George Gilbert responds
This morning we e-mailed questions that one commenter had for George Gilbert, Guilford County's director of elections. This followed a little blog talk that our 10 Plus on Gilbert received after it ran Sunday.
Here's Gilbert's response, from this afternoon:
Clearly your questioner is more interested in being provocative and inflammatory rather than informative. Under the circumstances, I would elect not to dignify his accusations with a response. I will share with you the latest article I have from Computerworld regarding voter confidence in voting systems (see attached).
George
Comments (1)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
"Who is responsible for reviewing the hardware/software used with our voting machines. What are their credentials for the job?"
That's provocative? No, Mr. Gilbert, the answer to that question would actually be quite informative and in the public interest.
Clearly, Gilbert is being asked questions he doesn't want to answer and his attacks of the questioner are a pitiful defense. He should reconsider and answer the questions.
Posted on April 11, 2008 4:33 PM