's great.

Did the City Council ever consider leaving the width as is and marking off designated bike lanes? How is this city ever going to be considered bicycle-friendly if it starts making the streets less wide? I have to believe that, as in most cases, it all comes down to dollars and not common sense.

While you're at it, did anyone ask fire and police how they like the idea of slimmer roads in residential neighborhoods? It must be exciting to try to get those big hook-and-ladder/pump trucks down slimmer streets for emergencies.

Perhaps the title of the article should have been, "Greensboro is slimming down streets while adding pounds to its residents."

Troyce Hood
Greensboro

Comments (2)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

Buz [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

t.hood,
you made some valid points. let's apply some math to this reduced road width issue. i will make some assumptions in my calculation (i.e. avg. car width=5').
with the road at 26' wide - with a vehicle parked (assumption#2 is 6" away from curb) in front on homes on both sides of the street now reduces the drivable road width to 15' - now place a vehicle travelling in both directions, these two cars take up 10' of those 15', leaving 15" on either side of both vehicles. now 30" (15" either side of each car) of manuverable area doesn't seem like much room for error to me. but then again i've noticed many n.c. drivers fancy themselves as nascar drivers so this reduced area might just excite them ! good luck to all those driving on narrower roads. i just thought of something....this could be a windfall for us tax payer - if road widths are reduced by 13.3% will our road tax dollars be reduced :-) ---nay verily me thinks.

Troyce,
As a write-in candidate for Mayor of Greensboro and someone who rides a 200 MPG motorized bicycle as my primary means of transportation I too am very concerned with how Greensboro streets are designed and traffic laws enforced.
http://www.musecrafters.com/bloggingpoet/2601/Write-in+Billy+Jones+For+Mayor+Of+Greensboro.html

Stay safe out there and don't become a victim of the cagers.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.