State looks at making math tests harder
State education officials are considering making it harder to pass math tests.
Critics have said the state sets the bar too low. So low in fact, that "You could almost fall over it," Sam Miller, a UNCG education professor and chairman of the university's department of curriculum and instruction told the N&R in 2004. At that time, students could pass by answering just one-third of the questions.
This year's math scores have been delayed while officials go over results from a new test and decide what the passing rate should be.
At least one education watchdog group thinks the curriculum should be revamped and notes that other countries have students study algebra and geometry at younger ages.
Some have argued here that pushing Algebra earlier was a mistake; most Guilford students take it in eighth-grade now.
What do you think? Should the state look at making passing the tests harder than it is now? What about revamping the curriculum to move higher-level math concepts into earlier grades?
ADD: More math talk from another education blog, the School Zone. Scroll down to the first Sept. 13 post on the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's blog. The story looks at a report that leans back toward children learning basic math facts instead of how to "think like a mathematician."
Comments (4)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
But what would that do to our EOC, ABC, and AYP reports?????
Isn't it possible that more students would fail???
Wouldn't that be awful??????
(Note the above was posted in a sarcastic vein. Since when does the State or GCS CARE if students learn or not??? Isn't it really all about the test scores??)
Posted on September 15, 2006 12:47 PM
I'm not sure how much harder the test should be but the standard needs to be raised for the levels. For years I have said that we celebrate level 3's and that is only about 1/3 of the correct answers. In no real world situation would that be reason for celebration. Level 3 should reflect some sort of mastery of the material. At this point it means little.
Posted on September 15, 2006 1:45 PM
Oh dear, "...revamping the math curriculum", that would mean another renovation at the Tomlinson building, right?
Posted on September 15, 2006 1:51 PM
"Some have argued here that pushing Algebra earlier was a mistake"
Who in their right mind seriously believes this? Of course, if you haven't developed at least a satisfactory handle of multiplication and division, algebrqa might be too challenging.
Posted on September 15, 2006 3:06 PM