News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News

a service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

» Home

Capital Beat

« April 2006 | Main | June 2006 »

May 2006 Archives

May 1, 2006

Rally

Greensboro has its own version of the pro-immigration rallies going on right now at the government plaza downtown. (Other activity on this front went down in Raleigh and elsewhere today.)

I was in town today and stopped to check it out, although I'd be hard pressed to report on what most of the speakers were saying…my Spanish is very poor.

But it looked to me like somewhere north of 1,000 folks turned up as of 4:45 p.m. A lot of them were holding placards and American flags. There were only two foreign flags in the crowd that I could see, both of them Mexican flags.

The Greensboro police were well in evidence, but didn’t seem to be terribly intrusive. I counted somewhere around 20 officers in uniform, including a trio on bicycle patrol and at least a couple guys on the roof-top of the Old County Courthouse.

All and all, there was music, there was cheering, it looked like a good time was being had by those in attendance when I left, right before 5 p.m.

My colleague Amy Dominello is compiling tomorrow’s report for the paper.

Oh, and I saw Ed Cone out there, so I expect he'll have a report too.

May 2, 2006

Squatting

I'm hanging over at the other blog today.

May 3, 2006

Speaker Black on Art Pope...and other stuff

House Speaker Jim Black had a sit-down with us scrubby media types today. The conversation was pretty wide ranging, mainly focused on the upcoming session.

For those who are interested, I've broken out some audio files so you can listen to the Speaker chat about your favorite topic.

There is a good deal of discussion throughout of Art Pope, the millionaire conservative Republican who leads one faction of the Republican Party. Pope faction defeated their arch-nemesis, Richard Morgan, on primary night. Morgan is a Republican but has worked with Black and his allies, helping in 2003 to form an historic if weird co-speakership. (For more on all that click here.

Now for the audio:

  • Click here for file A; covering the highlights of what Black thinks will be important this session. “This is going to be a good session, maybe the best one we’ve had in a long time, because we’re not dealing so much with a shortfall this time…”
  • Click here for file B; covering the first of many times Black T-s off on Art Pope. “Last night or yesterday was the culmination of a problem that has been brewing in this state for some time now. Art Pope with his millions and millions and millions of dollars made a great splash yesterday. He eliminated a great statesman in Richard Morgan…”
  • Click here for file C; covering another riff on Art Pope as well as a little on the Democratic agenda for the upcoming session. “I think what we do in this session improving education, jobs and health care is going to have more to do with what happens in November than any of those other things . . . you can take enough money and make a wart hog look good.”
  • Click here for file D; covering why Black thinks there might be an anti-incumbent sentiment this year. Hint: it's all the fault of us scrubby media types. “There are all kinds of reasons for an anti-incumbency mentality out there, and some of it is around this table here...”
  • Click here for file E; which is a long one, covering ethics legislations, Black's own ethics problems, video poker, keeping special provisions out of the budget, House rules and tax cuts.
  • Click here for file F; covering funding for mental health, the county share of Medicaid and possible state bond issues for education and water projects. “Yes, there’s a lot of interest in the House about mental health reform and better funding mental health care...”
  • Click here for file G; covering more on handling lottery proceeds and the minimum wage bill. “I never did like advertising to start with . . . when I see that TV ad, I think that’s the silliest thing I’ve ever seen. It’s a waste of money....”

As always, the comment lines are open.

Joining the club

It struck me that North Carolina was not mentioned on this Washington Post story regarding state legislatures cracking down on illegal immigration.

Is NC sitting on the sidelines in this debate?

Not really, given bills like the one mentioned in this story could get some traction in the General Assembly this summer.

More: Click here for the NCSL study mentioned in the post story.

May 4, 2006

Canned

In the following joint note from Speaker Black and Senate leader Basnight, they encourage folks to take part in a first day of session food drive:

Dear Friends:

Continuing what has become a tradition of giving and goodwill, the General Assembly will hold its 2006 Legislative Food Drive on Tuesday May 9, as part of the convening of the short session. The General Assembly began this tradition in 1995 and donations have increased steadily ever since – and with your help the 2006 food drive can far exceed our past successes.

Continue reading "Canned" »

There we go again. . .

I rarely see a politician target a journalist or a news organization as part of their campaign strategy and think, "Wow, that's going to do them some good at the polls." It has always seemed like a waste of resources to me.

This e-mail from Vernon Robinson is no different.

Mike Baker, the guy Robinson targets, is a new reporter for the AP's Raleigh bureau and seemed like a nice guy when I met him yesterday. As for Robinson's assertion that Baker is a "rabid leftist," I didn't notice him frothing at the mouth or anything.

By way of full disclosure, the news-record.com site used the story in question for some period of time but I don't think it made it into the paper.

Linkage:

The comment lines are open.

May 5, 2006

Friday Appointments

We haven't done one of these in a while. According to his office, Gov. Mike Easley has appointed:

  • Chip Roth of Greensboro to the North Carolina Commission on Workforce Development. Roth is an international representative with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. He is a member of the Future Fund and the Prelude Society. Roth received his Bachelor’s degree in communications from the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania. Board duties are to enhance and develop strategies that produce a skilled and competitive workforce through various powers and duties.

Who are you?

