<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>To Your Health</title>
      <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/</link>
      <description>A checkup on health, medicine and related issues.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:21:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Uninsurable at any price?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[About 1 in 6 people shopping online for health insurance likely would be deemed uninsurable by most providers, a new study shows <em>(via <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/10/09/nearly-1-in-6-online-health-insurance-shoppers-are-uninsurable/">The Wall Street Journal's Health Blog</a>)</em>.

The <a href="http://norvax.com/data_report_download.pdf">report</a> (*.pdf)analyzed almost 450,000 people who requested a price or asked to be contacted by a sales representative. Those deemed uninsurable (or who might have to pay a prohibitively high price for insurance) typically had pre-existing conditions or were obese, according to the information they provided.

Two-thirds of those deemed uninsurable were women, with pregnancy or a prior c-section being major factors. But the significance of that figure is difficult to gauge because two-thirds of the online shoppers were women.

It is not clear how proposals to allow more people to shop for their own health insurance might be affected by this finding. It suggests, however, that any such plan, if it aims for universal coverage, will have to take into account the large number of people currently deemed uninsurable.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/uninsurable_at_any_price.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/uninsurable_at_any_price.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Insurance</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:21:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>In their own words (or words of their aides, at least)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This week's New England Journal of Medicine has pieces by the two major presidential candidates on their plans for health-care reform. Barack Obama's is <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/15/1537?query=TOC">here</a>. John McCain is <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/15/1537-a?query=TOC">here</a>.

The journal also has a roundtable discussion on health care in the next administration. Video is <a href="http://www.nejm.org/perspective/health-care-reform-video/?query=TOC">here</a> and a transcript (*.pdf file) is <a href="http://www.nejm.org/perspective/health%2Dcare%2Dreform%2Dvideo/data/NEJMp0807567.pdf">here</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/in_their_own_words_or_words_of.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/in_their_own_words_or_words_of.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care Reform</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:50:40 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Because I know you can&apos;t get enough of them ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[... here's <a href="http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2008/10/obamas-health-p.html">another analysis</a> of presidential candidate Barack Obama's health-care plan, this one by Maggie Mahar of The Health Care Blog, based on a review by the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan economic and social-policy think tank.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/because_i_know_you_cant_get_en.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/because_i_know_you_cant_get_en.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care Reform</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:13:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Neither rain nor snow nor gloom of night shall stay the antibiotics from their appointed delivery</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Via the Wall Street Journal's <a href="http://feeds.wsjonline.com/~r/wsj/health/feed/~3/56-ID4gFxBU/"> comes this news: In case of an anthrax-related terrorist attack, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/01/AR2008100102929.html">doses of antibiotics might be coming your way via your neighborhood letter carrier</a>. It sounds weird until you realize that postal workers cover the entire community six days a week.

Letter carriers "are constantly helping out as just part of their job, and this is taking it one step further,” a union representative is quoted as saying. That's not just blowing smoke. Carriers frequently check on older residents on their routes, for example. And I can point to one example in my own life. The morning after my daughter was born, my mother-in-law accidentally left the oven on in our house when she left for the hospital. Our letter carrier heard the smoke alarm going off and, finding no one home, roused our next-door neighbor, who tracked me down at the hospital so I could come home and make sure the house wasn't on fire.

]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/neither_rain_nor_snow_nor_gloo.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/neither_rain_nor_snow_nor_gloo.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Public health</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:53:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Awareness: Breast cancer, lead poisoning</title>
         <description><![CDATA[October is both National Breast Cancer Awareness Month and Lead Poisoning Prevention Month in North Carolina. The Guilford County Department of Public Health has information on both issues <a href="http://www.co.guilford.nc.us/blogs/dph/?p=765">here</a> and <a href="http://www.co.guilford.nc.us/blogs/dph/?p=766">here</a>, respectively. Go check it out.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/awareness_breast_cancer_lead_p.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/awareness_breast_cancer_lead_p.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Public health</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:44:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>CDC goes viral</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now has a site at the social-networking site MySpace. It's using the site primarily to try to spread the word about the need for tens of millions more Americans to get a flu shot this fall than have done so in previous years. (For the first time, the agency is recommending that all school-age children between 5 and 18, except for those with severe egg allergies, get the shot. Eggs are used to cultivate the vaccine.)

