GOP on Moore, Perdue and Obama
So the North Carolina GOP has put an ad on the air criticizing Lt. Gov. Bev Perdue and Treasurer Richard Moore for endorsing Barack Obama.
I'm struggling with the tactical reasoning behind that decision. On the one hand, they party gets to ding Obama with the Rev. Wright flap again. And those voting in the Republican primary will probably see an endorsement of Obama as a bad thing.
But:
- * Moore and Perdue endorsed Obama for a reason and it wasn't to appeal to Republican primary voters. I somehow doubt this really hurts either of them right now and might actually help both in that it spreads the word that they've endorsed.
- * The general election is seven months away. Why not save your powder until you have one target to run against? In two weeks, either Perdue or Moore will almost certainly be the nominee and you'll have plenty of time to wail on them.
- * Since the Wright flap has not seemed to slow down Obama much here in the state, is it going to slow down two of his endorsers?
Here's the ad.
My 5-cent snark: If you're going to use Rev. Wright's comments, don't be so freaking squeamish and bleep the word "damn." That's like wearing a dinner jacket to a knife fight: it's overly formal and doesn't disguise your intentions to stick something sharp in your opponent.
I may have more on this later. GOP folks embargoed the ad release and I'm probably going to be a presser on the thing as this entry pops onto the internets.
Update: Linda Daves, chairman of the NC GOP, says the ad will start running Monday during the evening news. When asked if the ad was race baiting, she said: "The accusation of race baiting is one of the oldest used tools to drive a wedge between the people of North Carolina. It's a great way to divert the debate from the actual issues that on the table. So I simply don't buy into that."
N.C. Democratic Party Executive Director Caroline Valand differed in her opinion, calling the ad an example of "the same old southern strategy" and calling on Republican nominees for governor and president to renounce the ad.
"They're buying into old southern race politics," she said.
Update: It seems Sen. McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee doesn't much like the ad either. Here's an e-mail sent by his campaign:
Dear Chairman Daves,From the beginning of this election, I have been committed to running a respectful campaign based upon an honest debate about the great issues confronting America today. I expect all state parties to do so as well. The television advertisement you are planning to air degrades our civics and distracts us from the very real differences we have with the Democrats. In the strongest terms, I implore you to not run this advertisement.
This ad does not live up to the very high standards we should hold ourselves to in this campaign. We need to run a campaign that is worthy of the people we seek to serve. There is no doubt that we will draw sharp contrasts with the Democrats on fundamental issues critical to the future course of our country. But we need not engage in political tactics that only seek to divide the American people.
Once again, it is imperative that you withdraw this offensive advertisement.
John McCain
Comments (4)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
ROGER SIMON, POLITICO: "Well it's certainly nasty, I'm not sure it's unfair though. The media having run that clip a million more times than the North Carolina party ever could run that clip. Who's more guilty? What is unfair about the ad is the implication that Barack Obama sat in that pew and heard Jeremiah Wright say those statements. Barack Obama says he never heard it. Blah, blah, blah. Barack Obama is not past this incident and Jeremiah Wright is gonna come up in the general election, it just is. Just like people clinging to their guns and religion. He better get used to it. !!"
Posted on April 24, 2008 11:48 AM
Is the ad unfair? Well, I'd argue that our political system isn't really concerned with fair.
My question is: does it make a lick of sense for the GOP to be airing something like that right now? I don't see the tactical or strategic up-side - unless they think it's going to get them a bunch of money.
Posted on April 24, 2008 11:58 AM
You know what they say sometimes the truth hurts. I say run the add if the she was on the other foot the add would run and there would be far less press coverage about it. Obama has gotten a free pass from most media. Now it is time to answer some questions that most folks are scared to ask for fear of being labled racist. Just using the word change does not pruduce change where is the substance?
Posted on April 24, 2008 12:13 PM
In 2008, the biased media decides who will win! Let the ad run. The citizens should know the truth---early---not after we vote. The media suppressed the information for months and let voters be deceived. They attacked Hillary and puffed up Obama trying to run this election. Voters deserved to be informed of Obama's associations with radical, Anti American, racist, white hating, criminals and terrorists. It goes to the man's judgment of who he chooses to be in the company with. He has told too many lies about too many issues. We are the 50 United States of America --- not 48! The citizens of Florida and Michigan should be counted. Hopefully, these things won't happen in NC.
Posted on April 26, 2008 4:17 PM