A couple weeks ago, I started getting mail and e-mail from a group called the Employment Policies Institute, most of it focuses on the much-talked-about minimum wage increase that the General Assembly will take in the session that starts next week.

Who is the Employment Policies Institute? That's the question I was asking anyway, since I'd never heard of these folks.

On their web site EPI calls itself " a non-profit research organization dedicated to studying public policy issues surrounding employment growth. In particular, EPI focuses on issues that affect entry-level employment."

Typical of their pitch is this from an e-mail today:

Decades of economic research conclude that mandated wage hikes eliminate entry-level jobs, putting particular pressure on minorities and the low-skilled. A Cornell University study found that black young adults typically bear almost four times the employment loss of their non-black counterparts after a minimum wage increase. Specifically, they found that a 10% increase in the minimum wage will result in an 8.5% decrease in employment for black young adults and teenagers.

“The truth of the matter is that minimum wage hikes make it more difficult for young adults to get their foot in the door and start acquiring the skills they need to get ahead in life,” said Michael Flynn, Director of Legislative Affairs for the Employment Policies Institute. “Policymakers must focus on the conditions of the nation's least skilled employees—those who will actually be affected by an increase. The most recent data from the Labor Department shows that these individuals are simply not enjoying the gains of the recent positive employment news.”


Really? You know, I hadn't heard any of this from the folks pushing the minimum wage in North Carolina, not that one expects and advocacy group to push against their own interest.

So who is EPI again?

Well, according to the Center for Media and Democracy EPI is a custom made think tank created by Restaurant-industry lobbyist Rick Berman of Berman & Co. (Btw...a critique of the Center for Media and Democracy is here, but to cut to the chase, they're a progressive think tank that does some pretty good investigation of corporate communication strategies.) And yes, the restaurant and bar lobby in North Carolina are some of the most vocal advocates opposing the minimum wage here.

So...EPI is a lobbyist-funded group. There's nothing about that on their "About Us" page.

So I sent an e-mail off to Alison Preszler, the group's communications director:

Alison:

Thanks for getting in touch. I had never heard of your group before and so took a look about, finding this report on the Center for Media and Democracy’s web site: http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues/2001Q1/berman1.html

Needless to say, that report doesn’t paint your group in a positive light and gives me a bit of heart burn in using any of your figures. Do you wish to straighten me out on some fact I may be missing?

Please keep in mind that in addition to writing for the newspaper I write a blog for our company (http://blog.news-record.com/staff/capblog/) and may use your response there.

Thanks very much.

--mark

I've not gotten a response as of this posting, but it has not been all that long and it is Friday afternoon.

Update: Alison e-mails back:

Mark –

Thanks for emailing me back.

The Employment Policies Institute was indeed founded by Rick Berman. We’ve never attempted to hide the fact that we are funded by businesses in many industries, foundations, and individuals. EPI does not conduct any research. EPI commissions research from leading economists at universities across the country.

We have a distinguished Advisory Board which includes a Nobel Laureate, a 2005 MacArthur Genius, and a former congressional budget office director. We have presented our research in testimony on the hill many times including just this week.

John Stauber obviously has an agenda and an axe to grind with any pro-business group. It’s safe to say that if you can’t beat the message then you’re forced to shoot the messenger. The truth of the matter is that minimum wage increases kill jobs and history and economics prove this fact. I will gladly bore you with studies dating back to the very first minimum wage increase in 1939 that attest to this economic fact.

Again, I appreciate the fact that you emailed me. If I can leave you with anything it’s the point that all of the research EPI promotes was conducted by economists at leading universities, all of whom will handily defend their work against the kind of anti-business smear campaigns such as Stauber’s.

If there are any particular points in Mr. Stauber’s blog that you would like me to address, please let me know.

Thanks.
Alison


So what of this Cornell study she mentions? As it turns out, it exists and was done by Richard Burkhauser. It has been cited in other places, like Cox News Service. The report is called "The Diminishing Target Efficiency of Minimum Wage Hikes: The Case of Single Mothers," and is listed as a "Working Paper" on Burkhauser's Curriculum Vitae. (NY's Gov. George Pataki listed it as a reason for opposing a minimum wage hike in his state.)

So, is the minimum wage really a bad thing?

Well, that's where you can play dueling experts. If you take Burkhauser to be credible (and I do) are there equally credible experts who take the opposite point of view?

Yes.

For example David Card and Alan Krueger have published on the topic and come to different conclusions from Burkhauser.

So what conclusions to draw. Right now, here's where I am:

There is economic research by some credible folks on both sides of the minimum wage debate. From my reading, it seems you're hard pressed to make a case that business suffers under such an increase, but you may also be equally hard pressed to prove that such an increase helps all those you're aiming at.

As for EPI, I continue to be leery of any group trying to appear non-partisan when they appear to have quite a large axe to grind.

New Rules (chairmen)

This is very exciting to people who follow the legislature closely; from Speaker Black's office:

RALEIGH -- N.C. House Speaker Jim Black (D-Mecklenburg) announced today that he has broadened the House leadership and has named Reps. Mickey Michaux (D-Durham), Nelson Cole (D-Rockingham) and Marian McLawhorn (D-Pitt) as the new tri-chairmen of the House Rules Committee. The three legislators have served in the House for a combined 47 years and they represent districts in the Triad, Triangle and Eastern North Carolina.

