Oil and gas prices are at a record high. Exxon reports record quarterly profits. The rights of working people and families trampled again.
Bob Davidson Jr.
Greensboro
« City's image problem comes from its denial | Main | Stang made most of life by touching others »


Comments (11)
Just how does a product being a certain price and someone selling that product and making a profit for it violate anyone's rights?
Posted by Paul Elledge | March 30, 2005 3:06 AM
Good point Paul. I bet there are conspiracy theorists out there who think it's Bush's fault since everything else is. Perhaps he decided to screw "working" people (by the way why do libs use this term for middle & lower class, aren't the rich working too?) by getting his buddies in the oil industry to jack up the profits and give himself a share.
Posted by Dan | March 30, 2005 8:04 AM
No, rich people don't work. Everyone knows they got to be rich by inheriting a fortune, being able to dunk a basketball, or by looking like Jennifer Lopez. Those are the highest profile rich people, so that's the common belief, I think. There is no "work" involved.
Posted by Rusty Sheridan | March 30, 2005 8:30 AM
Of course they don't work Rusty, the money just falls in their laps. That would include people who started with nothing but an idea and became rich. I guess Bill Gates, Micheal Dell, and the late Sam Walton never worked a day. Using only these three people, they totally changed the world for "working" people by providing cheap goods for the masses. So the "working" people should be grateful to these billionaires.
Posted by Dan | March 30, 2005 8:55 AM
Right, cause no working people work or own stock in Exxon. Whatever.
Posted by mr t | March 30, 2005 10:17 AM
This had got to be the lamest letter I've seen in some time.
You don't think the editorial letter review person/s are trolling us, do you? Nah.....
Posted by JayCeeNC | March 30, 2005 10:18 AM
I don't think Becky would do that.
Posted by mr t | March 30, 2005 11:44 AM
If that one was lame, this one was paraplegic:
Don't drill in Arctic
Citizens do not want oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The oil produced would be years in the future and only small amounts would be produced. There would be great environmental damage to many kinds of wildlife.
Mazie Levenson
Bill Tally
Greensboro
Posted by Paul Elledge | March 30, 2005 12:33 PM
Dan, surely people don't think the high price of gasoline is Bush's fault! What about all that talk we heard claiming the reason for our actions in Iraq was to get all that oil? I find it strange that these "theorists" are silent now.
Posted by bunny | March 30, 2005 1:03 PM
Bunny, I agree with you. The war for oil thing died out.
But if you are a liberal, everything bad is Bush's fault including when your cat gets pregnant.
Posted by Dan | March 30, 2005 7:26 PM
Bunny--
I don't perceive the "war for oil" theorists to be any quieter that the WMD "theorists."
Perhaps one objective of the war plan was in fact to protect our access to the region's vast oil reserves. It could even persuasively be argued that protecting our access was vital to our nation's interest. But, the president didn't have the testicular fortitude to make that argument did he. Nope, all we heard initially was WMD,links to Al Quaida, bringing "peace" to the region, and the importance of establishing a democracy in Iraq (why not establish one in Saudi Arabia, Rwanda, China, etc.).
As poorly thought out as this war obviously was, it is unfortunately not surprising that the Bush bunch may never have conceived that insurgents/terrorists/whatever-you-want-to-call-them would attack oil pipelines and production facilities.
Posted by timothy | March 31, 2005 1:25 PM