News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News

a service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

» Home

The Editor's Log

« The power of a name | Main | Meanwhile, back in the real world »

Republicans weigh in on the debate

So we asked members of our Reader Advisory Network -- a group of a couple thousand newspaper and online readers -- to e-mail us their thoughts on the debate: who won and why. We needed their names, their political affiliations and, because the debate ran late, we needed them quickly.

We published just about every one that made the deadline. Here's a taste of the feedback I got today:

"I believe again, that the liberal media has presented how they want the readers to be influenced. How many Democrat responses did you publish and how many Republican? And for your information, I am a BLACK Republican. Bush again, talked more about the issues and Kerry was up to his old tricks of trying to slam Bush. I hope he doesn't slam his way into the White House."

"You're too liberal!! You're like CBS and now ABC!"

"I was, once again, hoping for a truly objectional article from the News & Record and, once again, I was disappointed yet not surprised. You usually "stack the deck" on your articles, i.e. agenda, and it's very transparent. I think that is why you are loosing your conservative reader. I read what interests me in about 5 minutes on line. I prefer not to pay for "fishwrap"!!"

(Because I like what I presume is an unintended slip of the typing fingers on "objectional" for "objective," I left this one uncorrected.)

I promise we didn't pick-and-choose based on politics. We picked and chose based on making deadline and including name and political affiliation.

You, too, can become a member of our Reader Advisory Network simply by clicking here. It's easy and we'll publish your thoughts and opinions, too.

Comments (3)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

As a "Recovering Republican" I think I'm safe in stating: Locally, because of the huge influence of a popular right wing weekly that obviously flounts its right bias (the Rhino) those on the right have become used to being spoon-feed right wing views and see anything that doesn't agree with current right wing philosophy as being biased. They are blinded to truth by their desire to be in command.

Also, I know you're still new to web-logs so it's okay, but I think you need to check your links in this and the previous posts as both point to search engines.

John said:

Thanks, Billy. I believe I got those links fixed.

timv said:

>> (Because I like what I presume is an unintended slip of the typing fingers on "objectional" for "objective," I left this one uncorrected.) <<

I like this too. As though writer compressed "objective" and "objectionable" into a single word, and feels that objective reporting is in fact objectionable.

ADVERTISEMENT

Search Jobs by Category

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools

submit feedback