News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Letters to the Editor

« What Greensboro wants for its 200th birthday | Main | Annie Penn has received a death blow »

Young people can fight at 18 but can't buy beer?

In her March 28 letter, "A lower drinking age helps bars, not teens," Carolyn Corbett raises the issue of a lower drinking age. Her only argument against lowering the drinking age to 18 is that a person could buy alcohol while in high school.

What she does not include is that at 18 a person is a legal adult. At 18, a person can live by himself, fight in the military, vote in general elections and get married. So, some people are not allowed to sip champagne at their own weddings. In North Carolina, a 16-year-old can be charged as an adult for committing a crime.

The lower drinking age would help teens by giving them a choice on how to run their lives.

Edward Krasula
Greensboro

Comments (8)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

rahrah [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

hooray.

depression's no fun if you cant drink.

Mark [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

"The lower drinking age would help teens by giving them a choice on how to run their lives."

Even though I am on your side, Edward, this is a pretty weak argument. Consumption of alcohol usually leads to more bad decisions than good ones. It's best you leave this one out when making your case for lowering the drinking age.

brian444 [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Edward, the government is your friend--an older, wiser friend. Why would it let you choose anything, since it knows better? And not only is government wise; it is beneficent, too, dispensing billions of its own dollars to help people just like you. Let's not question the government: it's there to help. Instead, let's just quietly and respectfully wait until we're 21 to buy beer.

(Or just do like everybody else and get a fake ID.)

brian444 [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Edward, the government is your friend--an older, wiser friend. Why would it let you choose anything, since it knows better? And not only is government wise; it is beneficent, too, dispensing billions of its own dollars to help people just like you. Let's not question the government: it's there to help. Instead, let's just quietly and respectfully wait until we're 21 to buy beer.

(Or just do like everybody else and get a fake ID.)

Tim Lawrence [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

"The lower drinking age would help teens by giving them a choice on how to run their lives."

For a second, I thought you said "ruin" their lives.

I understand your plight. I'm 47 years old, have been married, have voted, and been disqualified for serving in the military.

And I still can't buy pot.

rahrah [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Pot's easier to get than liquor when you're underage.

verelse [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Actually, one can enlist at 16 1/2 and report for duty on one's 17th birthday...I know because I graduated high school early, and went off to boot camp the summer after my 17th.
At one time some states (Georgia, Wisconsin, California, et al.) made exception to the drinking age for active duty military. I am not sure but I understand that the exception is based on Federal law and is still in force. The problem at that time, of course, was lack of knowledge on the part of bar owners and bouncers, meaning one could gain access only near military bases where bar owners were only too eager to comply with the law. States were allowed to enforce stricter rules and thereby bar active duty military despite the Federal exception.
I think it is ludicrous to expect someone to willingly make the choice to go into battle and then pretend they are not wise enough to choose to drink a beer. We should make the Federal drinking age exemption mandatory for active duty military nationwide and require compliance for any establishment seeking a permit to sell or serve alcoholic beverages. All that is required to be served is proof of age or an active duty military identification card.
If we cannot do that, we should then raise the age for enlistment to 21. This is a simple case of hypocrisy on the part of those that advocate a high drinking age.
My son had his last three birthdays in Iraq. His most recent tour (the "surge") lasted 15 months during which he had his 21st and 22nd birthdays. Yet before he left for this deployment, at age 20, he could not legally possess or consume a beer. Plain and simple hypocrisy.

THE LIBERAL CONSERVATIVE [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

This is but a tempest in a teapot.

Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.