Not my Sunday newspaper column
A year ago, Lex asked readers what we should do to create a new, robust Web presence that would serve readers and the purposes of journalism. His insights -- and those from many of you -- launched us on a journey that has been exciting, instructive and, frankly, much longer than we thought. We're not even close to having arrived. But it’s been a great ride so far.
Our strategy -- no, that's too strong of a term -- our plan was to experiment, to learn and to let ideas bubble up. We didn't know what we didn't know. So we blogged. We solicited citizen journalism. We started podcasts. We added audio. We dipped a toe in video. We did slide shows and multi-media. We set up Hometown Hubs. Some of it extended our journalism, some didn't. But everything taught us something.
We learned that technology is often not our friend. We learned that writing a newspaper story, an online story and blogging about it takes more time than just writing the newspaper story. We learned that not everyone trusts us, likes us or even wants to be constructive. (Well, to be honest, we knew that already.) We learned that audio is easy; good audio isn't. Same with video. There's a reason we're newspaper people.
The biggest lesson was the one I least expected: rather than any stereotypical resistance, our journalists embraced the technology, enjoyed the public interaction with readers, and eagerly enlisted help on podcasts and multimedia. That, with leadership from Lex, Herb, Jerry, Michael, Charlie, Kevin, Stephen and a lot of others, was the key driver of whatever successes we’ve had.
Unlike the presumption that ink-stained wretches rebel at the idea that they "have" to do anything other than write for the print publication, most of our staff understands where the business is headed, and they want to play. During a staff meeting last week, reporters asked for more training with online tools and equipment. We have a waiting list for those who want to blog. (As I've said, we had some technical delays.) Publishing on the web first is spreading as more writers follow wherever the response on a blog post leads them.
A culture of arrogance and defensiveness? No, rather, a culture of experimentation and innovation. At least, that's our hope and goal. Granted, we have some folks who suddenly study the floor when we ask for volunteers for something new, but those numbers are small and shrinking. Instead, more are impatient and worry that we're falling behind. I do, too.
So, we're shifting into second gear.
From the beginning our online content has been integrated into the newsroom, rather than separate. Now it's time to get more organized and focused, which is what the new content team will do. It's not that experimentation will stop -- far from it -- but our experimentation will be more directed and intentional.
The goal: to effectively extend our journalism. To create that place described by Hugh MacLeod via Jeff Jarvis: "a point on the map where wonderful people cluster together to do wonderful things."
What to expect? I'm going to be vague now because we're still piecing the details together. But you'll see much faster expansion and greater dynamic content on the Hometown Hubs. A new Go Triad site that is closer to Lawrence than News-Record.com. More multi-media shows from the newspaper content and independent of it. More citizen journalism, including partnering our reporters with citizen journalists on investigative projects. More video. A much greater sports presence online. Comments on stories.
And that's just on the content side. There are other technological features we hope to initiate, too.
Do newspapers need to embrace online publishing? Does everyone have to participate? Do readers know more than journalists? Should newspaper staffs and online staffs be separate or together? Does the customer/citizen/consumer/reader have the control? Are the walls down? Are bloggers journalists?
These are last year's questions. Asked and answered.
Next year's questions for us are these: How can we move more quickly? How do we achieve the intimacy, the sense of belonging that myspace.com and facebook.com have that will not only keep users coming back but will make them look forward to coming back? In an age of customization, where do we fit most effectively? Mobile? How do we move the print newspaper forward with the same sense of innovation?
There are others -- feel free to ask them here. It will be fun searching for the answers.
Comments (8)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
More partnering with citizen journalists, eh? Any intention of reporting on this story?
Posted on December 18, 2005 11:19 AM
I've been a sporadic critic and supporter since you started this and I continue to wish you luck.
I must say that I've been impressed overall with your attempts -- you certainly are trying and it shows. I'm very pleased to hear you admit that bad audio and video are EASY to do. Too many newspaper websites think ANY audio or video is good (just because it's not static words on a page.)
Your next challenge will be to NOT take every big "Sunday project" story and turn it into a multimedia piece. You will be tempted. Don't do it.
Why? Because they are boring. Good journalism? Yes, but best suited for print/text not for audio OR video.
The trick for you will continue to engage the newsroom and reporters in coming to you with ideas while being able to deflect many of them. Their ideas of still images on a black background in -- gasp -- FLASH are not what make people click on a website. Even TV station websites that have tons of access to video (GOOD VIDEO) find it makes up fewer than 5 percent of their page views.
Here's an idea: WATCH TV NEWS. See what they do. These people, while admitedly not the brightest journalists, DO KNOW what people want.
They constantly think about RATINGS and making people become interested in their product. When is the last time a print reporter said "gosh, I need to this BIG 50-inch project think-piece because a lot of people are really going to want to read it"?
Next, hire or designate a videographer. Full time. This Flash-still-images-with-random-sounds stuff is just lame and web site viewers know it.
When you smartly say that good video and audio is hard to do, you must remember that things that are hard to do, don't typically get done with the same number or kind of resources that you already have.
Again, good luck...
Posted on December 18, 2005 11:22 AM
Roch, that's the sort of story we'll partner on, although I doubt we'll join with you on that one. Hats off to you.
Posted on December 18, 2005 5:02 PM
It is but it isn't.
Frankly, I'm not seeking to get exposure on this one, John. I simply think it's an important issue. Thus my question wasn't about whether or not we might partner on it, but rather if you have any intention of reporting it to your readers?
Posted on December 18, 2005 6:05 PM
Yes, we'll follow up on your reporting.
Posted on December 19, 2005 10:16 AM
Wow.. the silence here is deafening.. I guess people are all on vacation...
Posted on December 20, 2005 8:31 PM
Appreciate your concern, Jim, but while I don't have that much experience with blogs at Christmas, I know that letters to the editor of newspapers drop off the cliff during the holidays. Doesn't matter what is happening in the news; people have other things to occupy their minds during the last two weeks of December. Go figure.
Posted on December 21, 2005 9:15 AM
I teach at Smith HS and the News Record was my model for blogging my history class - search rickrowlandsmith at blogspot - we need to get blogging in the classroom like newspapers in the classroom
Posted on December 21, 2005 3:32 PM