News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

The Chalkboard

« Amos Quick to speak at Oct. 17 leadership symposium | Main | Board to study arts, music »

Why the double standard?

In case any of you were watching last night, it doesn't appear that many school board members are itching to burn through an additional $15 million in inflation for a proposed 2008 bond. And a few of them were quite perturbed that Chief Operations Officer Leo Bobadilla and facilities consultant Joe Hill would suggest adding another $47.9 million to the list to add an airport area middle school (at a total $40.3 million), funding for an airport-area high school and autism wing (total $87.7 million) and North Greensboro elementary school (total $25.4 million). Their reason: Might as well pay for it now because the kids keep coming.

Anita Sharpe and Amos Quick basically told Bobadilla and Hill last night they were crazy for bringing those kind of numbers to the board after they already approved a list of projects (at a previous amount of $440 million, including funding for Eastern High).

"$88 million, no matter how you try to parse it is $88 million," Quick said.

Hill later responded, "I understand, it's mind-boggling."

My heart went out to Quick, because those numbers were truly staggering. But after working on a series of construciton stories set to run this month, I have realized that it's the cost of business these days. During a closed session, I got into a conversation with a few folks about the district's apparent willingness to drop what amounts to some small countries' GDP on a high school. It wasn't the first time I realized that people apply a double-standard to tax-funded versus privately-funded construction and the debate about construction costs often get obscured by hyperbole.

For example, one person made a comment to the effect that students don't need a fancy school to learn in, that they could learn under a tree. But who does that and what parents in America would tolerate that?

I pointed out that most families of four in America could live in a two-bedroom apartment, but many don't. They want to live in a three to four-bedroom house and if they can afford it (and even some who don't) do it. True, governments need to be accountable with taxpayer dollars, but are homeowners being accountable to their neighbors or the general public when they buy or build larger homes, causing property taxes to go up? In some cities, lower-income residents actually have to sell their home because they can't afford the property taxes. Or what about the next buyer who inherits the inflated cost of the home because of appreciation?

I've also frequently heard people say that businesses are more efficient with how they spend money because they have to look at the bottom line (yet these same people don't have to sit in front of a public firing squad at each board meeting). Yet, folks will complain when Wal-Mart or Office Depot puts up a concrete box down the road from where they live instead of adding archways, brick facades, streetscapes and other features that would make the store look more welcoming to the public. So which way is it? Do we want cheap concrete boxes for stores and schools or do we want craftmanship?

I could go on, but I think you get my point. What do you think?

Comments (18)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

quest said:

Morgan,

I would like to suggest that you do a story on school construction in Forsyth County and compare it to Guilford County. Forsyth County can build nice schools for 1/2 the cost of Guilford County.

That's the problem.

Morgan Glover said:

I am actually finishing up a story that looks at that (particularly Reagan High).

Statman said:

My daughter played tennis at Reagan the other week and afterwards she told me that it was really nice Campus. I did not ask her, she just came out with it.

Wasnt Reagan High quite low cost compared to our costs?

Joe Stafford said:

When you look at construction in Guilford County, you have to keep a few things in mind. New schools are built with 100% borrowed money. We seem to be unable to use any current revenues for that purpose. Most people/organizations tone down their wants when they have to borrow all the money. That seems reasonable to me. Second, keeping up with the Jones's is a very dangerous thing. Wake and Mecklenbury is growing at three times the rate of Guilford County. I wish Guilford was a wealthy county, but it is not. We must face this fact. The tax rate in Greensboro is very high. If it goes higher, people will locate elsewhere. This means we will find it more difficult to pay the bills of government. Already, how teachers are the highest paid in the state. Having the best buildings would be nice but there is not enough money to do everything. Notice, how colleges get along fine with the use of old buildings. Why does the school system have to tear every buildings over 50 years down.

Morgan Glover said:

Joe, I understand you and agree that this is a serious challenge the district and taxpayers are facing. My only point is that if you really look at the financial landscape of America, you find similar attitudes about money. For example, look at the whole subprime mortgage spectacle where thousands of people borrowed with 0-down, NINJA, APR or interest only loans. This type of irresponsibility was validated on every rung of the financial ladder, from the homebuyer to the lender to the government itself. And in places like southern California, people borrowed half a million dollars or more for homes with no hopes of repaying the balance (yet you say people tone down their wants?). Public officials represent the communities they come from and if everyone could be frugal on a consistent basis in both their private and public lives, you would probably see more of that in the public domain as well.

You are right that keeping up with the Joneses can be a dangerous thing because no one can truly predict whether the income will exist 20-30 years from now to pay off the debts (otherwise we wouldn't have a thing called bankruptcy). Yes, Mecklenburg may be rolling in revenues generated from the banking industry there, but if a prolonged recession occurs, can the cities in and around that mushroomed overnight sustain all the people who moved there? A perfect sign of the times: government willing to give incentive packages to businesses even if they lay off workers. That's how desperate this state is for business.

Gatecity Keeper said:

Well we definitely do not want "craftsmanship" in our schools if the undisciplined kids are allowed to ruin the school.

I don't understand your point about the buyer of a home who inherits the inflated value and the higher tax value. No one made them by this particular home so hopefully they can afford the higher value. If no one buys the home the "market" will drive the price back down.

Actually I would not worry about these bond issues because they should all be defeated in due time.

Everyone should thank their lucky stars that this Board does not have taxing authority. That would inspire people to live in smaller homes or move out of the County

Wally World said:

Morgan,

If you want some intelligent comment and feedback on this strand, perhaps you should provide a short summary of your position. I'm not sure that I really fully understand your point, and I'm really having a hard time following your analogies and justifications. Are you advocating for the school bonds here?

