Regarding Nathan Julian's "Hummer Draft" letter (Jan. 8), suggesting that wealthy Humvee owners enter a lottery in which their vehicle, if chosen, should be melted down to armor existing Humvees in the Middle East:
First, coming up with an ostensibly patriotic notion to convey obvious disdain towards Humvees, and their owners, is decidedly unpatriotic. The fact is a fully armored Humvee is barely adequate in East L.A., much less Iraq.
General Motors, which purchased AM General's Humvee name, is now fully aware that the 25-year-old technology is not a viable platform for troop transport in today's warfare. Even M1-A1 Abrahm tanks have succumbed to IEDs. Semi-secret concept prototype vehicles have been conceived, built, and are undergoing tests at assorted proving grounds.
Secondly, you don't have to be wealthy to own a Humvee; two of my friends own new Humvees, neither of whom earns more than $30,000. Both are small-business owners who used that status to take advantage of a loophole in the tax law that allows you to purchase a $50,000, three-ton vehicle for small-business purposes, using it as a tax write-off at the end of the year. Each paid less than $4,000 for their Humvee -- at least they bought American.
Parris L. Patton
High Point


Comments (4)
"Both are small-business owners who used that status to take advantage of a loophole in the tax law that allows you to purchase a $50,000, three-ton vehicle for small-business purposes, using it as a tax write-off at the end of the year. Each paid less than $4,000 for their Humvee"
So they paid $50,000 for a Hummer, and then were able to write off $46,000 of their taxes? How much did they owe in taxes??? $46,000 is WAY more than I pay as an individual. Did they get a huge refund?
Whichever, this looks an awful lot like the gov'ment subsidized their purchase. How can it afford to do that? Where does it make up that difference in revenue? WHY does the IRS allow this?
Posted by Astro Boy
|
January 19, 2006 9:38 AM
Good questions. Would love to know the answers. Since Reagan, individuals cannot even write off the interest on the cars they buy. Suggestion to those who can: Get a home equity loan to buy your car, then you can write off interest.
Posted by Carol Dunn
|
January 19, 2006 11:57 AM
A business (which doesn't take much to become) that purchases anything weighing over 6000 pounds can take a deduction for a beast like this - for small company guys like me, the money comes off the top, i.e., if I earned $200,000, spend $100,000 on a decked out Hummer, and my tax liability drops to $100,000 - NO taxes on the amount spent to cruise in style - let the other American tax payers pick up the tab.
It WAS $30,000: http://www.detnews.com/2002/autosinsider/0212/18/c01-38875
"At the same time the tax code sanctions $30,000 write-offs for SUVs, prospective purchasers of a fuel-efficient hybrid vehicles qualify for a relatively small $4,000 tax credit."
... but "In 2003, lawmakers expanded the tax deduction to a whopping $100,000 as part of the $350 million tax cut package"
http://www.selfemployedweb.com/suv-tax-loophole-2.htm
It was recently "rolled back" to $25,000 (the outcry of common sense sometimes win's over).
Posted by James D. Rockefeller
|
January 19, 2006 12:40 PM
Hummers are so ugly. Impractical lumbering vehicles.
I chose to get my 14mpg in a Mustang!
Posted by Brian Harper
|
January 20, 2006 3:09 PM