How the newsroom works
Perhaps inspired by Xark's Internets operation, a friend, not Dan, sent me his rendition of a news operation in two forms:

**********************************************************************

« Ain't gonna happen | Main | Video »
Perhaps inspired by Xark's Internets operation, a friend, not Dan, sent me his rendition of a news operation in two forms:

**********************************************************************

Comments (31)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
Ah-ha, just as I suspected:
"INSERT THE DAY'S BIAS" sits aquarely in the middle of the process! :)
Posted on November 5, 2006 10:19 AM
Yeah, but with all the complaining, planning food outings, and surfing the Internet, how do we have enough time to worry about inserting bias? ;-)
And personally, I love calling reporters late at night for the fun of it -- they're always so chipper! ;-)
Posted on November 5, 2006 4:41 PM
But jaycee, it doesn't say bias in favor of what! :)
Posted on November 5, 2006 6:15 PM
What I'd like to know is why you can't report the facts without the bias. Why not report what canditates have voted on, all bills they supported or voted against, rather than endorsements that are based on political ideology or opinion. Then coverage wouldn't be biased and the people who read your paper would have the facts rather than your interpretation of them.
Posted on November 6, 2006 9:29 AM
It would help to have some specifics about bias, But in general those are two different issues, Ginger. Profiles of candidates and races do touch on issues, but to list all the bills supported or opposed would be confusing and less helpful than you might think. Editorials -- which don't involve the news reporters -- are supposed to be opinion and they are based on voting records and political ideology.
Posted on November 6, 2006 9:41 AM
What I'd like to know is why you can't report the facts without the bias. Why not report what candidates have voted on, all bills they supported or voted against, rather than endorsements that are based on political ideology or opinion.
I think you're looking at the box to the right of "Design paper" for the answer to that, matey.
Posted on November 8, 2006 9:24 AM
I think Ginger thinks he/she may have stumbled onto a real newsroom flowchart. What's a blog, anyway????? ;)
Posted on November 10, 2006 11:40 AM
If this were proportionate, like the Peters Projection world map,
>
then the box marked "Get Coffee" would be the size of South America.
Posted on November 10, 2006 11:46 AM
True, Chicago, and "Flirt with new staffer" would be up there, too.
Posted on November 10, 2006 11:56 AM
...and just how many of you in the comment section found this item by reading Romenesko?
Posted on November 10, 2006 12:21 PM
Totally hysterical.
Where is the part when we have birthday cake? And where is "forget about visuals until last minute?"
Posted on November 10, 2006 12:36 PM
Andy Rhinehart, webmaster for GoUpstate and the commissioner of the Manly Football League for 16 years, commented that the diagram was inaccurate because it left out the "build fantasy football dynasty" box...
Posted on November 10, 2006 12:47 PM
You forgot to add: 10 a.m. -- Newsroom publishing system breaks down and IT is called to reboot. 2:30 p.m. Newsroom publishing system breaks down and paginators are forced to rebuild lost pages. 5 p.m. Newsroom publishing system crashes for the third time and page designers for a second time are forced to rebuild their work.
The lack of investment by owners of newspapers is causing journalists to re-do work every day, multiple times a day.
Posted on November 10, 2006 1:05 PM
CLopez: Perhaps you work at a cheap newspaper with an antiquated, crash-prone system. I don't, and most of my friends don't. Sure, there's the stuff you expect from any computer, but three widespread crashes a day?
Don't project your paper's problems on the entire industry.
Posted on November 10, 2006 1:23 PM
The "write stories" box needs to be a couple of different boxes.
You're forgetting:
mentally prepare yourself to talk with a source you find annoying.
Try, in vain, to think of a new lede for the 27th story on a particular subject.
Posted on November 10, 2006 2:13 PM
Re: Insert the day's bias
Lighten up, folks, it's a joke.
Remember jokes?
Those things that we all used to laugh about before we started only listening to/watching/hearing that which confirms our *own* biases.
So sad.
-- neil
PS: From what I see your newsroom is less dysfunctional than those where I've worked. I'm jealous.
Posted on November 10, 2006 2:36 PM
There's another missing entry: Take phone call from aggrieved reader who insists that reference to "blue jeans" is a liberal code for a bias against red states.
(Are you listening, Ginger?)
Posted on November 10, 2006 2:44 PM
Yikes folks, I mean, just yikes: It's a spoof. "Insert the day's bias" is a joke. Get it? The whole thing is a gag. Get it yet?
Posted on November 10, 2006 2:56 PM
Hilarious. Where is "Joke with co-worker about story detail/source"? (And count me among those who linked to this from Romanesko.)
Posted on November 10, 2006 3:00 PM
BobH -- where on earth do you work? It must be a "real" newspaper, like the NY Times or Chicago Tribune! The vast majority of reporters are still working their way up the ladder (or out of the business eventually, due to frustration at poverty-level wages and management incompetence and apathy) at small and/or crappy papers with one IT guy who wasn't good enough at working computers to get a real job in a booming industry.
Posted on November 10, 2006 4:16 PM
Newsroom is sentimental rubbish, chief! We're an Information Center.
Posted on November 10, 2006 5:49 PM
Great stuff. Don't forget to tune into the 5pm local TV news and see your story from the day before done verbatim without any credit to the paper.
Posted on November 10, 2006 6:22 PM
Where's "concoct expense report" ?
Posted on November 10, 2006 7:47 PM
hey that chart looketh familiar! Now where was I with my story..
Posted on November 10, 2006 10:37 PM
Two comments:
1.) The "bias" observations does not sit squarely in the middle of the page. It is an octagon.
2.) The mere fact an editor took the time to post this makes moot of the first diagram.
Well done!
Posted on November 11, 2006 4:41 AM
The design aspect is missing a few steps. "This story is boring" should be larger, and there should be a square with "Duh." There also should be one for "Spend 2 hours looking at SND magazine."
Posted on November 11, 2006 1:17 PM
Where's "retrieve [star-reporter/copydesk/publisher] from bar next door"? Have you no respect for tradition? And where is "Carefully read and process all press releases helpfully submitted by brilliant and poorly compensated public relations professionals?"
Heh.
Posted on November 11, 2006 6:16 PM
You forgot to add: Hound reporter for the 11 a.m. online update.
Posted on November 11, 2006 9:32 PM
Oh - you left out this box - FIELD FOUR PHONE CALLS FROM THE SAME FOUR GROUCHY (and I assume from the timing of the calls in the middle of the day - retired) READERS - TWO LIBERAL, TWO CONSERVATIVE - WHO HAVE IRREFUTABLE PROOF OF THE PAPER'S BIAS BY THE STORY YOU SELECTED.
(And ... oh ... it's the same story. That's usually five minutes a call. Leaving theoritically only 7 hours and 40 minutes to get coffee - which I don't drink - and other such *duties*).
I'm also gratified to know critics of newspapers go for eight-hour stretches without pausing to consume liquids! LOL.
(From a former national editor!)
Posted on November 13, 2006 6:50 AM
Hey, guys, I reside and work in Kazakhstan, but our newsrooms do work the same way :)
Just one thing to be added "Call my mummy"
Posted on November 15, 2006 9:38 AM
John Robinson....you are my hero lol
Posted on February 11, 2007 4:59 PM