The article, "I want to see Dos" (Sept. 1, News & Record), should give many reason to pause and ponder the real purpose of this "social engineering" program. For what possible reason do our first-graders need to be immersed in Spanish or any other language? They already have a perfectly fine language to read, write and converse in. It is called English and it is the language of our country, in spite of the many who wish to Balkanize the country with bilingualism.
Having come from a bilingual country, I can assure you that this practice only results in a separation of ethnic groups, ethnic distrusts and, at times, open hatred and rebellion. This, of course, would delight the many in America today who think they would prefer living in a communistic system.
Although seemingly harmless, this "Spanish Immersion" program is a small portent of what we will have as Americans cease being Americans and pursue "globalism" and other fantasies of a better system of government.
Still sleeping? Wake up.
Ian A. Millar
Kernersville


Comments (18)
Uh, gee, maybe it's because learning another language is just a good idea in today's world. Maybe, just maybe it remotely has something to do with the fact that business is so global now. And don't you suppose it's better to have a broad education than a narrow one?
I strongly agree with you that we should do nothing to compromise our political sovereignty, but that's not what learning a foreign language is about. It's about economics and understanding other cultures.
I must say I'm negatively impressed by the writer's comments. I mean, why would you prefer not to be bilingual or even trilingual or better? Why would you actually make it a point to remain uneducated and limited in knowledge and your ability to relate to others? Or maybe the best way to put it is: Why would you make it a point not to learn something? Unbelievable.
Posted by Paul Elledge | September 19, 2005 7:20 AM
you think we arent divided already? distrust...lol! we all hate it when people talk behind our backs but when its in another language...people can talk about you right in front of you and you wouldnt know what they said...if i had to learn 3 languages...i would learn spanish, arabic and pharci...do i have a suspicious mind? sure. will you still see me trying out my salsa moves at Rumba Latina? definetly.
Posted by 6stringsamurai | September 19, 2005 7:42 AM
I am curious what country Mr. Millar is from. It's a pity he doesn't tell us, because that might explain his attitude.
I agree with you, Paul. Nobody is asking anyone to give up English. Our public school system is federally required to get non-English speaking children into mainstream English classes as quickly as possible. No Child Left Behind effectively does away with any bilingual education for immigrants. Immersion programs seek to compliment children's native language with a second, but NO child can graduate from and American high school without English. This is not going to change; I guarantee it.
Anyone who does not speak a second language is in a very small minority of the world's population, and, in my opinion, lazy, unfortunate, and limited in his weltanschauung.
Posted by nick danger | September 19, 2005 7:45 AM
Bilingualism = "communistic"?
Tell that to the Swiss.
Posted by nick danger | September 19, 2005 7:51 AM
W speaks Spanish. Does that mean he's part of the global communist plot? What about the late John Paul II? He spoke many, many different languages. Is the Catholic Church just a front for the communists? Maybe that's why the cardinals wear red!
Posted by larry | September 19, 2005 8:36 AM
I think it is cool that kids be taught a foreign language at an early age. After all, that is when it is easiest to learn. I tried to learn Spanish in high school and college and found it to be increasingly frustrating as I progressed.
Do I think it should be mandatory? No. But I have no problem with a voluntary immersion program.
Posted by truth | September 19, 2005 9:13 AM
I agree with this reader. My state, California, banned bilingual education several years ago...and it's working. The children of immigrants whose parents speak no English are fluent in English and have a much better chance to find jobs not picking strawberries, etc. Also, a friend married a woman from Mongolia last year. She and her 8 year old son moved here. The son spoke no English. With an English only school program, he has quickly learned our language. Please don't handicap these children by teaching them in their native languages.
Posted by Tony Morton | September 19, 2005 9:52 AM
Tony: I don't think the writer is addressing bilingual education for children who don't speak English. Rather he seems to oppose offering voluntary foreign language programs to children who speak English.
