The word spreads
The Houston Chronicle, WRAL-TV, The Oregonian, The News & Observer and USA Today have called me over the past week to talk about blogging. Not for a story but to pick my brain -- what little crumbs are left -- about our experiences online.
All of the interviewers seem to be trying to figure out how to make the case to introduce blogging to their sites. I can't say that I'm particularly insightful. This isn't rocket science. I talk about interactivity, about transparency, about new readers, about complementing the journalism we offer in the paper with more depth and breadth. I encourage them to tell their bosses to learn about it first before judging, to ignore what they think they know, based on what they've read in the mainstream press (after all, you know how we are).
In the end, Ed Cone is right. There is nothing we're doing here that cannot be done -- and improved upon -- anywhere else. It simply takes a willingness to experiment, to let go of some control and to engage. Oh,yeah, and to decide that reaching readers precedes reaping revenue.
Anything else I should tell them?
Comments (5)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
Hi John, here's a howto I wrote for journalists starting blogs a few years ago. It may contain some ideas that are useful to the people you're talking with...
Posted on March 5, 2005 10:16 AM
I'm sure it's exactly along the lines of what you're doing (aggregating and publishing as opposed to authoring), but the Denver Post is doing some interesting things with weblogs and RSS.
Posted on March 5, 2005 11:44 AM
Uh, make that *not* sure. :-)
Posted on March 5, 2005 11:45 AM
Tell them not to do it until they blog themselves for a while.
Posted on March 5, 2005 2:38 PM
Great suggestions, all. Thanks.
Posted on March 6, 2005 8:26 AM