<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The Inside Scoop</title>
      <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/</link>
      <description>Dedicated to the political and civic scene in the Triad and North Carolina.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:35:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Did you vote like your commissioner?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[We caught up with Guilford County commissioners this week to see what they think now that the dust has settled on the May 6 votes for $671 million in bonds and the quarter-cent sales tax.

Guilford voters <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080506/NRSTAFF/53461774/-1/specsect0802">approved</a> all the <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080506/NRSTAFF/971399356/-1/specsect0802">bonds</a> except for the $20.2 million for parks. And they refused the sales tax.

But few commissioners managed to hold closely to what the voters <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/decision08/Copy%20of%20primary%20precinct%20results%20online.xls">wanted</a> in their districts.

Below is the list of what commissioners said they wanted before the election, which excludes at-large commissioners John Parks and Paul Gibson:

District 1, Bruce Davis: No to the $412 million school bond and jail bond. Yes to other bonds. Undecided on sales tax.

District 2, Steve Arnold: Yes on Eastern Guilford. No to the other bonds and sales tax.

District 3, Linda Shaw: Yes to bonds and sales tax.

District 4, Kirk Perkins: Yes on bonds and the sales tax.

District 5, Billy Yow: Yes on the jail bond and sales tax. No for the other bonds.

District 6, Kay Cashion: Yes on bonds and the sales tax.

District 7, Mike Winstead: Refused to give his position on the bonds or sales tax.

District 8, Melvin “Skip” Alston: Yes to Eastern Guilford. No to the other bonds and sales tax.

District 9, Carolyn Coleman: Did not comment.

]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/did_you_vote_li.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/did_you_vote_li.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Guilford County</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:35:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Taxes and the city budget</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Here's some extra fun stuff that didn't make it into the paper today ("<a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080508/NRSTAFF/315575800/-1/NEWS">Council cuts budget to avoid tax increase</a>"), in case you were dying to know all the gory details of this year's budget debate.

Council asked the city manager to keep the tax rate flat for next year. He offered them nearly a dozen ways to save or make the city money to get there. 

Here are some of the cuts they approved and items they kept in the budget:

Ways the city will save money:
$2 million: cuts for road repaving
$200,000 — no coliseum suite renovations
$1.65 million — delayed payoff of parking deck debts
$60,000 — reduced staff at lakes
$200,000 — cut landscape contract
$600,000 — revenue from increased refuse fees
$200,000 — savings from a rolling hiring freeze

Items the council will keep in the budget:
$550,000 — housing and community development fund
$65,000 — street light fund
$679,000 — nonprofit funding
$100,000 — neighborhood grants

Things I'd still like to know: how many street lights can you buy for $65,000? And how many roads will you pave with $2 million?]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/taxes_and_the_c.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/taxes_and_the_c.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Greensboro</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:47:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Speakers from the floor, Part II</title>
         <description><![CDATA[City Council is considering new rules for its speakers from the floor session, a regular public comment period at the beginning and end of each council meeting.

Councilman <strong>Zack Matheny</strong> recommended that council limit the first session of the meeting to city issues only. The session at the end of the meeting could be used for everything else.

The city's legal department ruling: <strong>No way</strong>. City Associate General Counsel Jamiah Waterman says the Constitution of the U.S. and state law are pretty particular on this point. 

Government can limit the "time, manner and place" speech takes place. But not the content.

<strong>Limiting speakers to city business would not be content-neutral,</strong> Waterman concludes in a memo to council (which you can <a href="http://mm.news-record.com/legacy/indepth/08/council_memo_43008.doc">read here</a>.)

And -- highlighting a point made by Councilwoman <strong>T. Dianne Bellamy-Small </strong>and others -- Waterman says "city business" is ambiguous, vague and gives too much discretion to council to determine who can and cannot speak.

"Depending up the circumstances, topics as varied as the war in Iraq, global warming, abortion or A&T's homecoming events can be considered city business,"Waterman wrote.

So, the speakers from the floor can keep doing what they do. Score one for the First Amendment, and the local residents of Crazytown.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/speakers_from_t.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/speakers_from_t.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Greensboro</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:55:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>So, we these get anonymous callers ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Most of the time, we simply ignore the calls asking for us to investigate the great ketchup famine of 1996 or the relationship of some elected official to Area 57.

This morning was a touch different when a caller asked about who pays for these <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/decision08/guilford_county_bonds/">bonds</a>, particularly the <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080507/NRSTAFF/298804200/-1/NEWS">school</a> bonds.

