News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

The Editor's Log

« Word play, or writing short | Main | Elected official outs anonymous commenters »

Building trust in a distrustful community

My newspaper column


Several years ago, a consultant surveyed a cross-section of our readership to determine the emotional connection people had with the newspaper. His conclusion:

"They love to hate you," he said. "I've never seen it so predominant in a market before."

I thought of that study last week as I read the results of the 2006 Social Capital Community survey. One of its major conclusions is that Greensboro residents are more distrustful of government, police and each other than other cities surveyed.

The study did not question residents about the newspaper, but national studies have documented a long-term decline in consumer trust of all news media. Fortunately, a study last year trust in newspapers remains relatively high -- about 75 of respondents in a national survey said they trust their local newspaper most of the time or just about always.

In a way, the overall decline in trust makes sense. News outlets have increased over the years -- many of us remember the days of three television channels and two daily newspapers -- and now people literally have millions of options. With so many choices, news consumers have become more discerning and skeptical. Meanwhile, the level of social discourse has amplified and coarsened.

Likewise, the results of the Social Capital study aren't all that surprising. It's easy to think of contributing factors: the SBI investigation of the Greensboro police department; City Council submitting to lie detector tests and accusing one of its own members of leaking a confidential document; the Truth and Reconciliation process; the firing of the county manager; the finger-pointing accusations of racism.

That's only from the past year.

These are divisive, emotionally-charged stories, and we have covered them aggressively. Too aggressively for some. Inevitably, a politician or another newspaper sling mud in our direction and suggest newspaper coverage is the problem. Shooting the messenger becomes an easy defense, but I believe most readers see through it.

Yet it has the effect of eroding trust. Skepticism of community institutions can be healthy; distrusting them isn't. It behooves those institutions to work harder to build a sense of belonging and connection.

We have introduced new features recently to do just that.

We added a consumer columnist, Tom Taylor, to help you solve problems. We added a second local columnist, Jeri Rowe, to write about the special people and places around here. We created more community publications that focus on life in your neighborhood.

We have emphasized keeping a closer eye on government, writing about veterans affairs well before Walter Reed made the news; shoddy tires on the buses that carry our children to school; and bureaucratic Homeland Security regulations that play havoc with the lives of some local residents.

If trust is built through the open exchange of ideas, we continue to expand the ways you can interact with us. We operate more than a dozen blogs, and we expect to add more in the coming weeks. Anyone can comment, challenge us and add information to stories we publish online. Supporting information for our stories -- and it could be video, audio or written documentation -- is also available online.

To measure our accuracy, we randomly send surveys to people quoted in our stories asking whether we portrayed them fairly. Last year, 157 surveys were returned, and all but 13 said we got it right. We plan to improve on that this year.

But news coverage isn't the only way we try to bolster community ties. Since 2000, the News & Record has returned almost $3 million to the region through donations and sponsorships to 96 agencies, including the United Way; United Arts Council; Kids Voting; One City, One Book; Reading Connections; the Salvation Army; the Greensboro Children's Museum; Community Theatre; the International Civil Rights Center; and the Shakespeare Festival.

We know that we must earn your trust every day by presenting a faithful, accurate portrayal of the community. We try to do that from the front page to the last. My request is that you let us know when we don't.

Back to the consultant who told us that many readers loved to hate us. "It's not necessarily a bad thing," he said. "It means that you provoke them, which is one thing newspapers are supposed to do, and that they read you."

In the end, our challenge is to fulfill the mission that our company's founder, Frank Batten, gave to us 30 years ago.

"A great newspaper is distinguished by the balance, fairness and authority of its reporting and editing. Such a newspaper searches as hard for strengths and accomplishment as for weakness and failure. Rather than demoralize its community, the great newspaper will, by honest and intelligent journalism, inspire people to do better."

Comments (4)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

Ginger Bush said:

This is utterly ridiculous, given all. Balance and, fairness are hardly hallmarks of your newspaper. If they had been, you would have covered the issues I brought to your attention regarding the Mayo River, long before now.

Ginger Bush said:

"This is utterly ridiculous, given all."

Given all the coverage you supply on any issue that has even the slightest racial tinge.

jaycee said:

Just what kind of "trust" are we talking about here? I trust the N&R to be in the newsstands on time, to have a local and a sports section, to have a movie and TV schedule, etc.
I do not trust the N&R to publish fair and impartial news articles done by it's reporters.

Jill Williams said:

John,
Sorry I'm just now getting here, but I'm disappointed by your list of examples of why trust of government institutions in Greensboro would be so low. You wrote:

"Likewise, the results of the Social Capital study aren't all that surprising. It's easy to think of contributing factors: the SBI investigation of the Greensboro police department; City Council submitting to lie detector tests and accusing one of its own members of leaking a confidential document; the Truth and Reconciliation process; the firing of the county manager; the finger-pointing accusations of racism."

First, to include the truth and reconciliation process with these others as an example of factors contributing to low levels of trust in institutions is to deny the opposite intentions of the grassroots group of people who put a process in place precisely because they recognized the need for holding institutions accountable and, therefore, building trust. Were there things about the TRC process that hurt trust in this community and its institutions? Sure. But it is my view that those factors rest in elements external to the process and it is those elements that would have been a better fit into your list. For example, citing the City Council's opposition to the process or the subject matter that the TRC was researching (killings on Nov. 3, 1979) would have made much more sense in terms of examples for why trust in our government institutions and police department might be so low.

Second, "the finger-pointing accusations of racism"? Now, I don't follow county politics so much, so can't comment there. But the only finger-pointing I have seen with regard to Greensboro politics in terms of accusations of racism has been in an offensive political cartoon in Sunday's paper. I've seen others, including those in the Pulpit Forum, patiently try to explain their analysis of the racist culture within which these examples to which you point have taken place. But even if you disagree with that characterization, how exactly do accusations of racism on the part of institutions, if not accurate, contribute to distrust of these institutions? If the accusations are accurate, then the cause of the distrust is not the accusation, rather, it is the culture itself. If the accusations are inaccurate, then wouldn't the distrust for the accuser (not a representative of the institution) be inflated rather than distrust of the institution?

Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.