"We've got so many issues to deal with in the short session that I believe that we need to broaden the House leadership and divide the duties of the Rules Committee chairman among three very strong and experienced legislators," Speaker Black said. "Mickey Michaux, Nelson Cole and Marian McLawhorn will help us accomplish our goals and get things done in a more timely, efficient and productive way."

The 2006 short session of the N.C. General Assembly begins on Tuesday, May 9 at noon.

"Our state continues to face challenges when it comes to educating our children, creating new jobs and providing affordable health care to our people," Speaker Black said. "Starting on Tuesday, legislators will begin work on these and many other important issues, and I believe that we can make progress and continue to move our state forward if we all work together. I welcome cooperation from across the aisle and I hope that we can all keep the needs of the people of North Carolina in the forefront of our minds at all times. We were all elected to do the people's business in Raleigh and I think this new model of tri-chairs will help us accomplish that goal."

The previous chairman of the House Rules Committee, former Rep. Bill Culpepper (D-Chowan), was appointed by Gov. Mike Easley to the N.C. Utilities Commission in January.

What folks in the Triad need to know: Nelson Cole has just become one of the most powerful legislators in the state House. The Rules Committee is a funny animal, but among other things is can basically revive or kill any piece of legislation winding its way through the House. Short of the Speaker, there's no more powerful position in the chamber...although it's interesting that the job has been split up into three parts.

Bullying the gas tax

Gov. Mike Easley has taken to the bully pulpit and used it simultaneously pick on Republicans in Washington and try and re-claim an issue state legislative Republicans had hoped to ride this legislative session.

That's right folks, he's calling for freezing the gas tax. While the legislature doesn't always give Easley what he wants, the governor has certainly raised the issue's profile a bit.

Update:Sen. Phil Berger just called me back and points out that he and other Republicans called for freezing or lowering the gas tax last fall and the Easley pushed back, saying the money was needed for highway construction projects.

“I think the governor is taking a step in the right direction,” Berger said. “I wish he had joined with us eight months ago when we were calling for it to be frozen.”

Berger said the state should not only freeze the tax, but reduce it by the 2.9-cents it rose on Jan. 1.

And, he said, the next step on the gas tax would be to stop transfers of money from the highway trust fund, which is stocked by the gas tax, to the general fund. Although authorized by the original law that created the trust funds, the transfers have gotten out of hand over the years Berger said.

“The $200 million he’s talking about transferring back (ed note: see release below) I would view as a down payment on repaying the hundreds of millions of dollars that have been transferred from the fund at the governor’s request.”

Now, here's the release that started all this conversation from the governor’s office:

RALEIGH – Gov. Mike Easley today announced that he will call on the General Assembly to freeze the state gasoline tax so that the rate will not increase from the current level. In addition, he repeated his call to President Bush and Congress to act to ease the financial burden of soaring fuel prices on consumers. This freeze will be in addition to broad-based tax relief and $10 million in heating and cooling assistance for the needy to be included in the Governor’s budget, which will be released next week.

Continue reading "Bullying the gas tax" »

May 7, 2006

Weekend update: pre-short session edition

From the N+R this weekend:

And from other ink-stained wretches and pixil-stained bloggers around the state:

More fun to come this week as the honorables return to Raleigh.

May 8, 2006

Dropping hints

Gov. Mike Easley will roll out his budget request for next year tomorrow (Tuesday 5/9). He's been dropping hints for days as to what this thing will look like. For his latest click right here.

Suffice it to say, the governor has some ideas on how to spend that $2 billion (sort of) surplus everyone is chattering about around here.

Meanwhile, the honorables are officially back in town tomorrow as well, kicking off all the fun and excitement of the short session at noon-ish.

May 9, 2006

Tuesday Update: Hey na, Hey na, the legislature's back

Alright, yes, things are getting a bit dippy here at Capital Beat central. That's because without some serious advances in cloning during the next 35 minutes, I'm not going to be able to get everywhere I want to be today.

The return of the General Assembly and the release of the governor's budget will keep me hopping. Among the other items on the daybook today: Rep. Alma Adams will appear with State Treasurer Richard Moore to promote the proposed $1 increase in the minimum wage. For extra fun, the House leadership will be laying out their plans for the upcoming session and at least one group is planning a big rally in support of cutting the gas tax.

From today's paper:

As always, the comment lines are open.

Just...wow

You'd be pretty naive to think that this sort of thing doesn't go on in governments at all levels. But people who do such things usually have enough sense to keep it to themselves. (Via Wonkette)

May 10, 2006

Video Poker Ban

The Senate put a ban on video poker on the fast track today. It will be heard on the floor of the Senate Thursday and will come over to the House next week.

For those who need background on the video poker issue, click right here.

The Senate has passed similar bills in the past with gusto but it has always stalled in the House.

One reason for the House’s reticence has been Speaker Jim Black’s strong support of the video poker industry. But speculation is the Speaker won’t be able to step in this year because of all his problems over the past nine months or so.

Also, the way the Senate has sent the bill over would allow the House to simply voting it up or down, rather than having to stick it into a committee.

Stay tuned.

