News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Letters to the Editor

« Obama offers government that provides everything | Main | Critic of local residents might want to move away »

U.S. money spent in Iraq should be utilized here

Is it just me? Am I imagining things? It seems as though the federal government, those dear simpletons of 2005, are continuing their vast improvement of operational abilities in the face of natural catastrophes. We have watched the government in action combating the California wildfires, combating insurmountable flooding, and now implementing near flawless preparation/operation during seasonal hurricanes (and perhaps several more). It seems as though Washington decided not to repeat the debacle that ensued after Hurricane Katrina.

Good for them. Great for the individuals living along the Gulf Coast.

Now if I can just figure out why my tax dollars, and those that will be garnered from my future grandchildren, are being used to destroy a once-sovereign country and then help reconstruct it.

Why are the monies taxed from countless citizens not being utilized to rebuild the Crescent City?

Roderick Brown
Greensboro

Comments (3)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

I agree up to the point of rebuilding NO. Is this not a city Al Gore tells us that going to under water in a few years. Seems foolish to rebuild it, if its going to be under water! Also, I do not read a lot of letters about rebuilding the rest of the Gulf Coast.
Wonder why?

ghost from white oak [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Why should we pore all this money into rebuilding parts of a city that is lower than the river which runs by it?

Kornbluth [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Fair question, Ghost. Remeber New Orleans survived Katrina, as far as the actual hurricane goes. The devastation came when the federally built, federally owned, federally maintained levees gave way. Funds for maintenance of those levees had been dramatically cut by the president and congress before that. That led many to conclude there was a federal responsibility to compensate those who lost their home.

Having said that, a more appropriate compensation might be to provide homes above sea level, and let the low lying areas go back underwater.

Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.