The value of embargoed information
I just received an e-mailed news release from a Raleigh group called Action for Children North Carolina about its new report on corporal punishment. A few minutes before that I got a news release on the local winners of the National Merit $2,500 scholarship winners.
Today is Monday; both releases are embargoed until Wednesday.
Normally when information with strings attached is exchanged, both sides agree to the strings. Given that I did not agree to embargo the information from National Merit or Action for Children -- both releases were sent unsolicited -- am I bound to honor the embargoes?
We don't care for embargoes, although we agree to them on occasion. They rarely help us or, more important, our readers.
But the tradition, I think, is to adhere to the requested embargo date, although I can't think of a good reason why. Now, with publishing in the hands of many, rather than few, isn't it time for this practice to go away?
Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.