Dateline Raleigh Update

Nothing fancy, just links to my stories from the past few days:

And for good measure, here's one from our friends at the Associated Press that I get asked about a lot: That lawsuit to try and stop the Dell incentives was thrown out.

May 11, 2006

Senate passes video poker ban

The Senate passed a ban on video poker today, making the machines illegal anywhere except at a casino on tribal lands. The issue heads to the House next week.

Background here if you need it.

And this here is a link to the bill status, language and sponsors. The page may still say "Extend Sunset/Animal Disease Prevention" but don't be fooled, it's the poker bill. (The Senate took an old bill that the House had passed, gutted it, and plopped in the poker language.)

May 12, 2006

Head scratcher

From the readers may know more than I do department, does anyone out there have any ideas about this:

RALEIGH -- An unexpected increase in the number of children taking an alternative end-of-grade test for special-needs students forced state officials to push back testing dates, created administrative hassles in larger school districts like Guilford County and has educators baffled as to what exactly happened.

The state expected to print 10,000 copies of the Extend2 test, given to third- through eighth-grade students with certain learning and physical disabilities in place of the standard end-of-grade test. Local testing officials say it would be used for nearly all students with disabilities except those with severe impairments.

But when final orders were tallied from across the state, North Carolina needed about 78,000 copies of the test, said Mildred Bazemore, the chief of North Carolina's test development section.

Click here for the whole story, or at least the story as far as I could write it.

What I still lack is a good explanation as to why the DPI was over-whelmed with test requests. Drop your suggestions for where to go looking for the answer at the comments link below.

Uncle Art?

A few weeks back, during a news conference, Jim Black referred to former Rep. Art Pope as "Uncle Art." Pope is has a lot of money and has spent a lot of it building a conservative infrastructure in North Carolina, helping to unseat a key ally of Black and generally creating problems for the state's Democrats. Step out of line, Black warned, and “Uncle Art is going to get you.”

As soon as Black said it, I thought to myself that it was a moniker custom made for editorialists and political cartoonists. It was, I thought, a bid to make Art Pope the conservative boogieman that, well, Republicans are trying to make Black.

Well, Carter Wrenn over at Talking About Politics has a theory right up that alley:

The Democrats are going to make Pope the most unpopular man in North Carolina – on the theory that when they do voters are going to forget all about Jim Black.

Look for State House hearings to investigate Pope and the ‘millions’ he’s spending on politics. Look for Pope, his friends, the heads of the different conservative organizations he funds (the Locke Foundation and Republican Legislature Majority Committee) and a bevy of political consultants to be called to testify. Look for a lot of digging into Pope’s company, Variety Wholesalers, Inc.

It's a short piece so go read the whole thing.

May 14, 2006

It’s time to hang up and drive, for some of us

Good Sunday morning. From today's paper, I have a story about a bill under consideration in the N.C. General Assembly that would prohibit drivers under 18 from using a mobile phone while driving.

Click here to read that story.

For those looking for more information, some linkage:

A few points of for discussion before I turn y'all loose:

  • I sought out a few interviews for this story with young folks learning to drive. I landed a couple and they didn't add a whole lot. The consensus among the teens I talked to was, "I don't know, I guess." Upon further reflection, I sort of wish I had kept those quotes in there, just to have representation from the people this law would most affect.
  • Full disclosure: I am as guilty as anyone of talking on my mobile phone(s) while driving. I usually use a headset, but Foss tells me that's really not getting at the safety issue of one’s brain not paying attention to the task at hand.
  • If you're going to do this for teens, why not do it for all drivers? From my experience writing a story on this topic about a year ago, that's a question that's going to be on a lot of people's minds. The only answer I can offer up, and it's meant only partially in jest, is that the folks who would have to pass this law spend a lot of time on the road and on the phone at the same time.

Alright, the comments link is open...have at it.

May 15, 2006

For perspective

In the coming weeks there will be a good deal of debate in Raleigh about whether to cut the sales tax and whether to raise the minimum wage. Here are a few numbers to keep in mind as all this is tossed about.

  • Sales tax throughout most of the state is 7 percent right now. Under the governor’s proposed cut that would go down to 6.75 percent. Under the cut suggested by a large number of Republicans, it would go down to 6.5 percent.

    Or, on a $100 purchase, the governor’s proposal will save you 25-cents while the GOP version will save you 50-cents.

  • Minimum wage right now is $5.15 an hour. Current proposals before the legislature would put that at $6.15 an hour.

    Or, for an eight hour work day, minimum wage would go from $41.20 (before taxes and withholding and what not) to $49.20 (before taxes and withholding and what not).

    By comparison, a legislators per diem (the amount they get just to off-set the expense of their legislative service for one 24-hour period) is $104, plus mileage – or twice as much as the augmented minimum wage, plus mileage.

Now all these proposals have some merit to them, and they have some marks against them. But either way the state ends up going, one could be excused for having the sneaking suspicion that we’re not really getting at whatever problem it is we’re trying to solve.

May 17, 2006

Border dispute

From today's paper:

High Point and Winston-Salem would be barred from annexing parts of Davidson County under a bill three state House members filed Tuesday.

For High Point in particular, the proposed law -- if enacted -- could drastically change the city's plans for future growth.

The measure's sponsors say it is meant to return control of local land management to county residents.