The site includes not only information but also buttons you can put on your own Web site or blog, touting the flu shot. The CDC hopes bloggers will help get the word out.

The CDC site is <a href="http://www.myspace.com/cdc_ehealth">here</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/cdc_goes_viral.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/cdc_goes_viral.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Flu</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:37:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>And speaking of research ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The New York Times' Gina Kolata had <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/health/30stud.html?_r=1&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink&oref=slogin">an excellent article</a> yesterday on how good medical research is supposed to work, how much weight it should be given and why its results are sometimes surprising. It's good background info for a general audience.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/and_speaking_of_research.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/and_speaking_of_research.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:51:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Do statins increase your risk of developing ALS?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In short, it doesn't look that way, so you can relax.

The question arose, The Wall Street Journal's <a href="http://feeds.wsjonline.com/~r/wsj/health/feed/~3/XQTDyDzfr0o/">Health Blog</a> notes, last year and prompted a review of several dozen studies that compared health outcomes of people taking statins with people taking a placebo. In short, reseachers found <a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121395851/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0">no significant difference</a> in the rate of development of ALS between the two groups.

A finding to the contrary would have been significant, given that statins, which lower cholesterol, are among the most widely prescribed drugs in the world. ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/do_statins_increase_your_risk.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/10/do_statins_increase_your_risk.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:43:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>At least a rhetorical exercise: The presidential candidates&apos; health-care advisers speak</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Although this may be a purely academic exercise in light of <a href="http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/new_federal_health_plan_doa.shtml">recent events</a>, the New England Journal of Medicine's Web site is chockablock this week with publicly available information related to the two major candidates' health plans.

At a forum Sept. 12, co-sponsored by the Harvard School of Public Health and the New England Journal of Medicine, health advisers to the two major presidential candidates offered their views. Links to video and the transcript are <a href="http://www.nejm.org/perspective/health-care-reform-video/?query=TOC">here</a>.

Also available online:
<ul><li><a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/13/1313?query=TOC">An examination of the role of campaign contributions and lobbying in U.S. health care</a>.</li>
<li>Statements from <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMp0807607?query=TOC">John McCain</a> and <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMp0807677?query=TOC">Barack Obama</a> on their respective health plans.</li>
<li>Critical outside examinations of both <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMp0806563?query=TOC">McCain's</a> and <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMp0806561?query=TOC">Obama's</a> plans.</li></ul>

There's a lot to chew over, and given recent economic events the temptation is to give up on any sort of health-care reform at all for now. But I suspect whoever wins isn't going to give up, so we might as well get some idea of what the winner will be trying to do starting in January.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/at_least_a_rhetorical_exercise.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/at_least_a_rhetorical_exercise.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care Reform</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:23:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Will you get the most effective treatment? Flip a coin.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Back in August, <a href="http://www.news-record.com/content/2008/08/16/article/some_drugs_are_ineffective_research_finds">I wrote about</a> how a lot of drugs and procedures either aren't effective or address symptoms without treating the underlying cause. Such waste constitutes roughly a third of the more than $2.1 trillion we spend annually on health care, and it's almost ten times the highest estimate of what we could save with a national conversion to electronic health records.

The waste isn't just money, either. It's lives. The Institute of Medicine estimates that the number of annual U.S. deaths from preventable medical errors alone is between 44,000 and 98,000.

The biggest reason why the waste is so enormous is, of course, how common such wasteful drugs and procedures are. And how common is that? Via <a href="http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2008/09/evidence-of-a-n.html">The Health Care Blog</a> comes an article in Miller-McCune magazine that says your odds of getting the best evidence-based health care are roughly 55 percent -- <a href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/article/691">barely better than a coin toss.</a>

The figure differs according to the medical problem, the article says: Breast-cancer patients are likely to get the best evidence-based care about 76 percent of the time, but hip-fracture patients get it only about 23 percent of the time.

