News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

The Front Pew

« 'Top clergy' at Westminster this weekend | Main | 'Can I live?' »

The gap widens?

Is there something unsettling about the Antiochian Orthodox Church pulling its membership from the National Council of Churches, a move that some conservatives hope will prompt other churches to leave the liberal-leaning ecumenical body?

It's not that I'm lobbying for the National Council of Churches: Last year the Southern Baptist Convention voted to pull out of the Baptist World Alliance, accusing the worldwide organization of a drift toward liberalism that included growing tolerance of homosexuality, support for women in the clergy and "anti-American" pronouncements.

I guess I like the idea of religious groups of differing opinions at least having dinner at the same table occasionally.

Comments (9)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

George Frink said:

Good point, although the Southern Baptist Convention doesn't speak for a great many Baptists on this particular matter. For example, Baptist Sunday School teacher and former President Jimmy Carter spoke to last week's Baptist World Alliance Centenary Congress in Birmingham, England, and Baptists from all over the world were in attendance to hear him. The editor of the North Carolina Biblical Recorder blogged the gathering from beginning to end. There is, then, a good deal more sitting down together than current appearances often suggest.

Eric said:

I find it interesting that conservatives worked quite diligently to gain power over a long period of time using persuasion and working through the democratic process, back in the 70's and 80's. Now they are just picking up and leaving.

I guess their successes in American politics and the Southern Baptist Convention have given them a sense of entitlement to power. Now they're so used to life in the driver's seat, they can't bear the idea they might be out-voted on anything. What our world needs is less polarization, not more. Sad.

mrproduce said:

The SBC is loosing ground because of it's stand on women in the ministry. While the old hard line leadership may be in favor of holding women back from the ministry, many of the younger leaders are acclaiming women in ministry. Here in the mountains ,w here one would think would be last bastion to allow women in the pulpit, we see the walls crumbling and more and more women taking leadership roles as pastors. As a former Baptist, I say , Amen, it's about time. It would appear that the old ones have forgotten to read their Bibles and find that many women were leaders in the early church and that is the way the church must move if it is to do the work that was set forth for it to do.
I think that is why you are seeing more and more churches move from the "liberal" (what ever that connotates) organizations and back toward what the 1st century church was all about, and that was preaching Jesus, Him crucified, buried, raised again on the third day and assended into Heaven to sit on the right had of the Father until he comes to gather up his church (body of beleivers) to sit at the table where the feast has been prepared for them.
Perhaps this sitting down at "the table" is the begining of preparation for this feast to come.

Missy said:

I'm still waiting for someone to show me the part about denominations in the Bible. And Councils, Alliances, Conventions... wow. All I see in Scripture is the Body of Christ. Can you pull out of that? Would you want to?

mrproduce said:

It would seem that many have Missy. How unfortunate for them.

Eric said:

Nancy asked for further comments on this question, so here's my take on it:

> I'm still waiting for someone to show me the part about
> denominations in the Bible.

First off, I wonder why your correspondent thinks that the
Bible is the only place to find information on how to "do
church."

> And Councils, Alliances, Conventions... wow. All
> I see in Scripture is the Body of Christ. Can you pull
> out of that? Would you want to?
>
Second, I note that the Christian world, at the time the
New Testament was written, was just a few thousand folks at most, residing in singular gatherings in a few widely-scattered
cities in the Roman Empire.

The fact is that just like any human social entity, the
Church faced new problems of organization as its numbers
grew, and as the diversity of opinions (always a troubling
thing) grew as well. The options for dealing with these
problems weren't covered in the Bible because when they
came up, the Bible as we know it had been written years
before. The letters that make up the NT were circulating,
but they weren't the "holy writ" they later came to be. The
means for handling these "churchy" things came up through
people guessing at them... and once they had their guesses
ironed out, they became "tradition."

That's how a historian would explain such things as
councils and denominations. How a person could find such
stuff in the Bible to help this lady... I couldn't say.

christspeak said:

Hmmm. Early on, there was only one church. Luther was a devout Catholic
theologin who first translated the Bible into his native German. The
significance of this cannot be overstated. For the first time, anyone could read the Bible for themselves.

Prior to Luther's translation, there were many different sects within the Roman Catholic Church. And there were many rituals and teachings employed by church leaders that were contrary to what the Bible taught. Precious few monks were educated and fewer still ever read the Bible.

After Luther, the Protestant movement began. Revelation, the sudden discovery of truths within the Bible, led to the creation of other denominations.

Eric said:

"Early on, there was only one church."

Where'd you hear this, Chip? Ever study any history outside of the New Testament? Once again, I urge you to widen your reading base outside of the bookstore at James Kennedy's web site. {;-)

christspeak said:

bloody english... okay AFTER Rome accepted Christianity, there were 3 main churches: Russian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox and Roman Catholic. In the Western world, Rome became the one church.

I don't trust anyone named Kennedy.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.