The caller wanted to know what happened to the North Carolina Education Lottery proceeds that were intended to build new schools. Then the caller implied that people who don't own property in Guilford County are probably the folks who voted for the bonds, because renters don't have to pay property tax.

We reported last year that the North Carolina Education Lottery wasn't putting up the revenue that was <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/Lottery.txt">expected</a>. Here's a handy <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/lottery%20011107.pdf">.pdf</a> showing the breakdown from the 2006-07 ticket sales.
While the lagging lottery isn't the only reason bond supporters used to justify that the schools needed the money, it is one of many factors.

As for the property-owners-only-pay-property-tax argument, it's true only to the extent that the person who owns the land pays the property tax bill. Rest assured, every time rent goes up for a person, a part of that increase also goes to cover higher property taxes.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/so_we_these_get.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/so_we_these_get.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Guilford County</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 10:41:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bonds! Oh, bonds!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<strong>Update:</strong> Here's today's <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080508/NRSTAFF/594718971">story</a> on the 2007-08 county budget. What do you want your board of commissioners to fund?

After Tuesday, when most bonds in Guilford County received the nod from <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080506/NRSTAFF/971399356">voters</a>, you can likely count on a couple things happening in the 2008-09 budget.

Some commissioners will likely mention that voters could have made things easier in by passing the quarter-cent sales tax. Property tax may well go up. And there could even be more cuts.

All that comes at a time when food stamp claims are <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080416/NRSTAFF/513488403/-1/news">increasing</a> at the Department of Social Services, the Sheriff's Office was required to add 28 deputies at the beginning of the year that will be permanent positions and many of the community groups that were cut in last year's budget want to get back on <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/Copy%20of%20CBO%20Apps%20for%2008-09%20%20%204-28-08.xls">board</a>.

One Soopster mentioned after tonight's Primary results came in that "the real election begins tomorrow."

Nay. Budget season begins tomorrow.

Now all those things that Guilford commissioners talked <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080424/NRSTAFF/199844322/-1/newsrecrssarkive">about</a> - particularly tax increases - are going to come up.

And the referenda that passed only technically gives the board the clearance to issue the bonds. They don't have to, and they don't have to issue them for the full amount.

Soon we can see what the commissioners think about this upcoming budget season.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/bonds_oh_bonds.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/bonds_oh_bonds.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Guilford County</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:37:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&quot;Loving pizza is the common denominator of human existence&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[At the Hillary Clinton rally <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080502/NRSTAFF/244135154">today</a> we ran into a Guilford College senior wearing a body-sized triangular suit that had a photo of a slice of pizza.

"Loving pizza is the common denominator of human existence," Johanna Breed told Scoop. The statement might be the truest piece of almost-political rhetoric that Scoop has ever <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/pizza%20girl%202.aup">heard</a>
 (27 second mp3).

Breed said she was there to shoot for a spot as Hillary's running-mate. But after a while Breed showed her true colors. She supports Barack Obama in the presidential primary, and only happened to have the costume on hand.

"I'm actually an Obama supporter, but I just thought this was funny," she said. Though if Clinton approached her, the Guilford College art major might reconsider, Breed <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/pizza%20girl%203.aup">said</a> (44 second mp3).

Clinton's press secretary hasn't gotten back to Scoop about the chances of a Clinton/Pepperoni ticket in 2008.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/loving_pizza_is.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/loving_pizza_is.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General Politics</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:35:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bagpipes and proclamations in Guilford County</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A half-hour of recognitions preceded the regular business in Thursday's Guilford County commissioners meeting, and they spanned from naming bridges to hearing bagpipes.

In a somber moment, the board named the Eugene/Elm Street bridge over I-40/85 in honor of L.E. Pace, a state trooper who died while on-duty in 1963.

The High Point Central High School Men of Valor Excelling program was recognized for receiving the President's Volunteer Service Award.

And then there were bagpipes. Redhead Commissioner Linda Shaw (she's a Republican, too)read the proclamation recognizing April as national Scots, Scots-Irish Heritage Month. Bagpiper David Thomas <a href="http://guilford.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=211&meta_id=22536">serenaded</a> the board. (The bagpipe starts at 37 minutes in the video.)

Also, May is now the month for foster care awareness and mental health month. And The week starting May 4 is arson awareness week.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/proclomations_a.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/05/proclomations_a.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Guilford County</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:07:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Records check</title>
         <description>Looks like most candidates for office in Guilford County have been keeping their nose clean.

