Houston, we have a problem
You may have noticed that today's paper was a little bit smaller than usual. We had some computer problems Tuesday night that forced us to limited production. I don't know if anything had to be cut from the story I wrote about the school board meeting.
I blogged some of the outcome of the meeting live, which is in the previous post.
UPDATE: What I didn't get into the story is that the board never got around to discussing the graduation rates. There had been questions about why Dudley's rate plunged 39 percentage points from 2005 to 2006. In that same time, Grimsley's rose by 29 percentage points. Did redistricting play a role? They never got to discuss it with the district's statistician, but here's what he was going to present to the board.
The graduation rate, along with an update on construction, were among items put off until the next meeting because Tuesday's meeting was running long.
Here's the story I wrote for today's paper:
Eastern parents to fight for Lucent site
By Jennifer Fernandez
Staff Writer
Eastern Guilford parents plan to continue the fight to get their students together again at a renovated Carolina Corporate Center, the former Lucent building in McLeansville.
About a dozen parents withstood Tuesday's chilly night air to discuss their displeasure with plans for a so-called "pod village" next year instead of using the Carolina building. They plan to take up their cause with county commissioners, who must release any money Guilford County Schools needs to build the "pod village."
The Guilford County Board of Education had voted just moments earlier to put all of Eastern's students in a series of modular units until a permanent building can be built. Until Tuesday, the school board had been undecided whether freshmen would attend classes in the "pod village."
Students have been studying at separate sites, a university research facility in Browns Summit and GTCC's East Wendover campus, since shortly after a fire Nov. 1 destroyed Eastern.
District officials say it will cost about $4.25 million to set up and lease the modular units, which are sturdier than the mobile trailers that schools often use to create additional space. Last month, the district estimated the cost at $3.1 million.
Shortly after the fire, parents latched onto the idea of renovating the Carolina Center, potentially getting students back together as soon as next semester.
The building's owners originally said the site could be renovated at $10 to $12 per square foot. That amounts to about $1 million to $1.2 million for 100,000 square feet. Adding in leasing costs for two years put the final tally at $2.7 million to $2.9 million.
Those renovation estimates have since increased to about $30 per square foot, or $3 million. Adding leasing costs makes the total $4.7 million.
Costs would be higher if more space was needed.
And district officials remain skeptical of estimates from the building's owners, Florida Realty Investments. Kevin Lear, Guilford's chief operations officer, said he thinks the cost could be closer to $5.9 million for 100,000 square feet.
In both cases, officials are giving estimates based on what they know at the time they set those amounts.
"What we'd like to see is a fair assessment," between the two options, parent and Lucent Technologies salesman Clyde Gann, told the board at the beginning of its meeting.
"If you're going to make a decision on something like that, go out to bid. Get a fixed price," he said standing with other parents outside the board's offices after the vote.
The Carolina Center has not gotten a serious, thorough consideration by the district, said Michael McCloskey, chairman of Florida Realty Investments, which owns the center.
The company would be willing to guarantee a price for the school district, he said.
School board members Darlene Garrett and Deena Hayes were leery of the district's estimates on the project.
"We have in the past been given numbers and they escalate," Garrett said, referring to renovation work at three middle schools and the Academy at Smith, both of which increased by millions from initial estimates.
"All I can tell you is that's what we think the cost is going to be," Lear said. "But nobody can guarantee the cost at this point. Until you bid it out, you don't know what it's going to cost."
He asked the board to put the funding request for the modular units on the Jan. 18 county commissioners' agenda, even though the board won't see detailed plans until its Jan. 9 meeting. Commissioners require that agenda items be in place 14 days before a meeting, he said. The request can be taken off if the school board decides not to approve the plan, he added.
Unlike Eastern parents, Academy at Lincoln parents left the meeting with their request fulfilled.
The Very Strong Needs program, which serves the district's most academically advanced students, will remain at Lincoln.
Eligible students in fourth- through eighth-grade can receive the special services, which are offered only at Lincoln. District officials had been looking at moving part of the program in 2008 to High Point's Welborn Middle to serve students in that area.
Parents vehemently protested the move, which would have come on the heels of last year's move to Lincoln. Students had previously been served at Wiley Elementary and Aycock Middle schools.
Comments (7)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
Does RD mean ReDistricting? If so, then the rate actually increased from 60.2 in 2005 to 64.9 in 2006? The redistricting caused a statistical 'blip' creating an artificially high rate in 2005 and artificially low rate in 2006?
Posted on December 20, 2006 2:11 PM
In addition to RD, what do the following terms mean:
GD?
AJ_GD?
This isn't rocket science, yet it is being portrayed as such. There is no reason to use vague variables in these charts.
It looks intentional so that the general public can't understand it.
Posted on December 20, 2006 2:17 PM
I'm guessing that they are GraDuated and AdJusted GraDuated.
Posted on December 20, 2006 4:15 PM
This isn't rocket science, yet it is being portrayed as such. There is no reason to use vague variables in these charts.
It looks intentional so that the general public can't understand it.
**********************
Bingo! This is a common tactic employed by GCS officials. They intentionally make these reports as complex and difficult to understand as possible, so that the general public won't ask questions.
When the school board says they want "parent involvement," that is a bald face lie. What they want is an army of worker bees - adult volunteers who will do the grunt work in the schools, vote for bond packages, etc.
What they don't want are engaged citizens who ask questions, request information and hold the school board accountable for its performance.
Posted on December 21, 2006 9:15 AM
It's all snow material.
Like the 2.96% drop out rate award.
I bet if anyone, anyone really looked Zhang does
not have a real background in statistics. No one in the system has actually seen his acadenic credentils. He follows procedure as directed or takes averages. He calls them "means" it sounds more professional.
I have never seen him present a distribution and explain deviations etc.
He is very good at Power Point. Nice color cordination.
We put up with Grier we deserve Zhang.
Posted on December 22, 2006 9:43 PM
I also tried to find the educational background of Dr. Zhang. It seems that I recall his getting at least part of his education in China. I think his Ph.D. is in education, certainly not statistics or any math-related discipline.
Posted on December 23, 2006 10:43 AM
Most from China.
We think. Who knowes
Not only will the school system not tell me his background. Both they and the State DPI ( worked previously) will not tell me if they have actually seen his transcripts. Something smells.
He has an ED.d or something.
But no educators license from DPI.
What does that tell you?
He takes averages and makes multi colored pictures.
We let this happen. Why?
Posted on December 23, 2006 11:26 AM