News & Record, Greensboro, NC
,
°
Humidity: %
Wind: mph,
Market Place
TriadCareers TriadCars TriadHomes Triad Marketplace Business Directory Classifieds Newspaper Ads Featured Job Ads Archives Apartments Celebrations Obituaries Place an Ad Personals Print Advertising Ad Post Online Advertising N&R Store
ADVERTISEMENT
Special Sections
test
Letters to the Editor
Thursday, March 8, 2007

« Roman Catholic Church fails to follow scriptures | Main | Racism does not excuse elected leaders' conduct »

Only residents deserve in-state UNC tuition

I want to express thanks and congratulations to state Reps. Laura Wiley, Nelson Cole and Pat Hurley for their support of a bill that would repeal the law that allows in-state tuition and fees for nonresidents of North Carolina.

This law that allows in-state tuition for nonresidents has cost the taxpayers of North Carolina more than $5.2 million. There is no justification for this special law that benefits booster clubs for our victory-starved state universities. The repeal of this law will allow more recruiting of North Carolinians and fewer of out-of-state students.

I hope those legislators who vote against the repeal of this bill will be exposed and defeated in their re-election campaigns. The governor should have vetoed the bill when the trustees and administrators of the UNC system did not support or want this legislation, which currently remains a heavy burden to the residents and taxpayers of North Carolina.

Shirley R. Webster
Madison

Comments (5)

UVA grants "legacy" status to children of out of state alumni, and I am wondering if this is what the Board of Governors is seeking to do with UNC. If a child of a UVA graduate can gain acceptance, they receive in state tuition no matter where they live.

DD,

This is something else, I think. I think this involves the law that states that any out-of-state student who receives a full scholarship (athletic, academic or otherwise), will receive in-state tuition.

This effectively shifts the costs of the student's education away from the booster club and onto the taxpayers of NC.

It's one thing for taxpayers to offset the costs of education for NC residents. That's expensive enough without having to offset the costs for non-residents, illegal aliens, etc.

I see the other IMPROVEMENT made since yesterday is that it takes about 5 times longer to post a comment.

Any more improvements and they'll get this site to stop working altogether.

Ms. Webster, have you forgotten about the thousands of students at UNC System schools from out of state who theoretically change residence to NC for 3-5 years to receive in-state tuition? These are "leach" people who only come to NC for the low tuition anyway. Then, to even further lower the bill to mommy & daddy, they "switch" residency!

Why not work to end this as well? I am very certain that the cost of these people over the years has far surpassed $5.2 million.

While I agree with the principle of this LTTE, working to end those things and what I have referenced will be an uphill battle. As we all know, wealthy alumni/ae carry a lot of weight!

Shalom

The in-state fetish of the state legislature significantly weakens the UNC system. Look, half of the state residents don't pay income taxes anyway, so if we're worried about fairness to the "tax-payers," why not worry about this group, too?

Getting the best out-of-state students is a good investment for NC: some decent percentage of them will stay in the state and make strong contributions to the economy.

Post a comment

Contact Us | About Us | News & Record Jobs | Terms of Use | Subscribe | Help
Print Advertising | Online Advertising | © 2004 News & Record
Subscription Services, Manage your subscription, Create a subscription

ADVERTISEMENT