High Point city officials said they are bewildered by the move and unsure if the law could be enforced.

Click here to read the whole thing.

Read the bill itself and see its status and sponsors by clicking here.

The idea may be unpopular with the High Point politicians, but I’m already getting e-mail saying some Davidson County folks think it’s a good idea:

A big thank you to those who drafted this bill! I live near the Hasty Fire Dept. and have been so worried about High Point trying to reach over here. The Paul Pope Rd. development will greatly affect this area. I have been against it but have not had the time to invest in a fight. Thank God there are those who do. They are not a vocal minority. None of us wants more traffic. We want to keep our rural, country roots. –B.B.

The comments link is open for your own thoughts.

May 18, 2006

Back up…maybe

My apologies to anyone who tried to find their way here in the past day and couldn't log in. Apparently the hamster that runs the paper's blog servers passed away from exhaustion or old age or something yesterday. We've now apparently upgraded to GerbilDrive 2000 and things appear to be working...sort of…as much as they ever do.

From today's paper:

There was lots of other doings yesterday, particularly along the ethics front. It's still way early in the process, though, so I'm not going to get too excited about all these ethics bills until I see what the Senate does. The House passed a legislative ethics bill yesterday after hours of debate that got kind of silly at some points.

Today (Thursday) should be a relatively light one for the honorables, then they’ll head back home to their districts until Monday night.

Orange is his color?

From our friends at the Associated Press:

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A federal grand jury indicted former lottery commissioner Kevin Geddings on fraud charges Thursday, saying he tried to deceive the state of North Carolina by failing to disclose that he had worked for a leading supplier of scratch-off lottery tickets.

The U.S. Attorney's in Raleigh said Geddings, a former chief of staff to South Carolina Gov. Jim Hodges, faces five counts of mail fraud and four counts of wire fraud.

Prosecutors said Scientific Games Corp. paid Geddings nearly $230,000 from 2001 to 2005, but that Geddings never disclosed his financial ties to the company as required when he filled out a state financial disclosure form.

Geddings resigned from the newly formed commission Nov. 1, just before his relationship to the company was revealed.

The 42-page indictment alleges that Geddings concealed his work for the company because he knew it would disqualify him for a seat on the lottery commission.


For more on Geddings click here.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but I don't think many folks around Raleigh are going to be shocked or saddened if this guy eventually has to head off to the pokey. In addition to helping spark House Speaker Jim Black's troubles, the guy seems to have flat out lied to a lot of folks - including me - and according to the indictment his financial disclosure form was a work of fiction.

Speaking of Black, here’s a statement from his office regarding the indictment:

"Speaker Black, just like everyone else, was surprised to learn about the depth of Kevin Geddings' on-going business relationship with Scientific Games," said Julie Robinson, spokesperson for House Speaker Jim Black (D-Mecklenburg). "Had the Speaker known the details and exact timing of his relationship with the lottery company, he would never have appointed him to the new lottery commission."

As always, the comment lines are open.

May 19, 2006

Lab project

From today's paper:

A $101 million state public health laboratory proposed in Gov. Mike Easley’s budget should be built in or near Greensboro, leaders from Guilford County say.

As proposed by Easley, the 203,834-square-foot facility would combine the state’s public health and bioterrorism laboratories, both located in downtown Raleigh, and the office of the chief medical examiner, located in Chapel Hill.


Read the whole thing.

And from High Point staff writer Kory Dodd:

HIGH POINT -- The City Council voted Thursday to endorse a state bill aimed at changing the city's municipal elections to boost voter turnout.

The bill would switch city council elections from odd-numbered to even-numbered years, allowing them to periodically coincide with presidential elections.

Read the whole thing.

May 21, 2006

Raleigh Dispatch: The ethics debate

Don’t panic.

Really.

I know you heard about that debate on the House floor last week. You know, the one about the ethics bill.

Yes, that quote from Mecklenburg County Democrat Drew Saunders is pretty much all you need to know about it.

"Even baby Jesus accepted gifts and I don't believe it corrupted him," Saunders told the chamber. I’m not sure what kind of reaction that line got on the floor - I couldn't hear over the guffaws from my fellow scribes listening in the pressroom.

The honorables didn’t manage to slander any other major religious figures during the remainder of the debate, but you sort of got the feeling these boys and girls were missing the point.

But don’t panic.

Really. This could all turn out okay...sort of...maybe...I think.

Continue reading "Raleigh Dispatch: The ethics debate" »

May 22, 2006

Budget

Word has it that the Senate will file its budget bill tonight after they wrap up the 7 p.m. session and that all the gory details will start making the rounds Tuesday morning. This probably means you’ll see a few stories tomorrow talking about pieces of the budget in advance of the full release.

The only thing that I’ve heard definitively enough to be believed (said with confidence by more than one source) is that there will definitely be a minimum wage increase included in the bill. And yeah, you should expect to see a couple of tax cuts. But I’m not going to bet on numbers until I see the thing in black and white.

And in case you hadn't heard...

From our friends at AP:

RALEIGH (AP) — A former political director for House Speaker Jim Black is one of three former lottery company workers who have been charged with violating state lobbying laws, according to court documents released Monday.