Posted by larry | September 19, 2005 10:43 AM
Seems to me that the responses to the original letter are confusing the question of the impact of multilingualism with the educational pursuits of a languag. If the purpose is to allow immigrants from any country to come to this country and continue their culture and ignore ours, then I question "immersion." If immersion is simply an opportunity for students to learn another language, shouldn't they be give the option of which language to learn?
History has proven that the erosion of the basic language of a nation is an early step to the demise of that country. To me, it all depends on the purpose of this immersion...culture maintenance or educational pursuits.
Posted by confused | September 19, 2005 11:29 AM
Mr. Millar's comments about the Spanish Immersion program is a fine example of the arrogance that makes Americans so unpopular throughout the world. My friend is housing a German exchange student who speaks perfect English. Why? Because it is a required subject for German students so that they can function in countries that don't speak their language. What makes us any different? Being bilingual enhances one's understanding of other cultures and, in our global enconomy, increases employment opportunities. It seems that Mr. Millar is the one who needs to wake up.
Posted by Cathey Holmes | September 19, 2005 11:40 AM
I wish I had learned a second language. Maybe if I spoke hick I could better understand our friends from Kernersville.
Posted by Budman | September 19, 2005 12:23 PM
Senior Millar, eres uno culo grande!
Posted by Joe Schmoe | September 19, 2005 12:24 PM
Confused:
No one is confusing anything. What sort of immersion program do you think Mr. Millar is complaining about? If it were Spanish classes for native Spanish speaking immigrants, I can't imagine such a program would be called "immersion".
Mr. Millar isn't complaining about some hypothetical universal forced-Spanish program. He's talking about an existing elective immersion program, although he's couched it in doomsday language like "social engineering".
Immersion programs are those that teach subject-area classes in a second, complimentary language -- one that is not the students' native language.
These classes are elective. Parents can choose not to send their kids there. However, thankfully, many do; in fact, there are more applicants than enrollees in most such programs.
The only required foreign language in the US is in high school, at an age when learning a foreign language has become a much more difficult task. In addition, it is at an age when students can elect to drop out of high school.
We do indeed live in a world that is becoming more and more international. Business owners who have multilingual staff can do business in other countries. How "communistic" is that?
Posted by nick danger | September 19, 2005 12:26 PM
Larry, my mistake. I took French as Grimsley HS...not that I remember much of it. I took German at Eastern Kentucky Univesity..and I remember less of that. I'm not a communist, however, I am currently taking another German course. What's the big deal?
Posted by Tony Morton | September 19, 2005 12:50 PM
Yo creo que es mejor cuando los ninos pueden hablar en dos lenguas. Cuando se habla dos lenguas, es mas facil hallar trabajo que paga mas dinero...quisas.
Posted by gaytony | September 19, 2005 4:40 PM
Great job, nick, of stating the obvious. I was addressing the nature of the letter. When did I mention communistic?
Posted by confused | September 19, 2005 7:58 PM
Cathey: "Mr. Millar's comments about the Spanish Immersion program is a fine example of the arrogance that makes Americans so unpopular throughout the world. My friend is housing a German exchange student who speaks perfect English. Why?"
Why Cathey is because Europe is a much smaller continent with a mix of languages, not like the US, so there is more of a need to learn other languages.
English is also the dominant language of business in the West, so Germans & others know they must learn English. It has nothing to do with our arrogance.
Not to say I don't encourage learning other languages, I speak fluent French and can understand/speak Spanish enough to get by. A bientot.
Posted by Dan | September 20, 2005 5:31 PM
its not like the program is disabaling and handicaping immigrant children if these readers had done any research they would have found that in the elementry school there are no immigrants in the spanish classes. in my spanish immersion class there was one person who was adopted from guatamala when she was 3 months old. she learned english and her mother wanted her to learn her native language is that a crime???????? i dont think so. also in middle school when we had new students come in who spoke english they were not entered into the program they had to go to a special english class. the only problem was nobody could communicate with them so the unfortunate nation splitting spanish immersion kids had to help tell them were to go i know its terrible what has the world come to????????
Posted by Claire
|
August 5, 2006 12:04 AM