Rosemary Roberts' column (Dec. 8) on coaches' salaries was on target. William Friday, former president of the University of North Carolina, and Dr. Thomas K. Hearn, former president of Wake Forest University, appear to be the only North Carolina educational leaders who are trying to make necessary reforms in the NCAA that will save intercollegiate athletics from the dangers of destruction by the current arms race.
North Carolina is burdened by low SAT scores and low high school graduation rates resulting from the alarming number of high school dropouts. North Carolina ranks below the national level in per capita income. However, our state legislators and university trustees have passed and supported laws that will allow out-of-state athletes to attend our state universities at in-state tuition. This will only financially aid the booster clubs of these state universities.
It is indeed a shame that the highest-paid employees of the state of North Carolina are one basketball coach and two football coaches, while our professors and instructors in our community college system are ranked as the lowest paid in the nation. I think that it is time for a strong review of these programs that are funded for entertainment and not educational purposes.
Shirley R. Webster
Madison


Comments (6)
Shirly,
I am in total agreement that Americans in general have their priorities skewed. It is ridiculous what atheletes, CEO's, celebs and so on make. If the American public did not support this madness, it would stop.
However, how is letting sports stars from out of state attend at in-state tuition any different than letting illegal hispanics attend at in-state rates (plus get assistance)?
Posted by Yvonne
|
December 22, 2006 7:49 AM
Yvonne,
I agree with you but we both know that 2 wrongs don't make a right.
I don't see coach's salaries as that big a deal. If they result in nationally competitive teams, I think any research would show that they pay for themselves in increased enrollment, increased money coming in from private sources (booster clubs, alumni, sports merchandise contracts, etc)
As far as the in-state tuition for out-of-state scholarships, I agree that is a dumb and unnecessary idea. From what I understand, it isn't just athletic scholarships. Basically, it means that North Carolinians are paying the cost of these out-of-state students to attend. The only folks saving money are the people issueing these scholarships. Why are we cutting them a break and sticking it to NC folks?
Posted by nitpicker
|
December 22, 2006 8:38 AM
nit, it is not just "sticking it to NC folks." That is sadly the norm today, "stick it to your own first." Greed has led our society to this point. Another "Great Depression" will "right the ship."
I only wonder if we can afford another "Great Depression."
Shalom
Posted by Darryl
|
December 22, 2006 1:57 PM
I do not believe the Universities per se pays these salaries but the Athletic Depts which are funded by boosters, etc.
I am a little unclear on tax payer input to the particular kitty from whence comes coaching salaries. Perhaps some little blue letters are in order here.
Posted by Mick
|
December 22, 2006 4:07 PM
It appears Athletic Depts pay coaches salaries to the University which in turn pays coaches, etc. The AD money comes from TV contracts, Booster Clubs, shoe money, ticket sales, ACC shared revenues, etc. So quit the whining.
IE: Relax it aint tax $$$!
Now, how much is too much is another story.
www.newsobserver.com/122/story/427813.html
Posted by Mick
|
December 22, 2006 4:13 PM
As a community college instructor, I sure wouldn't mind making more money. But I wouldn't want to live the life of a coach, either. I also don't want to risk being fired if my team loses too many games.
In a more perfect world than this, the NCAA would regulate coaches' salaries the same way that they regulate students' scholarships and stipends. But it won't happen, not unless people truly value education more than sports and entertainment.
So, I'll continue to slog through as a part-time community college instructor with no benefits. I have the sure knowledge that what I do really makes a difference in people's lives. I don't have to be caught up in the hype that making a basket, touchdown, or home run is the most important thing in the world. Knowing that a student got a better job, or can read to his or her child in English, or can fill out a medical history partly because of me is ultimately a lot more satisfying.
Posted by Beadbaby
|
December 23, 2006 6:43 PM