Meredith Norris worked on staff in Black's office from 1999-2002, but quit to work as a lobbyist while staying with his campaign as a volunteer until late last summer. After a seven-month investigation, Wake County prosecutors have also charged former lottery commissioner Kevin Geddings, along with former Scientific Games International vice president Edward Alan Middleton, for failing to register as lobbyists last year with the Secretary of State's office.

Click here for the full story.

Senate Budget

Okay all you budget wonks, Senate Democrats filed their version of the budget Monday night.

Only, what, like two or three more versions until the version that really counts is in the offing? Yeah, don’t expect me to get too excited about the budget until this thing heads to the House-Senate conference, and that's a few weeks away.

Anyway, the Senators seem to be doing a lot of the expected, including:

  • Raising the minimum wage to $6.15 an hour.
  • Cutting the top income tax rate for families and small businesses in the state to 8 percent.
  • Cutting sales tax to 6.75 percent in most places.
  • Raising teacher salaries. My friends at AP say that it’s an 8 percent raise for public school teachers, 6 percent for community college folks and 5 percent for other state employees. I'll take their word for it at this hour.
  • Also on the teacher front, the Senate budget would set aside $515,115 for "a pilot program providing for a salary supplement for newly hired teachers (as defined by the State Board of Education) of mathematics or science at the middle or high school level."
  • Creating more judgeships and DA positions, including three new District Attorneys for Guilford County (that would bring the county to 30) as well as a new district court judge.

I'm sure there's a lot more in there, but that's what tomorrow is for. Although I will leave you with the thing that made me go "so, what's this now?"

The Senate budget would make The North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics, a high school, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina system. The school was already affiliated with UNC as I understand it, but this certainly would amp up that bond.

Questions, comments and insights welcome via the comment link.

May 23, 2006

Where’s the beef Pork?

I wrote a story for today’s paper about the various local earmark projects that various legislators are seeking. Some might call those pork, but of course one man’s swine is another man’s “vital economic interest.”

Well, the Senate is busy going over its budget today and it is relatively pork-free, although not quite Kosher. Says Senate Leader Marc Basnight, a Dare County Democrat, “We didn’t have the money.”

Now don’t get me wrong, there are still some specially designated items. For example, there is $1.75 million set aside for marketing the furniture market in High Point.

But by comparison to other years’ budget, there are much fewer of those little projects. I’m still pondering what that means, but it could portend a rough set of negotiations with the House.

GOP Options in 2008

Our friends at the Associated Press report that U.S. Rep. Sue Myrick is not running for governor in 2008. From the AP:

The announcement by Myrick, who had the highest name recognition of any potential GOP candidate, creates a wide-open race for the party's nomination. The governor's office will be open in 2008, with incumbent Democrat Mike Easley barred by the state constitution from seeking a third term.

Myrick, 64, who faces Democrat Bill Glass in her bid this year for a seventh term in Congress, said she issued the statement to quell rumors of a gubernatorial run.

"My focus is on my current job and I want to end the speculation to the contrary," said Myrick, a former Charlotte mayor.

Unlike the Democrats who have three presumptive front runners – Lt. Gov. Beverly Perdue, AG Roy Cooper and State Treasurer Richard Moore – the gubernatorial picture is hazier for the GOP. Myrick was the Republicans’ best known potential candidate.

Myrick’s departure from the race may catapult Bill Graham to the front of the pack. Graham’s a name known among pundits and reporters as the driving force behind the public stop the gas tax campaign. The couple times I’ve heard him speak, he’s been coy about his gubernatorial ambitions. And with action pending to cap the gas tax this year, the issue may not have currency into 2007 and 2008.

Sen. Fred Smith has been mentioned as a potential candidate, but like Graham may lack a bit in the name recognition department, at least statewide.

Patrick Ballantine, who ran against Easley in 2004, doesn’t have his name mentioned by pundits as much as one might think. That may be due to getting beat pretty handily in a year when a presidential candidate from his own party (Bush) lead the ticket and won the state.

So who else is out there?

Now let’s see here...North Carolina governors over the past couple decade have tended to lean to the political center - or at least pragmatic - over the past couple of decades, whether they be Democrats or Republicans. They need to have and be able to raise a fair amount of campaign cash. Their names, for better or worse, need to be fairly well known. And some experience in the legislature graduate school of hard knocks doesn’t hurt either.

Anyone know a GOP pol who fits that bill who will have time on their hands in a few months?

I do, but the guy I’m thinking of would drive the more conservative, Art Pope-lead wing of his party nuts.

Richard Morgan.

You heard me.

Yes, I know he’s been in a running fight with fellow members of the GOP over his power-sharing arrangement with House Democrats. And yes, he just lost a costly primary campaign. And yes, I know that you usually need to win the activist wing of the party to win a statewide primary.

But still, the possibility was intriguing enough for me to give Morgan a call.

“There have been others that discussed that possibility with me, but my foremost concern has been the institution of the House,” Morgan said. “I don’t know what the future holds.”

Morgan continued that after his primary loss this month, he hasn’t had time to consider his political future.

“I haven’t been in the frame of mind to think about that.”

I take him at his word. Frankly, he sounded kind of tired on the phone. But I’m betting that come October or November, those “others” who have broached the topic with him are going to broach it again.

