Explore This Blog
Search This Blog
More Recent Posts
- Apparently not a bad argument
- No expectations of privacy -- even at Israel's holiest site?
- Preaching videos yanked
- Why Lambeth matters
- Burying Ben
- Still 'invisible'
- When churches and boaters collide
- Muslim French Minister: "Women who wear burquas live in prison."
- "The Only and Universal Smoker's Church of God"
- Christ = glow in the dark pickles!
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
Comments (5)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
Whew. Just...whew. That gave me chills.
Posted on August 9, 2005 5:24 PM
In 1957, my mother became pregnant through a failure of a birth control method. She seriously considered an abortion. If she had applied to the authorities for permission, I expect it would have been granted... her previous child had been born severely retarded.
For whatever reason, she went through with the pregnancy and gave birth to me. I never learned the enormity of the process of reproduction, until my wife had a baby inside her. I had always thought of sex in very respectful terms, but feeling a baby's kick made a huge difference to me.
I'm still pro-choice in my political life, but I think that everyone should find a way to learn of the serious nature of that choice, as well as options other than abortion.
In college, I knew a fellow-student who talked very casually of her two abortions, and it makes me so sad to think of her mental state. The way she despised children, never wanted to have any of her own to raise, I always wondered why she wouldn't consider getting sterilized.
The older I get, the more puzzled I become.
Posted on August 9, 2005 8:07 PM
Nancy- I think it was a gutsy move for this guy to produce that piece. And Eric, a mechanism for imparting additional information is the right-to-know law. These exist in other states, but the state legislature refuses to even let it out of committee in North Carolina.
Posted on August 9, 2005 9:41 PM
Eric, maybe she did consider getting sterilized, but even today, doctors refuse to it for unmarried women. I know because I have a friend who has been trying to have her tubes tied since she was 21 and NO (reputable) DOCTOR would do it. The arguments -- she was too young to make that decision, she might change her mind later, she might marry and want children and regret the decision....she's 33 now and still doesn't want children, though she's since had two abortions and had to use the day after pill once.
Posted on August 10, 2005 10:59 AM
I wonder about this. If a woman is old enough to make all major life decisions at the age of 21, why not this one? At first blush, this appears to be a case of an attitude that says the main reason for a woman to exist is to be a mother.
Another problem I have with this attitude is that it seems to imply that it is improper for a woman to ensure that no matter what sort of sex life she has, she'll never get pregnant. That seems pretty medeval (sp?) to me.
I mean, so what if a woman has her tubes tied and later decides she wants to be a mother? I keep hearing of this thing called "adoption." Surely that would be a viable solution in that case. What the heck is wrong with people??
Posted on August 10, 2005 11:48 AM