« What happened to turning the other cheek? | Main | Politics at the altar »
Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.
Explore This Blog
Search This Blog
More Recent Posts
- You're a caring bunch, Greensboro
- The power of a prayer shawl
- Bernie could have learned from Emily
- "Sunday's" worst behavior?
- Does Satan exist?
- Condoms not answer in AIDS fight, Pope says
- Faith in humanity
- Church Internet safety night with cop who poses as teen
- Land of the freelancers
- Catholics urged to give up texting for Lent
Archives
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
Comments (4)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
And of course, the fact that facts, logic and reason were used in the court had absolutely nothing to do with the way things turned out. :?
Posted on August 14, 2008 8:16 PM
Namtac, I suppose you're insinuating that saying "Thank You, Jesus" is just a superstitious religious response, and that all that took place was mere courtroom logic and reasoning, devoid of any supernatural assistance. I will certainly admit that such phrases CAN become rote and shallow at times. But, in this case, I would think it was a very heartfelt prayer of relief.
The idea is that God works in and through the circumstances of life, often beyond our human comprehension; that prayer is a cooperative, relational dynamic between a regenerate believer and his heavenly Lord, Who is said to be “a very present help in time of trouble.” The Scriptures are replete with examples of God’s acting in response to the prayers of his saints, OT and NT. Then there are the testimonies of believers now and across the centuries. It is not, of course, that God is our celestial bellhop, doing exactly what we demand. Rather, He answers prayer regarding outward circumstances in His own sovereign way; but ALWAYS grants us grace and peace to accept whatever He allows or causes to happen (Jesus on the cross; Paul in his persecutions and tortures). Faith is not demanding of God, but resting in whatever He decrees, a la Romans 8:28.
It was therefore altogether fitting and proper that Victoria thank God for whatever sovereign assistance He provided behind the scenes of earthly justice. God is said to turn the hearts of kings and other potentates in the OT. And Paul is often aware that God moved in the hearts and minds of those who could have killed him or provided a way of escape.
God is the author of justice, and the Provider of all aspects of our American system of justice, from whatever contingent human sources they were gleaned: Bible, Roman Law, etc. Thanksgiving is simply an acknowledgement of God’s presence and faithful providence. Your criticism appears rather snide and cynical to me in comparison.
– “in all things giving thanks.”
Posted on August 14, 2008 9:24 PM
This not "religious" news. Very little on this blog is.
Posted on August 15, 2008 7:01 AM
I agree, J.W. Some of these subject lines are a real stretch, having more in common with the National Enquirer. The popular, newsy entries do at times stimulate lively "theological" discussion; but I'm sure this blogsite is not intended as a seminary-level think tank.
I believe der blogmeister does a good job overall, but the quality and level of the subjects could DEFINITELY use some improvement toward the high end - as opposed to the "let's find all the trashy, negative stuff about Christianity" threads.
Good point.
Posted on August 16, 2008 8:16 AM