May 24, 2006

Budget vote

The senate budget passed today with six Republicans voting for the bill.

Among the GOP members voting for was Sen. Stan Bingham, who represents Davidson County and High Point.

Republicans voting for a budget crafted by Democratic leaders has become a fairly rare occurrence in recent years as both chambers have taken on more partisan overtones since the 1990s.

So why did Bingham hop on board?

“There are a lot of good things in there for the piedmont and just a lot of good things in the budget,” Bingham said. “This time there was no pork and that made me really happy.”

All in all, it was interesting to see the partisan edge to soften around the chamber.

Sen. Phil Berger, a Rockingham Republican who represents parts of Guilford County, was among the 15 Republicans who voted against the budget. So did Republican Sens. Jerry Tillman of Randolph County and Hugh Webster of Alamance.

Greensboro Democratic Sens. Kay Hagan and Katie Dorsett voted for the budget.

The Senate will vote a second time on the budget Thursday. It will then be sent to the House, where the odds are that the members there will vote the thing down and produce their own spending plan that will probably be somewhat at odds with what the Senate sent over.

Then the thing will be reconciled in conference committee. More on budgets and conference committees coming in Monday’s “Raleigh Dispatch” feature.

May 25, 2006

Q+A: Medicaid

A question from Jeff in this post asks:

Are they doing anything about the Medicaid burden on counties? Our officials in Rockingham County begged them to return some surplus to help pay for Medicaid at the county level.

What do you know about the bills circulating regarding Medicaid costs to the counties?

Here’s the answer in short: The Senate budget does not include the Medicaid relief for counties. The governor’s budget really didn’t do a whole lot in that regard either. What the House will do is an open question at this point.

For the long answer, click to the jump.

Continue reading "Q+A: Medicaid" »

Video poker

As those the boys from Charlotte first reported earlier this week, House Speaker Jim Black has a plan to phase out video poker in North Carolina. From my story on the subject:

House Speaker Jim Black said Wednesday that his proposal would give people associated with the video-poker industry time to find other jobs and sell their equipment.

When asked if a ban had become inevitable, Black was less than certain.

"I don't know," said Black, a Mecklenburg County Democrat. "There are all kind of ideas as to what to do."

Click here for the whole thing.

If you have the feeling that a video poker ban isn't quite a done deal, no you're not crazy. Right now, the Senate is as united as the chamber gets on anything in their resolve to phase out video poker. But the House is all over the map, from folks like Rep. John Blust who backs a ban to Rep. Earl Jones who thinks the industry is being treated unfairly.

Senators I interviewed for my story saw no need for a phase-out scheme to give workers time to find other jobs. Sen. Kay Hagan was representative of the lot when she said, "I think they've been on notice for at least a year now." It's unclear whether Senators would back the phase out plan if it were sent over by the House, although one might think they'd seize on any chance to finally get a ban of some sort, having voted on the thing five times in recent years.

Want more on video poker? Click here for audio of a few of us scrubby press types asking Black about the issue.

When Black talks about the bill not being "clean," he's saying that the video poker ban passed by the Senate would have an unintended consequence of freeing the Cherokee Casino to have live dealers and other forms of gambling that they do not now. Senators dispute that notion.

Minimum wage passes … twice

The House and the Senate both voted to raise the state’s minimum wage to $6.15 an hour today, but both in different ways.

This morning, Senators gave final approval to their version of the budget, which has a minimum wage increase tacked onto it.

This afternoon, House voted in favor of a stand-alone bill, which must go through a formal “third reading” in the chamber next week before final passage.

Local Democratic Reps. Alma Adams, Nelson Cole, Pricey Harrison, Maggie Jeffus, Hugh Holliman, and Earl Jones voted in favor. Republic Rep. John Blust voted against. Republican Laura Wiley was absent today – home sick I’m told.

What now? The possibilities are not endless but there are bunches. The minimum wage increase could pass as part of a budget deal, although House leaders have said that they want to keep non-budget items out of the budget this year. The Senate could take a swing at this stand alone bill.

Or, and don’t discount this possibility, the two houses could get all grumpy with one another, grind to a standstill and the minimum wage bill could be a casualty of inter-chamber cultural differences despite support for the measure on both sides of the building.

Update: Sen. Kay Hagan said she thinks the minimum wage bill will have no problem passing in the Senate. Although there have been some rumblings that it couldn't get through without being attached to some small business relief package, Hagan says she's pretty sure there's not enough opposition to kill the bill.

"I think we'll be able to do that in a heartbeat," she said.

Minimum Wage: Bells and Whistles

Odds and ends, including audio, regarding the minimum wage bill:

Now for the audio, from Thursday’s floor debate in the House:

  • Alma’s initial speech on the bill: Click here.
  • Rep. Joe Kiser, the Republican leader in the House, voices his opposition. Click here. “I’m not sure you’re doing a favor to these people in a lot of cases.”
  • Rep. Bonner Stiller, a Brunswick County Republican, and Rep. Earl Jones, a Greensboro Democrat, go at it a bit. Click here.
  • Debate over a proposed amendment that would have made the higher minimum wage apply only to people 21-years-old and older. There was quite a bit of push back and forth. Click here. “This amendment adds insult to injury for our young people trying to go and seek a higher education,” said Rep. Deborah Ross, a Wake County Democrat. Jones weighs in here as well, towards the end.
  • The tail end of the debate. Don’t be afraid of the very pregnant pause at the beginning there, there was in fact dead silence for a few seconds. Click here.

