Report: Many states backloaded NCLB goals
A report released this week by the Center on Education Policy shows that many states have chosen to postpone raising the bar on NCLB profiency standards, resulting in dramatically higher—and potentially unreachable—achievement goals beginning with the 2008-09 schools year. Other states, including North Carolina, set incremental goals in an attempt to make steady progress toward the 100 percent profiency targets.
Read the full report here.
Taking incremental steps is not without its own challenges. North Carolina students have struggled in the past to meet the stricter standards the state has set. The Department of Public Instruction is still waiting to hear back from federal officials on a request to not count the reading scores for grades three through eight for Adequate Yearly Progress sanction purposes. You can read the state's rationale in the attached letter (page 3 of the letter).
I talked to Gongshu Zhang, GCS's chief accountability officer, about this a month ago, and he said that he expected fewer schools will make AYP if the federal government doesn't allow the exemption. Zhang, who used to work for DPI, said that the department did not properly prepare educators for the increase in standards (which occur every three years) and so teachers have been discouraged when students perform poorly on the exams. Zhang said he thinks the state should have piloted the increased standards before implementing them state-wide.
Zhang said the percentage point increases in targets, for example, increasing from 76.7 percent in reading to 84.4 percent, appears arbitrary. He suggested increasing by a smaller percentage.
"You must give us solid rationale as to why this amount is scientifically based," he said.
That of course begs the question, how do you meet the federal goal of 100 percent by 2014?
Comments (5)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
Morgan,
I hope you're going to report on the pleas of the Smith alumni at last night's Board meeting. I was very impressed with their presentation and pleas for help with Smith's football program.
Did you notice that they thanked both Amos Quick and Darlene Garrett for their support, but never mentioned Deena Hayes??? She is supposed to represent them, but I don't think she's ever muttered the words Smith High School at a board meeting.
Posted on May 23, 2008 8:24 AM
Yes, I do plan to follow up on that. I have two stories to finish today so I might not be able to get to it until next week.
Posted on May 23, 2008 10:44 AM
Smith H.S is is meltdown. The Principal talks a good line but if you look at his results, you can only shake your head. For whatever reason, a change in Principals would be good for the school and good for the people involved.
Posted on May 27, 2008 3:31 PM
anonymous:
I guess Smith isn't doing any more building to rake in minority contractors. So why would it matter???
Posted on May 31, 2008 12:07 AM
Awesome Man :)
Posted on June 17, 2008 6:19 AM