How should North Carolina respond to the growing use of methamphetamine? During the crack epidemic of the '80s, New York City chose the zero tolerance approach, opting to arrest and prosecute as many offenders as possible. Meanwhile, Washington Mayor Marion Barry was smoking crack and America's capital had the highest per capita murder rate in the country. Yet crack use declined in both cities simultaneously.
Simply put, the younger generation saw firsthand what crack was doing to their older brothers and sisters and decided for themselves that crack was bad news. This is not to say nothing can be done about meth. Access to drug treatment is critical for the current generation of meth users. Diverting resources away from prisons and into cost-effective treatment would save both tax dollars and lives.
The following U.S. Department of Justice research brief confirms my claims regarding the spontaneous decline of crack cocaine: http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles1/nij/187490.txt
Robert Sharpe
Washington
The writer is policy analyst, Common Sense for Drug Policy.


Comments (1)
Rehabilitation is most effective when coupled with punishment. Holding these people accountable for thier illegal actions is part of a good rehab program. One without the other would cause a revolving door syndrome. I agree with the rehab but only after punishment is administered.
Posted by Bill | July 30, 2005 8:14 AM