Using negative advertising backfires on candidates
I don’t know about you, but I am sick and tired of politicians’ negative political advertisements. I just saw more Bev Perdue and Kay Hagan negative ads and really want the politicians to tell us what they stand for and what they will do for the citizens.
Producing and airing a negative ad tells us a great deal about the individual. Is this the role model we want for our children? Is this attitude indicative of the approach (blame others) they will adopt if elected? Politicians should be leaders. Leaders lead, they don’t point fingers and print innuendo.
I come from a political family; my father served as a Democrat in the General Assembly for more than 30 years. I never saw negative advertisements or statements used in a campaign. These ads make me want to rethink being a lifelong Democrat.
So, politicians, have some faith in the public. Don’t tell us why your opponent should not be elected. Tell us what you think about issues, why we should support you, and why you should be entrusted to represent us.
Randy Uzzell
Greensboro
Comments (7)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
I was actually glad to learn that Liddy Dole was not so good at thievery and ranked 93rd in that department.
"Uzzell'...
Wasn't he the one who opposed mandatory Handicapped Parking spaces in the front row?
hmmm
Posted on September 1, 2008 6:47 AM
Congress.org says Liddy is responsible for 111 earmarks totaling $147,818,000.
Posted on September 1, 2008 4:48 PM
Imagine how much damage the top ten could do.
Posted on September 1, 2008 5:58 PM
Just wait until
Sarah "Abstinence Only" Palin
gets elected!
The "Bridge to Nowhere" flip flopper is now the Thomas Eagleton of the 2008 campaign.
How long will it be before she backs out, or McCain forces her to back out? Tick, tick, tick, tick, tick......
Posted on September 1, 2008 8:26 PM
Top 10 Average something like $220 million apiece.
Posted on September 1, 2008 8:31 PM
I'd bet though that anybody who has got more than $0 in earmarks isn't doing anything but trying to raise their number.
Posted on September 1, 2008 8:35 PM
I'll vote for Bev if she promises to strive to be # 100.
Posted on September 2, 2008 6:29 AM