Hagan: No to federal collective bargaining over-ride
In this post from over the weekend, I talked about state Sen. Kay Hagan and her position on unions. Specifically, the Democrat who is trying to unseat Republican Elizabeth Dole told our editorial board she might favor a federal policy that would force states like North Carolina to allow public employees to collectively bargain.
Cutting to the chase, Hagan says she misspoke. But a little background: For those who might have missed it, there's audio in the original post. But this exchange between Hagan and editorial writer Doug Clark will give you a flavor of what I'm talking about:
Clark: "This is (about) collective barging for public employees. So, North Carolina law doesn't allow that. But would you support federal legislation that would mandate recognition of collective bargaining writes for state employees?Hagan: "Not mandate it, but I would look at having the collective bargaining process available if the employees so voted on that."
Clark: "If the employees...?"
Hagan: "They would have the authority to make that decision."
Clark: "So, if the NCAE wanted collective bargaining rights, you would support that?"
Hagan: "Yes."
Clark: "Even though current state law currently prohibits that?"
Hagan: "Yes."
A spokesman for the campaign called me over the weekend to say Hagan was confused and didn't mean to say that, that in fact she would not support such a law. Because that was in direct contradiction of several direct quotes, I asked to hear from Hagan herself.
Hagan called me this morning while I was on the line with someone else, but left a voice mail. I've posted a portion of it here, so you can hear straight from here. It cuts off abruptly at the end because she launches into a phone number that probably doesn't need to be on the internets.
Click here for the audio of that.
"Once I'm elected to the U.S. Senate, I want you to know that I will never support a bill at the federal level that mandates states allow collective bargaining of state government employees. I truly believe that's a state's rights issue," Hagan said.
As the football announcers say: you make the call.
Comments (3)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
Hagan explains her position by saying how business friendly she is. What does collective bargaining for state employees have to do with business? Sounds like she is still confused.
Posted on September 8, 2008 1:26 PM
Roch: I won't argue with you there. My thought is that "business friendly" has become political code for "union-hostile," but I wouldn't make that leap without more information.
Posted on September 8, 2008 3:16 PM
The same thought occurred to me too, Mark. Maybe you can ask Hagan why she brought up "pro-business" as a defense for her position on the right of public employees to collective bargain. I'd also like to know her position on the proposed Employee Free Choice Act:
http://aflcio.org/joinaunion/voiceatwork/efca/
Posted on September 9, 2008 11:35 AM