North Carolina is a leader when it comes to teachers getting National Board Certification. North Carolina has about 9,800 of the more than 47,000 National Board Certified teachers in the nation. Guilford accounts for about 400 of those.
The lengthy process also is costly (I believe around $2,300), a tab that the state picks up, along with offering financial incentives (12 percent raise) for teachers who receive the certification.
Research has so far indicated that board certified teachers are the cream of the crop. Not so the latest study, which used N.C. data from Charlotte-Mecklenburg and Wake County school systems, according to this Edweek article. Here's a link to Eduwonk, an education blog that questioned why the board hadn't released the study.
What the study looked at was whether students achieve more under board certified teachers.
Edweek writes this observation from the researcher: To choose the board-certified teacher over the teacher without the credential would be "only trivially better than a coin flip."
So has North Carolina's (and Guilford's) investment been wasted? Any educators out there willing to weigh in on this?
BTW: The researcher is none other than William Sanders, who brought you the value-added data system that Guilford is relying heavily on to determine whether students are gaining one or more years of academic growth.