News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

The Front Pew

« I'm back... | Main | The Supreme Court ruling on child rape and the death penalty »

'Patient rights' vs 'right of conscience'

Is this just a matter of conscience for the owner or is this just the old American Way:

When DMC Pharmacy opens this summer on Route 50 in Chantilly, the shelves will be stocked with allergy remedies, pain relievers, antiseptic ointments and almost everything else sold in any drugstore, reports the Washington Post. But anyone who wants condoms, birth control pills or the Plan B emergency contraceptive will be turned away.

The pharmacy is one of a small but growing number of drugstores around the country that have become the latest front in a conflict pitting patients' rights against those of health-care workers who assert a "right of conscience" to refuse to provide care or products that they find objectionable.

Comments (3)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

Darryl [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

If DMC Pharmacy does not want/desire the business that the consumer desiring these products; Another one does! That other pharmacy will also get the collateral business these consumers bring in as well. So the loss in sales is not just condoms, birth control pills, or the Plan B emergency contraceptive.

While this pharmacy has the right not to sell these items, the consumer has the right to purchase them and that business will in all likelihood get more of the consumer's business.

Shalom

namtac said:

Agreed. You shouldn't force a businessman to stock what he doesn't want to sell. Fortunately, there are stores around that do. And in many cases, there's always going to be the Internet if stores become too rare.

Nikos said:

Wow, I'm duly impressed. I couldn’t have said it better myself. (Sorry, I hope I didn’t cause you guys any psycho-emotional harm by saying that.)

Indeed, store owners should have the right to do business as they wish. I remember when this subject arose before, that some of the liberal contributors felt that not selling these products was an infringement of the customers’ right to get required medical treatment – as if the stores were run by some government entitlement department. Thank you for acknowledging the owner’s conscientious objection and right to choose.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.