May 28, 2006

Yikes

Oh dear goodness, some folks have mistaken me for some sort of pundit.

Original post here.

May 29, 2006

Raleigh Dispatch: Opening up

RALEIGH – For those outside of Raleigh, it wasn’t much of a pronouncement. Sure, it could make sneaking last minute items into the state’s $18.8 billion budget harder by changing one of the longest held traditions in the legislature, but will it really mean anything?

“I’ll mention one of those changes that will occur whenever we negotiate with the House to work the difference the changes on our budget versus their budget, it will be open and will notify you as quickly as we know ourselves,” said Democratic Sen. Marc Basnight, the president pro tempore and the head honcho in his chamber. He was speaking to a group of reporters the day after the Senate rolled out its budget. “Any kind of discussion and the meeting of what’s occurring in that budget negotiation will be public.”

All that might seem like meaningless gobbly-gook. But here’s why it just may mean something to everyone.

For as long as anyone I’ve talked to can remember, the conference committees between the House and Senate that negotiate the final budget legislators send to the governor has been closed door affairs.

And they are, we scrubby media types have been lead to believe, one of the prime venues for strange little bits of pork (you like your teapot museum with one lump or two) and un-debated changes to state law.

Oh, and they are specifically exempted from the state’s open meetings laws.

Allowing the public to scrutinize the process would presumably discourage some of that last minute largess, or at least give folks a chance to weigh in before the final draft comes along.

It would also allow folks to see part of the real game. Sure, the governor puts out his plan; the honorables nod, and set off writing their own. We in the press slavishly follow the House and Senate budgets that are put out. But it’s really the compromise between those two positions where real governance happens. Here-to-fore, only those cutting the deals really knew how they were cut.

So will the House go for it? It seems so.

“I have nothing to hide, so it’s okay with me,” said House Speaker Jim Black. Like Basnight, Black lays down the law for budget negotiations on his side of the building.

Opening the conference committees up seem to be one more thing the honorables are willing to do in an attempt to restore public confidence in the General Assembly after nearly a year of stories about ethical lapses and lapses in judgment at the highest levels.

So this could really be something?

Yes, say advocates for government reform.

“The more eyes on a process the better, always,” said Bob Phillips, executive director of North Carolina Common Cause. Phillips has the unenviable job of convincing people with power, influence and all the rest of it to give up bits of their power, influence and what not.

“The way the current system is set up, it’s difficult to know – much less have any ability to shape – what’s coming out until the deal has been cut,” Phillips said. So a change in that system could be a good thing.

Could be.

“It will be interesting to see even with open conference committee meetings, whether that is true openness,” Phillips said.

Dang. It’s reality check time.

Basnight himself offered a few caveats on all this openness.

“Now there will be no open door when the Speaker (Black) and myself sit down,” Basnight said. As he describes it, those meetings are “only a small part of the process” and really geared toward “shutting down the session” rather than dealing in specifics.

And Basnight said there may be informal meetings among some of the chairman of various appropriation subcommittees and their counterparts that won’t be announced.

O-kay. Those aren’t big loopholes or anything. Curiously enough, they’re not ones Phillips begrudges.

“I even understand how there need to be some conversations on process that are closed,” Phillips said, quickly adding, “On those final decisions, you want to have that out there in the open.”

And it sounds like that’s what Basnight plans, and Black is willing to go along with.

“The actual negotiations between the differences, these chairs will open it up,” Basnight said.

There are problems, sure. Whether any of us scrubby press types will actually be able to scramble to all the last minute conference sessions is a big question. And I don’t think anyone really believes that all the behind closed door wheeling and dealing will go away – call me a cynic, everyone else does.

Still, the effort to make things more transparent seems to be there, in some part.

Whether that leads to a budget with fewer teapots and more respect from the public remains to be seen.

May 30, 2006

Tuesday at the General Assembly

On the Senate side, if you were waiting for the results of the eye exam bill vote, you have longer to wait. The Senate delayed the vote...again.

On the House side, the minimum wage debate has just begun as of 2:44 p.m.

Update (3:30 p.m.): The minimum wage bill passed the House a second time (it passed last week too) 72-43. It goes to the Senate now.

May 31, 2006

Video Poker

The House is supposed to take up its version of the video poker ban today. Session was supposed to begin at 2 p.m., but as of 2:20 p.m. there's been no gavel. (And no, that's not unusual.)

Rep. Hugh Holliman, who represents Davidson County and is the Democratic whip, said many members will be just as happy to not be asked about video poker every other day.

"What's so problematic about video poker," Holliman said before session, "is we continue to have major incidents of people not going by the law."

Prior posts here.

Update: The bill passes long about 3 p.m. The vote was 114-1. That 1? Rep. John Blust, a Greensboro Republican. I have no idea if that was a mistake or no, he didn't say anything on the floor. I'll ask him after session.

Update2: Blust says his vote was no mistake. He wanted a bill that would have eliminated poker faster, so he voted against this one, which has a year-long phase out provision.

Update3: More odds and ends on video poker: