Loan?
Does the Court of Appeals decision seem fair, or does Legal Bucks have a valid, legal, business model?
« McCain | Main | Rental inspections »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.news-record.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/nradmin/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2754
Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.
Comments (4)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
It's a wonderful ruling. Maybe the tide is turning against predatory lenders--including many credit card issuers.
Posted on September 5, 2008 10:05 AM
I believe the Court of Appeals made the right decision. After all, is it really fair to charge such high interest rates to people who are in such desperate need of help?
Posted on September 5, 2008 10:51 AM
This is another example of the nanny state - if people are dumb enuf to sign up for this type of thing they deserve exactly what they get - and if they cannot afford a product or service they should have enuf discipline & gumption to do without - and that goes for credit cards also -
Posted on September 5, 2008 12:04 PM
I believe the courts made the right decision. When you are fighting against insurance giants and your accounts have been drained, kids to feed and now out of work because of the negligence of another. Nobody has the right to feed upon your time of need. I believe the service is needed at a reasonable pay back price.
Posted on March 1, 2009 11:26 PM