News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

The Editor's Log

« Outsourcing | Main | Presidential candidate logos »

Good ole Willie Sutton

Whenever someone robs a bank, are you interested in knowing how much they took? Do you notice that the newspaper doesn't usually tell you that information? (The police department usually doesn't release it.)

Earlier this week, we published the amount stolen in a series of bank robberies. (The information was on the arrest warrant.) As a result, I've had conversations with a banker who has politely objected. The banking industry's position is that we should never publish the amount of money taken in a heist. It gives would-be robbers too much information, which could be enough to tip them from "would be" to "actual." In addition, that so-called encouragement would mean more robberies and more banking personnel put in danger.

Now, I think people know that a great deal of money is stored in banks, and that people rob banks because that's where the money is. While we have no desire to harm the innocent, it's hard for me to buy that by publishing the amount of money taken in a robbery, it encourages other robberies.

But I could be wrong. I checked with a couple other newspaper editors in the state. Both said they would publish the info if they had it.

Then the banker said that the reader doesn't care about the amount of money taken anyway. They just care the bank was robbed.

So, is the amount important to you?

Comments (2)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

Mark Binker said:

I've always been amazed by the repository of useful criminal knowledge that some people believe the newspaper to be. I'm surprised we don't send more subscriptions to the jailhouse.

I would tell your banker friend, politely, that the idea that reporting the amount of money stolen from a bank heist would prompt more bank robberies seems to be a bit of a stretch. However, if he has some actual scientific data or research to back up the assertion, I'd love to see it.

The other thing I'd say is this: if the information is in a public document, and it relates to incident that we're reporting, it should go into the paper. Certainly if the perpetrators are ever caught, tried and convicted, the amount they stole will be relevant to their sentence. Why would it not be relevant to readers?

Mel said:

Heck, yes, I want to know! It's much more interesting to me if they get away with $25,000 than if they get away with $1,000.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.