Many times issues that purportedly are about constitutional rights are just fodder for political expression or games to keep lawyers remunerated and activist groups in the news. Most recently a religious document was offered as an alternative to the Bible for the purpose of swearing in those of that religion. Even though the concern may be legitimate, this would further complicate an already unwieldy court system.
There is a fair and practical solution: Conduct the swearing-in with the phrase: "I realize I must tell the complete truth or be subject to criminal penalty." A lie is a lie; those with criminal intent are not usually influenced by moral values or religious conviction.
This solution would negate religious issues, and freedom-loving citizens would be satisfied.
Andrew H. Symmes Jr.
Greensboro


Comments (2)
One perk of a free market society is being able to operate, with a counter reality, under the radar.
Posted by steve | June 29, 2005 8:27 AM
What?
They should get rid of Bibles in courts anyway. Leave religion to the churches.
Posted by briankeithharper | June 29, 2005 4:18 PM