A background check of those involved in contested primaries next Tuesday found very few who have had brushes with the law, not counting minor traffic violations.

Those who have include two candidates for the Guilford County Board of Commissioners.

Incumbent Billy Yow, who faces two Republican primary opponents in his bid to keep the District 5 seat, was convicted in 1981 of driving while impaired. 

E.H. Hennis, who is in the Republican primary for two at-large seats up for grabs, was convicted in 2000 of creating a bomb hoax during a commissioners meeting in 1998.

Apart from those candidates, you&apos;ve got some speeding tickets, but that&apos;s about it.



 
</description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/records_check.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/records_check.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:42:07 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Move your soapbox to the end of the meeting</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Of late, the Greensboro city council has been inundated with folks who'd like their three minutes at the public podium.

At the council's public comment session at the beginning of each meeting, there are citizen groups asking for help or promoting an event. Then there are folks who have less important things to do with their designated public comment time <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/city_council_yo.shtml">("City council, you've been Punk'd")</a>.

With that in mind, Councilman Zack Matheny floated a plan to limit the 30 minutes of public comment to city-related issues only. Folks who want to talk about anything else can wait for the second public comment period at the end of the council meeting. 

Matheny said some people were taking advantage of the council. 

"We need to set policy for the city of Greensboro. Let's focus on city business," Matheny said.

His request was met by all the right questions from his fellow council members. How could they implement this new rule fairly? How can they do it without violating constitutional rights of free speech? What about issues that don't concern the city, but might be interesting to hear?

They didn't vote on his proposal, but instead asked for the city legal staff to do a little research first.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/a_soapbox_free.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/a_soapbox_free.shtml</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:14:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The budget, and healthcare in 27406</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Guilford County's health department saw its initial request to improve access to healthcare in the <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080317/NRSTAFF/182598062/-1/life10">27406</a> ZIP code reduced by half to $250,000 in preparing the 2008-09 budget, according to Merle Green, director of public health.

That reduction could be a harbinger of more lean times for other county departments as County Manager David McNeill works on his recommended 2008-09 budget. The Board of Commissioners will review the budget in May and approve it in June.

This year's budget season could be especially difficult, considering that voters may approve up to $671 million in <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/decision08/guilford_county_bonds/">bonds</a>, and the board already asked McNeill to make a budget with no property tax rate increase in addition to the one he'll recommend.

Any new bond will likely cause the county's property tax rate to rise.

Along with the county department requests, several community groups traditionally receiving funding were cut from the current 2007-08 budget and <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/Copy%20of%20CBO%20Apps%20for%2008-09%20%20%204-28-08.xls">hope</a> to get back on the books in 2008-09.

And one more thing could hold sway for some board members. The election itself.

The May 6 primary will settle the bonds decision and three races for commissioner. But two At Large commissioners and the District 4 race will be settled in November, after the budget is approved.

Oh, and everything seems to be getting more <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080424/NRSTAFF/739892210/-1/news06">expensive</a>.

In all those factors, are there any issues that you hope are covered in our work on the 2008-09 budget? List them in comments, or e-mail <a href="mailto:gerald.witt@news-record.com">me</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/the_budget_and.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/the_budget_and.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Guilford County</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:29:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Is Arnold ready to talk?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Scoop found Guilford County Commissioner Steve Arnold by phone Thursday, who said he might be ready to talk sometime about the bankruptcy proceedings and other <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080219/NRSTAFF/618896512">things</a> he’s facing lately.

Arnold used words like “politically fatal” to describe how he’s handled talking about the case so far. Which is to say that Arnold hasn’t spoken much on it at all.

When Scoop asked Arnold if he’d be available soon — he does have another court date May 8  — he said that he may get back to us sometime around then.

We're looking forward to the conversation. Arnold said that he's got some factual information that he wants out there, and that our reports were a little off.

"I can point out all kinds of mistakes and various issues that were wrong," he said.

Well, that can happen when we don't get someone's side of the story, or they don't want to <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080307/NRSTAFF/600038019/-1/NEWS02">talk</a>.

Inside Scoop is always open.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/ready_to_talk.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/ready_to_talk.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Guilford County</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:45:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Opening the can o&apos; worms</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This could become a situation similar to the kid caught chewing gum in class, when the teacher asks if there's enough for everybody.

A few weeks ago, Guilford County Commissioner Carolyn Coleman asked for an estimate on quarterly mileage reimbursements for volunteers on the county's nursing home advisory committee and the adult care committee.

