How to complicate blogging, 101
The headline of a post at Romenesko, wonders: "How should papers deal with staffers with personal blogs?"
That one's easy: Link to them.
And Gillmor's dead-on take.
« The BCS vote -- an explanation | Main | The top stories of the year, according to you »
The headline of a post at Romenesko, wonders: "How should papers deal with staffers with personal blogs?"
That one's easy: Link to them.
And Gillmor's dead-on take.
Comments (1)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
What about newspaper blogs where the staffer bans people he doesn't agree with, edits posts to change arguments (his and others), and deletes posts when they refute what he is saying? What if several people make the same accusation about this staffer and by coincidence, they are all ideologically and politically in disagreement with this person?
JR, you, Allen and Doug are fair and honest brokers on your blogs. I can't say the same for everyone at your paper. We both know who I'm talking about.
Posted on December 4, 2006 9:43 PM