Beau Dure, a regular commenter here, wrote this e-mail to Jay Rosen. With permission, I reprint part of it:
Jay --
Thanks for coming to visit us at USA TODAY. I was glad you were able to stop by the "blogger summit" in addition to your presentations in the auditorium.
I see you're continuing your tour of places on my resume and going to Greensboro (JR's blog is one of my regular reads). I'm curious to see what you get out of that. By all accounts, they "get it" and are doing everything "right." I think that was true when I was there -- I spent a large chunk of my time helping community groups publish sites under our umbrella, and we even did some content in 1997 that would be recognized as a "blog" today. But for all the plaudits they're winning among folks like you and me, what's the impact in the community itself?
I'm actually wondering if they had the right idea back when I was there almost 10 years ago. All the talk of community on the Web today is on the individual level. It's not on the group level. In the old days, we were getting everyone from the Chamber of Commerce to a Frisbee club online. Today, a couple of cranks dominate the comments on JR's blog. For all the great work JR and Lex are doing, I think that's an unfortunate result. (Fortunately, not the only result.)
The problem isn't what JR and Lex are bringing to the table. Take away the comments, and the Editor's Log is fantastic. It's transparency at its best. It's just a pity some readers don't want to meet him halfway. My hunch is that the readers who skip the comments get more out of it.
Putting aside the cranks observation, I hope you'll weigh in on Beau's question of Jay: What's the impact in the community itself?
(I have a few thoughts, but they are more about how being part of the blogging community has changed us. More on that later. I'm pretty sure I'm not the best person to draw conclusions about the community impact.)