Apparently the committemembers put a bunch of miles on their cars in the duty of running around and checking up on nursing homes and adult care facilities. They don't receive any per-mile reimbursement, and gas isn't getting cheaper, she noted.

County Manager David McNeill gave a cost estimate today: $10,000 a year.

The conversation is expected to continue next week in the county commissioners meeting.

But if those boards receive reimbursements, who else should? Is this an all-or-nothing deal for the other advisory boards and commissions? And where would the money come from?

Those were a few questions that Vice Chairwoman Kay Cashion and others had.

Questions that, McNeill said, only the board can answer.

Of the 60-plus advisory boards and commissions the county uses to run its business, just a few receive money. Planning board members receive $10 per meeting, for example. <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/Paid%20Boards.doc">Here</a>
are the others.

Could this kind of money be spread to all the boards, or is it fair to help those people putting miles on their cars to do the business of making sure our elderly are being treated well? Or is that simply the sacrifice someone makes to be a volunteer?

What if every volunteer was compensated for thier time on a board? What would change? What if nobody was?]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/opening_the_can.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/opening_the_can.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Guilford County</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:51:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Robert&apos;s rules of disorder</title>
         <description><![CDATA[When you're on a board that is as divisive as the Greensboro city council, sticking to strict rules of parlimentary procedure might just save you from total choas.

This week council had a debate about debate. Or, more specifically, how to end debate.

About 25 minutes into a dicussion about City Manager Mitchell Johnson, Councilwoman T. Dianne Bellamy-Small "called the question." In other words, she moved that the board vote on her motion to take the discussion back into council's closed session.

Debate continued anyhow. City attorney Becky Jo Peterson-Buie interrupted to remind council that a call for the question ends debate. She told them it was time to vote.

Councilman Mike Barber objected to her objection, arguing that a call for the question is just like any other motion. It must have a second and a vote before it is adopted to end the debate.

The city attorney persisted, and eventually council voteed and moved on with the meeting. 

But the question still lingered. The city attorney promised to research the issue.

Apparently, the belief that calling the question immediately ends debate is "a fairly common misconception," according to the <a href="http://www.robertsrules.com/">Robert's Rules of Order Web site</a>.

According to the site's FAQs:
"This is simply not the case. Any member who wishes to force an end to debate must first obtain the floor by being duly recognized to speak by the chair, and must then move the Previous Question. Such a motion must be seconded, and then adopted by a two-thirds vote, or by unanimous consent. It is not in order to interrupt a speaker with cries of "Question" or "Call the Question," and even if no one is speaking, it is still necessary to seek recognition." 

It should be duly noted that any local rules of procedure would supersede Roger's Rules. So we'll see what the city attorney turns up in her research.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/roberts_rules_o.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/roberts_rules_o.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Greensboro</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:41:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Meet your mayor, part two</title>
         <description>Do you carry a briefcase to work? Do you wear shiny shoes and a suit at least five days a week? 

Then this town hall meeting is for you!

Mayor Yvonne Johnson&apos;s second town hall meeting of the year will focus on the interests of the business community and Greensboro&apos;s economic future.

It will be held May 12 from 6 to 8 p.m. at the Greensboro Historical Museum. Seating is limited to the first 150 people, so you must RSVP to Roberta Frush at rfrush@greensboro.org.</description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/meet_your_mayor.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/meet_your_mayor.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Greensboro</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:28:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Got bonds?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[We're doing a story on the $671.6 million in Guilford County <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/decision08/guilford_county_bonds/">bonds</a> that people will vote on in the May 6 primary.

So as we report this story, what kinds of things would you like to know about the bonds? Do you wonder if this a good time for bonds, <a href="http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080406/NRSTAFF/475077182/-1/news06">considering</a> the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/business/economy/index.html">economy</a>? Do you think that the <a href="http://ivoteyesforkids.com/">schools</a>, <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/decision08/2008/04/parks_bonds_brochure.shtml">parks</a>, <a href="http://www.asaferguilfordcounty.com/">jail</a> and <a href="http://www.gtcc.edu/BOND/index.html">college</a> are needed now - no matter what?

What questions and answers would help you make a better choice on the bonds? E-mail <a href="mailto:gerald.witt@news-record.com">us</a> or post a comment below, and we'll try to get to them along the way.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/got_bonds.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/scoopblog/2008/04/got_bonds.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Guilford County</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:40:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
