GCS moves forward on ed specs
The district's facilities department plans to hire a consulting firm to help develop a set of educational specifications for new construction, in anticipation of a proposed bond referendum. GCS consultant Joe Hill told members of a construction advisory commitee on Tuesday that he hopes to start the process in November and seek approval of the guidelines from the Board of Education in April. (A story about this ran today on B3, but was not posted online).
The specifications would define standards for class sizes, athletic facilities, technology and other areas. The district also intends to update its 7-year-old design guidelines, which focus on the infrastructure of a school, including heating and cooling systems, plumbing and roofs. The overall goal of these guidelines is to cut construction costs, officials said.
This is a big deal as most projects, even though they may employ a prototype design, are planned individually and are vulnerable to lobbying by those building the schools and those moving in. The ed specs would standardize how most schools are built and the design guidelines would cut out on some of the "frills."
Educators and members of the community would participate in this process, attending workshops to give input from January through March. Hill said he expects the firm's services (one of which is to lead the process without bias) to cost less than $150,000 (an amount more than that requires school board approval).
Comments (6)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
Now just when is it that everyone gets to vote down these bonds? Is it May 2008 or November 2008?
I still think any new bonds should not be decided until after next year's elections for the School Board. If you want to have a shot at passing these bonds there needs to be more qualified people on the Board; the '06 election was a step in the right direction.
I strongly believe that qualified people on the board outweigh the costs associated with inflation in not doing projects now.
Posted on October 17, 2007 9:09 PM
I wonder if Dot Kearns will be running again?
Morgan, Have you heard anything about that?
Posted on October 18, 2007 6:54 AM
vote no on the bonds, vote yes for e.c. huey
Posted on October 18, 2007 1:24 PM
vote no on the bonds, vote yes for e.c. huey
Posted on October 18, 2007 1:26 PM
i read on huey's blog that kearns, at the one guilford symposium yesterday, cheered on about having taxing authority for the system. I also see huey opposes taxing authority. if GCS gets this, I will move. they are not to be trusted with anymore of my money.
Posted on October 18, 2007 1:30 PM
Anonymous,
I would not worry about the school board getting taxing authority anytime soon. It would take a massive lobbying effort and legislative action to make this possible, something seen as unlikely to happen in North Carolina.
Posted on October 18, 2007 3:35 PM