Statman said:

Morgan, I would not advocate for Walmart style boxes either but I cannot agree with extravagance.

The Board also take the the stance that this is the cost of business these days but he indicators that the general public have is that other school systems build lower cost nice functional schools.

Why cant anyone show us proof contrary?

Morgan Glover said:

Wally World, et al.
I don't have a position on the school bond, either personally or professionally. But as a reporter, I try to see education issues from both sides, meaning asking critical questions of education officials who are responsible for taxpayer money and asking critical questions of the public who elect their representatives. I have heard people refer to Northern as a "Taj Mahal" by many people in the public. My question for the public is what makes the school a Taj Mahal? The price itself?

Statman, what would you consider extravagance in Guilford County Schools? Do you have some examples? I have also toured Reagan High School. It is a nice school, but keep in mind that the two-year-old school has already outgrown earlier projections and is set to get a 20-classroom addition.

Statman said:

I personally dont know if Northern is extravagant. But I do hear that Reagon cost less.

I would like a comparison of both features and costs of Reagon and Northern.

Joe R. Stafford said:

There is something to be said for building new large schools in two phases. Looke at Northern Middle. Last Spring it was about 25% full. This fall, it is about 60% full. Millions of dollars of construction sits unused for a few years. Building Reagan in two phases makes sense to me. One of things that bothers a lot of people is that we have a lot of under-utilized facilities. In most districts, the BOE would re-district to take advantage of the under-utilized facilities. But not in Guilford County, they sit empty while we are draging in Modulars at 80k each.

debora said:

Northern Middle is 98% full- not 60%! They have about 835 kids, capacity is 850. Look for trailers next year. The attendance zone is too big for this school! NW is still over crowded, but by only around 90 kids. NE? Who knows! I don't think they were overcrowded last year. They were on the bond and got an expansion. Poor planning as usual.

Northern HS is at 466 for 9 and 10th graders, with 2/3 of that being 9th. They prediced 392-- we are only 20% over that the first year. Look for 1200 by 2010.

Wally World said:

Morgan,

Reagan was designed with an additional wing in the plans to be added when it was needed. Atkins was built at the same time with the same design. The rapid growth in the Pffaftown area that is served by Reagan has dictated the additional wing be built. Growth in the Atkins area has not indicated the need for the wing. I believe that Forsyth approved $5 million in 2006 for the additional wing, which would bring the total cost of Reagan to about $30 million, still far short of the cost of Northern. Atkins can be expanded at such time as growth requires, but they are smart not to have millions invested when the need isn't there. It would seem that Forsyth is demonstrating foresight and common sense in its school construction.

Everyone that I have talked to about Northern describes it as opulent. From what I hear Reagan is nicely done, and it cost no more than 2/3 the cost of Northern. You say do we want craftsmanship in our schools. Craftsman is a synonym for artisan or artist, which implies skilled at an applied art. So, the answer that I would give is that what we need are schools that are functional and safe, not built by artists. I know that makes me parsimonious, but I just know that we can build schools that would serve the purpose for a much lesser drain on citizens and taxpayers' finances. Forsyth can and has done it. Guilford could it as well, if they had the desire to do so.

No double standard said:

What double standard? The citizens of Guilford County expect their tax dollars to be spent wisely, not wasted. We want solid, comfortable schools, not monuments to excess. What's so bad about that?

The problem is that the Guilford County Board of Education has done a terrible job in recent years with our tax money. Look at the recent construction debacle at Smith High School. Or look at the price tags of Northern High compared with the new schools over in Forsyth County. Not to mention the fact that bond money has been spent to build half-empty schools, while schools in other parts of the county remain horribly overcrowded.

If the public trust isn't there, the school board has no one to blame but themselves. No one should vote for any more school bonds until we get a more responsible school board.

Junior Burcham said:

How about this one; I am a life long resident of Greensboro,the people of Guilford County deserve what they get. When Election time comes the same faces return, yet everyone complains. What is that old saying about doing the same thing and expecting different result. If The "Gate City", see how many know what that is, were not my home I would be gone too.

Anonymous said:

Everybody says no more bonds till we have a better BOE. (i.e. a Board who can build something for nothing). Last year five Board seats were up for election. Two were vacated by the incumbent, but only six people in all of Guilford County filed for election. Why? perhaps because it is a difficult, complex, time consuming and largely thankless task.

Joe R. Stafford said:

Most of the problems you mentioned would go away if we had BOE members with core values, goals and a desire to make the changes necessary to get the job done. Our BOE does not use staff properly. It does not support staff when they are right. Most of the time, the BOE listens to the citizen on the street that may know little or nothing about the issue at hand. 55 other districts in NC have a BOE that can do better than ours. We have to have a BOE that understands that they are the problem not lack of money. We don't all the money we want, but we get more than most other counties. There is plenty to do better than we are now. It can happen.

Abnonfony said:

http://home-improvement-lending.net - san diego kitchen remodeling - asbestos siding, bathroom flooring, bathroom remodeling chicago - temo sun room, find a home improvement contractor, bathroom cabinet
copper roofing - cedar shake siding, vinyl log siding, roofing company - vinyl replacement window, quote home improvement, florida roofing
http://home-improvement-lending.net - bathroom remodeling chicago - replacement window maryland, sun room, vinyl log siding - residential roofing, bathroom remodeling philadelphia, residential roofing

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.