News & Record, Greensboro, NC
,
°
Humidity: %
Wind: mph,
Market Place
TriadCareers TriadCars TriadHomes Triad Marketplace Business Directory Classifieds Newspaper Ads Featured Job Ads Archives Apartments Celebrations Obituaries Place an Ad Personals Print Advertising Ad Post Online Advertising N&R Store
ADVERTISEMENT
Special Sections
test
Letters to the Editor
Wednesday, May 16, 2007

« Simple explanations mask complex truths | Main | Only property owners should vote on bonds »

Darwinism doesn't explain the arts

The following is a Counterpoint

By Robert Hudson

David Brooks' recent column, ''Look around you: Darwin is everywhere today,'' posits that evolution of species pretty much explains it all. It is all the rage among those who are truly up to date with their thinking. I respectfully disagree.

I will be the first to admit that Charles Darwin was a very smart man. His ability to observe and make sense of nature helps us to better understand this wonderful world and the various species of life that inhabit it.

But Darwinism simply cannot explain several things, especially when it comes to man. For those interested in the subject, Robert Godwin addresses it quite capably in his book, ''One Cosmos Under God: The Unification of Matter, Life, Mind, and Spirit.''

How, for instance, can evolution account for art and music? How on earth, by ''monkeying around'' with paint and noise, did early humans stumble upon a way to liberate spirit from air and matter, to achieve a radiance and harmony well beyond the physical properties of light and sound?

Or, consider language. According to the great philosopher of science, Stanley Jaki, the theory of natural selection must ironically ''be proposed in the medium called language, which remains even today as unexplained on a Darwinian basis as it was when Darwin tried to cope with it.'' In other words, language accounts for, and, therefore, transcends, the theory of evolution. Thus, it cannot be accounted for by Darwin's theory, and to think otherwise is to attempt to give birth to your mother.

Natural selection does nor care that we are happy or fulfilled, only that we survive to pass our genes along to the next generation. So why should a brain that was selected by evolution so that it might be able to mate, hunt and forage a little more successfully than apes, also be capable of art, music, literature, science, moral ideals, religious truths? Most everything human have done with their mind in the past 40,000 years -- at least all of the really interesting things that define us as human -- has been completely and utterly superfluous from the standpoint of natural selection.

After thousands of generations with nothing to show for it except an unending series of similar hand axes, there was an almost instantaneous -- by evolutionary standards -- creative explosion about 40,000 years ago. Man, all over the world, began to create utilitarian objects that were, from a standpoint of survival, far more beautiful than they had to be. It had nothing to do with survival of the species; therefore, Darwin's theory cannot account for it. And yet, it is fact. I believe that Darwin's theories are generally sound, but there is something more at work here.

The writer lives in Pelham.

Comments (10)

Well h ere's the explanation I've accepted, Mr. Hudson.

In adgition to evolution on "man" (not to mention stars to black holes - but we'll save that detail for a later discussion), there is evolution of a plants.

Around the time of your "explosion", a couple wheat genes got together and created what we now call "Bread Flour". This new "natural selection" dramatically improved the production of edible crops to the point that for the first ime, Man was not required to constantly scorage for food - so he had idle time to reflect and create.

Combine that with the lockable knees that freed the hands, and the opposing thumb that made those hands really useful ... and whallaa .. Art.

For the throngs that think I'm full of crap, here's one link to "prove" your position:
http://www.trueorigin.org/knee.asp

For the few that think the throngs are full of crap, here's one link to "prove" your position:
http://www.ejbjs.org/cgi/reprint/20/1/77.pdf

All that said .. thinks are too complex for it not to be Allah, or in the words of Jimi Hendrix: "Anyway it's beyond the will of God, and the grace of the Kings".

bty - anyone know why my drain won't drain*? I think Ill go pray for that too.

(I read a white paper by a really smart friend of mine titled that: "Why me Drain won't drain." Bottom line - Scientists & Engineer's do not yet fully understand the transition between full pipe flow (Darcy) and partial-pipe flow (Manning) - so it's are still a partial guess.

... must be the will of God, and the grace of the Kings.

sorry for the typos and fractured structures and such - it's early, I was up late, and didn't proof my crappy communication skills.

To the extent that this letter makes any sense at all perhaps the explanation that Mr. Hudson requests is that the arts help bind us together into stronger societies which is important for the survival of our evolutionary branch. Whether it is the Bible, Mein Kampf, the Koran, or the Beatles or Beethovens music, the arts have shown the ability to move us to action. Rome made great monuments to its power which enhanced its power and influence. Early rock paintings may have had the same survival value.

Who cares anyway, James? You didn't demonize anyone nor did you call anyone names. That should more than make up for your errors. But just to be on the safe side, I'll pray for you. :)

I believe that James' keyboard has not evolved; therefore, the typos!

Shalom

This counterpoint displays no knowledge of biology, cultural history, or the differences between biological and cultural evolution. It is full of fluff, baseless assumptions, pointless irrelevancies and factual and interpretive errors. It is a glorious blend of ignorance and stupidity.
For Stanley Jaki (The Reverend Professor ...), see wikipedia. He is a physicist/religionist/philosopher with no background in language or biology.
At the very least, Mr Hudson should ask himself how evolution of the opposable thumb facilitated graphic and plastic arts, how the evolution of the mammalian ear, opposable thumb, and mobile labia facilitated music, and how the evolution of the human throat and opposable thumb facilitated language and - thereby - poetry, drama, and literature.
Mr Hudson should learn about preadaptation in evolution, consider carefully Darwin's chapters on sexual selection, and he should read something - anything - about artists and "groupies" and the heritability of genius.
This reads like another desperate attempt by the Discovery Institute to denigrate evolution and find a gap for their gods to fill.
As the great English composer Ralph Vaughan Williams said, "There is no reason an atheist can't compose good church music," and so he did, along with 9 symphonies and a host of other orchestral, band, and chamber works. RVW was Darwin's great nephew.

The ability to generate representations is obviously an evolutionary trait. The ability to model the world cognitively--to predict sequences, which depend on abstract causal relations--is what allows humans to dominate lesser species such as koala bears, baby seals, and dolphins.

We are hardwired to take pleasure in innovative forms of representation. The enjoyment you get out of a good painting or a good novel is the motor that drove the development of language and art in the first place.

So when Cockroaches and Fire Ants take over the world .. and they will as sure as the sun set's in the west .. can we then say "The ability to model the world cognitively -- to predict sequences, which depend on abstract causal relations -- is what allows Cockroaches and Fire Ants to dominate lesser species such as koala bears, baby seals, and Mankind.

My money's on armadillos - if they ever evolve the ability not to jump up in the air in front of motor vehicles.

Post a comment

Contact Us | About Us | News & Record Jobs | Terms of Use | Subscribe | Help
Print Advertising | Online Advertising | © 2004 News & Record
Subscription Services, Manage your subscription, Create a subscription

ADVERTISEMENT