Let's talk about sex
From today's paper:
RALEIGH - Sex education as taught in most of North Carolina's public schools isn't working, says Rep. Alma Adams.The Greensboro Democrat is one of the primary sponsors of a measure that would give parents the choice between two sex-education curriculums for their middle school students:
- *One would be the current standard course, emphasizing abstinence until marriage, that the legislature prescribed in 1995.
- *A more comprehensive approach relaying more information about disease and pregnancy prevention.
"There's just so much evidence that our kids do need to be informed," Adams said last week. "It's an issue I don't think we've addressed adequately."
Click here for the full story.
Click here to read the bill and click here for contact info on Adams.
Mentioned in the story:
- * The North Carolina Family Policy Council, which has opposed prior versions of this bill.
- * The Guilford County Coalition on Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention.
- * The The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. In their rankings of teen pregnancy rates, North Carolina is 42 - or put another way, we have the 8th-highest rate of teen pregnancy in the nation per 1,000 girls age 15-19.
For stats and other stuff mentioned in the story:
- * Teen pregnancy stats for girls 15-17 by North Carolina County.
- * Guilford County-focused teen pregnancy stats, including by girls ages 10-14 - there were 28 in 2007.
- * Teen pregnancy stats by county over 1978 to 2006.
- * More stats from the state.
Comments (8)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
Ms. Adams underlying assumption is that kids don't know where babies come from. She obviously has not spent much time around kids, as that is one thing television and our sex-saturated culture teach them. The language (both spoken and body) used by our adolescents demonstrate that the one thing they do know are the ins and outs of sex. (Just go to a high school dance.)
Abstinence education, i.e., no sex outside of marriage, works every time it is tried. It was an important part of dramatically reducing the spread of AIDs in Uganda. The problem is that we are not reinforcing the message of abstinence in our culture. Out-of-wedlock pregnancies do not carry the stigma they once did, even though the advent of the single parent family has caused tremendous damage to society in the form of poverty, incarceration, etc. We need to stop sending our kids mixed messages, and begin treating sex and its consequences as serious business rather than something to be joked about.
Posted on February 15, 2009 10:38 AM
Abstinence only programs are very dangerous and unrealistic. Numerous, sound studies prove that is true. I would never want me kids to be denied the opportunity to learn about the real dangers of sex that they will have. The News & Record ran a great article recently that highlighted a study that found that not only were kids who pledged to remain abstinent having sex, they had higher rates of STDs and started having sex earlier than other teens.
Posted on February 15, 2009 12:52 PM
Abstinence only programs are very dangerous and unrealistic. Numerous, sound studies prove that is true. I would never want me kids to be denied the opportunity to learn about the real dangers of sex that they will have. The News & Record ran a great article recently that highlighted a study that found that not only were kids who pledged to remain abstinent having sex, they had higher rates of STDs and started having sex earlier than other teens.
Posted on February 15, 2009 12:53 PM
Just make the male students look at photos of Alma (in one of her bizarre hats) for an hour or so. That should settle their little hormones down.
Posted on February 15, 2009 9:01 PM
Uganda's program is ABC: "Abstinence, Be Faithful, and use Condoms". It is not abstinence only.
Posted on February 16, 2009 10:18 AM
Thank you, Greg, for correcting the faith-based rhetoric about the ABC program. My wife is an internationally known researcher on this issue. Bottom line? Ab-only doesn't work as well as comprehensive sex education.
The commenter above would have us believe that Ab-only would work except for the little old problem of the many billions of dollars invested by Big Business and Big Media in selling sex to our children. If only our culture didn't exist, then Ab-only would work just great.
Riiiiiiiight. If only George Bush hadn't been president for eight years, we wouldn't be in a global depression from flushing a trillion dollars down the hidey-hole in Iraq.
If only bullfrogs had wings ...
Posted on February 16, 2009 3:23 PM
On another subject, forgetting the argument between which side is better for a second, perhaps we could try sending the message more than once? Most kids are being taught sex education during one educational year (normally in the early middle school years, around 6th or 7th grade) and never receiving any such instruction again. We should try reinforcing the ideas we are sending. Instead of abandoning our children during their greatest time of sexual temptation and assuming they'll be all right with some vague memory of a class long ago, we need to repeat the ideas and continue to give them that structure.
Posted on February 17, 2009 7:24 PM
Abstinence only programs are very dangerous and unrealistic.*Michael S. said:
Have you any fact that reports thousands or millions of human beings have died from Abstinence or become mentaly ill?
Chances are that thousands or millions have died or become mentaly ill without Abstinence!
Social planning by the State always leads to one becoming a slave of the State or simply a program Robot issuing myths and wonders of a supreme dictatorship that always destroys humans with Police State methods
Posted on February 22, 2009 4:43 PM