More disturbingly, patients receive a type of care they actually <em>shouldn't</em> receive about 20 percent of the time for chronic conditions (diabetes, say) and 30 percent of the time for acute ones (such as heart attack or stroke), a trend likely contributing to the numbers noted by the Institute of Medicine. And socioeconomic factors don't appear to make any difference, so even the wealthy at the best medical centers aren't immune, so to speak.

The article examines how doctors practice medicine as the basis for why the best evidence-based practices aren't followed. And it puts some blame on patients, who may insist on a type of care they don't actually need -- an insistence to which some doctors succumb rather than risk a malpractice suit.

Changing this approach will be an enormous project, but the payoff in lives and dollars makes such change essential.
]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/will_you_get_the_most_effectiv.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/will_you_get_the_most_effectiv.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care Reform</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:06:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New federal health plan: DOA?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I don't know whether the administration's proposed $700 billion bailout of Wall Street is a good idea, either straight up or with changes proposed by Democrats. But I can do a little math, and the math tells me that if we taxpayers are spending this kind of money on this initiative (which may end up costing a lot more than $700B), there's going to be roughly zero left over for any kind of major government initiative, whether it's health care, public works, economic stimulus or what-have-you.
<strong>
UPDATE:</strong> There may not be any tax cuts for a while, either, and the sunsetting of the tax cuts of the early Bush 43 administration may now be a foregone conclusion, particularly if the Democrats strengthen their hold on Congress.  

]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/new_federal_health_plan_doa.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/new_federal_health_plan_doa.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care Reform</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:42:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>A study of virtual colonoscopy</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.news-record.com/node/5017">I wrote in April</a> about a Greensboro practice that offers CT scanning -- "virtual colonoscopy" -- as an alternative to traditional colonoscopy for detecting colon cancer or polyps that could become cancerous. A front-page wire story earlier this week cited a study reported in the New England Journal of Medicine that found virtual colonoscopy 90% effective in detecting large adenomas and cancers (those measuring 10mm or more in diameter). That rate is roughly comparable to that of traditional colonoscopy.

The article said Medicare is considering covering the procedure, and where Medicare goes, a lot of private insurers probably will follow. (We don't archive wire stories, but a similar story is <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/lifestyles/health/1170623,CST-NWS-colon18.article">here</a>.)]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/a_study_of_virtual_colonoscopy.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/a_study_of_virtual_colonoscopy.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Research</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:20:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Drinking from a fire hose of health-care wonkery</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Holy cow. If you thirst for more information on how the respective major presidential candidates' health plans might work, thirst no more. Jaan Sidorov at the Disease Management Care Blog posts <a href="http://diseasemanagementcareblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/welcome-to-health-wonk-review-political.html">a huge roundup</a> of links to analyses and opinion pieces. It's got to be at least a day's worth of reading, but then perhaps one day isn't too much to spend looking at the country's health care problems and the various proposals on the table for addressing them.

(Well, I say "on the table," but whether much of anything can get through Congress is a question for another day.)]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/drinking_from_a_fire_hose_of_h.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/drinking_from_a_fire_hose_of_h.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care Reform</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:05:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Analyses of presidential candidates&apos; health plans</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Via <a href="http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2008/09/17/mccain-obama-health-plans-critiqued/">the Health Affairs blog</a>, here are critiques of the health-care reform plans of major presidential candidates <a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.27.6.w462">Barack Obama</a> and <a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.27.6.w472">John McCain</a>. Health Affairs also links to an essay by an economist who sees <a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.27.6.w482">potential areas of compromise</a> in the plans.

Endorsement of the candidates' respective health plans, the critiques and/or the essay is neither expressed nor implied; I'm just passing these on for whatever they might be worth.

<strong>UPDATE:</strong> The articles will be freely available for only two weeks, so act now.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/analyses_of_presidential_candi.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/analyses_of_presidential_candi.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care Reform</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:08:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>ICE -- In Case of Emergency</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Do you have an ICE -- In Case of Emergency -- listing in your cell phone's address book? If so, and you wouldn't mind being quoted in a story, please <a href="mailto:lex.alexander@news-record.com">e-mail</a> or call 373-7088.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/ice_in_case_of_emergency.shtml</link>
         <guid>http://blog.news-record.com/staff/health/2008/09/ice_in_case_of_emergency.shtml</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Safety</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:05:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
